247
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 242@lemmy.cafe 59 points 3 months ago

Scaramucci also tweeted, "When polls drop (and they will), Trump is going to go full on racist."

Trump has always been a racist. We've always known it. I guess he can always escalate, but don't pretend this is a new thing. Racism is at the core of his identity.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

Did the Central Park Five case give it away?

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

He still insists that they had criminal records when they did not and he knows that because at President he could background check anyone he feels like at a level no one else in this country could.

[-] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 months ago

They're not calling it a new thing. They're saying he's going to be more overt about it.

Keep in mind, there's still a non-zero chance the guy just straight up says the N word in public before this whole thing is through. As blindingly obvious as Trump's racism is, it can still get even more obvious.

[-] troglodytis@lemmy.world 57 points 3 months ago

How bout we just go vote him out. That's the important part right now. We don't need hyperbole, we just go vote in November

[-] baru@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

Might not be enough. Apparently they have better plans in place to manipulate the voting proces into (incorrectly) declaring Trump and others the winner, even if the votes say something else.

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago

That's not going to work. This isn't Venezuela. If official results differ from exit polls, Democrats would not accept it.

Trump fans are just loud. They're not going to do anything.

[-] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

This is naive thinking. They tried to overturn the result in 2020 and they've had four years to hone their strategy. Moderates who defended the election process last round have been pushed out of office. States with GOP legislatures in particular could refuse to certify totals and instead send electors of their own choosing.

It's not as simple as who gets more votes. The process requires that officials at multiple levels of government work in good faith, and there are a lot of bad faith actors taking office. Look at who won the Maricopa County primaries yesterday. That's the modern GOP.

[-] thegr8goldfish@startrek.website 2 points 3 months ago

I tend to think that once the media calls each state on election night, it becomes very difficult to move forward with contested results UNLESS it comes down to a single state again. If it's a toss up, they'll flex but if it takes flipping multiple states I think the Supreme Clowns will probably take the L.

[-] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 months ago

Isn't that what happened with gore vs bush?

[-] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 21 points 3 months ago

That was decided by SCOTUS

...We're fucked

[-] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

And 2 scotus appointees by the orange turd...were involved with the Gore v Bush election bs

[-] distantsounds@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 42 points 3 months ago

Although the vice president trails Trump by 5 percent in a national Rasmussen poll,

Oh wow, then Harris must be at least 10% ahead! That's actually stellar news. 😀

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 3 points 3 months ago

Yeah Rasmussen is shit, but unfortunately every poll always seems to be D is up 5 points! Reality: D was down 15. :(

[-] RIPandTERROR@sh.itjust.works 36 points 3 months ago

Barret and the gang are getting serious apparently

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 23 points 3 months ago

They always were. They were too extreme for the main Avalanche faction too.

[-] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 30 points 3 months ago

Rasmussen poll

LOL why even give that shit space in your article? Like its one of the worst! Even 538 gives it a poor grade (doesn't even make it to the top 275)

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/pollster-ratings/

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Because rawstory - like all ad-supported media - wants money. It’s a horse race bonanza.

Polls released in late July or early August have offered some . . .

It was published August 1. What “early August” poll are they referencing? Apparently one that happened within 12 hours of the story?

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 4 points 3 months ago

I love the "or" part. You're the goddamn "journalist" find out what the date was lol

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Yeah. The literal second a poll is released it's getting analyzed. Then it's weird to read about later the same day because the stories have to be written to make sense a year from now.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

We just need Trump to hold on a little longer. Just until the ballots are printed.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

He can only drop it to JD Vance now, who would be a surefire loser.

[-] morphballganon@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

Unless he replaces Vance and then drops

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

I believe he can't replace Vance at this point. Vance could himself drop I think? There's lots of FEC questions on that one.

[-] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 3 months ago

Only thing Shady Vance will be dropping is his pants at the Raymour & Flanagan Labor Day sale.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 9 points 3 months ago

That joke is sofa king stupid

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

💥💥💥💥

[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

Like the ff7 terrorist group? Or the video game studio? Which avalanche we talking about? (Too many summer steam games played recently)

[-] Cagi@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago

Both seem keen on fighting corrupt politicians, be it in Medici or Midgar. Hard to tell.

[-] randon31415@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Always saw President Shinra as a competent Trump, and Rufus as "Hi, I'm Eric!"

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Rufus was infinitely smarter tha an Eric could even conceive of

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 13 points 3 months ago
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Ugh. Sweaty rapist face. Can we not, photo editors?

[-] exanime@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Trump is attempting to ski now?!

[-] Drusas@kbin.run 4 points 3 months ago

Oh man, I wish he would. That would be hilarious to see. And dangerous for such an out of shape old man.

[-] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 3 points 3 months ago

It's August. There is no snow.

I reeeeaaaaaaly want to see him try to ski now.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 3 months ago

Let your freak flag fly, Big T. We love seeing you flail and get weirder and meltdown. The more that everyone sees your unhinged bullshit, the worse it looks for ya in November.

[-] aseriesoftubes@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Scaramucci also tweeted, "When polls drop (and they will), Trump is going to go full on racist."

Why does the media keep pretending that Anthony Scaramucci is a serious person? He’s as much of a whore for attention as Trump.

[-] HaleHirsute@infosec.pub 8 points 3 months ago

I used to think so too, but I watch him on the Rest is Politics US podcast he comes across as very thoughtful with great insights.

[-] thesporkeffect@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

He's an asshole but not an idiot, and he's not pretending to be anything he's not

[-] MerchantsOfMisery@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago

These headlines are so over the top.

[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

We can only hope

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
247 points (94.9% liked)

politics

19096 readers
1882 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS