31
submitted 1 month ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/usa@lemmy.ml
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

538 had Hillary beating Trump in 2016.

Polls are shit, have a plan and get out and vote.

VOTE!!!

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago

538 had Hillary beating Trump in 2016.

No they didn't. They had Hillary with something like a 60% chance of winning. That's not "had Hillary beating Trump" that's "Hillary was more likely to win than Trump."

[-] JudahBenHur@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

I dont have proof, but I believe it was a hell of a lot higher than 60%

[-] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

It was. IIRC, it got up to almost 90% in mid October. https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

It wasn't 100%. It's a forecast not a premonition.

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Sure, Jan

You know how the internet works, right?

https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/

Don’t miss the forest for the trees. The point being— polls are shit 💩

GET OUT AND VOTE!!!

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

You know how probability works right? No, of course you don't. Almost nobody does...

[-] Pheonixdown@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

Some of us play XCOM, 95% chance to hit might as well be 0% when you need 100%, usually means it's time for a grenade.

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago

Hah! Excellent example. 😆

[-] TheEtherBunny@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

The very idea that 50% of any uncontrived sample of people in the USA would vote for that compulsively lying wannabe dick-tater is appalling.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago
this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
31 points (84.4% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7124 readers
759 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS