323

A school board member in Ohio did the Nazi salute to the board’s president, who later resigned, during a contentious Tuesday meeting.

Tipp City Schools board member Anne Zakkour said, “Oh … Sieg Heil,” before doing the Nazi salute to the group’s head, Simon Patry, during a meeting about transparency in school projects.

Zakkour had tried interrupting Patry during his remarks before Patry told her she was not allowed to speak, leading to her using the Nazi salute.

...

The incident is the latest example of how controversial school board meetings have gotten since the pandemic as issues of transparency and curriculum have caused many meetings around the country to bubble over in fury.

all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] justhach@lemmy.world 143 points 1 year ago

Remember when we used to never hear about school board meetings because they were dry, boring school board meetings?

Yeah, I want to go back to that.

[-] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 87 points 1 year ago

All this could have been avoided 7 years ago if only a few more people got off their lazy asses and voted.

President Trump would not have happened, the Supreme Court would not have swung to the far right ushering in a whole boat load of awful verdicts, without a traitor in the White House a ton of stuff wouldn't have been polarized such as vaccines and government departments and institutions. Nazis would still be considered evil by most Americans - imagine that!

Huge turning point and unfortunately the genie is out of the bottle all because voters can't be bothered to head to the polls.

Imagine if in 2000 the Supreme Court hadn't stopped the Florida vote count and we got a president who read security briefings about attacks on American soil and cared about climate change.

[-] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Imagine if Americans learned from the past and figured out that Republicans are bad for their wallets, bad for the environment, bad for business, bad for the country and the planet.

[-] ShoeboxKiller@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Imagine if Americans learned from the past and figured out that geriatric politicians are bad for their wallets, bad for the environment, bad for business, bad for the country and the planet.

[-] DigitalTraveler42@lemm.ee -5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're not blaming the right people by blaming the voters, Trump was the Republican party's Fault, he's their Frankenstein's monster, he shouldn't even be able to run for office again after 1/6 yet here they are still letting him and protecting him. The Republican party has abdicated it's responsibility to run quality candidates, they should have been the first check to balance the scales against someone like Trump, and they not only failed but through the work of Roger Aisles and Rupert Murdoch and organizations like the heritage foundation and the Federalist society along with the religious zealots have added fuel to the fire for the past 30 years.

So now they're a Qult worshipping an aging Orange Joseph Smith that nobody seems fully capable of holding accountable, and his white supremacist/neo-nazi/pro-authoritarian facist friends.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They’re not blaming the voters. They’re blaming nonvoters.

[-] spider@lemmy.nz 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Trump was the Republican party's Fault, he's their Frankenstein's monster

Actually it was a bipartisan effort:

How the Hillary Clinton campaign deliberately "elevated" Donald Trump with its "pied piper" strategy

[-] resin85@lemmy.ca 89 points 1 year ago

Would you be shocked if I told you that she was a Republican? And that parents filed a lawsuit in 2021 to have her removed? Me neither.

[-] LostMyRedditLogin@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

This is why school board members shouldn't be elected by randos with no stake in the schools.

[-] meyotch@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 year ago

But who doesn’t have a stake in our schools? We all depend upon an educated workforce to run everything.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Their stake is different than yours.

They want obedient, unquestioning, future sheep for their theocracy. They don’t want an educated workforce because educated people ask too many questions and make too many demands - especially for things like decent pay and good working conditions.

[-] tomatopathe@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Republicans rely on an uneducated public to vote for them.

[-] JoBo@feddit.uk 4 points 1 year ago

This is true. But if every rando understood that, conservative politicians would not exist. And yet, they do.

[-] charles@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago

how controversial school board meetings have gotten since

If the next words aren't "Moms For Liberty started forcing their christofascist demands into every meeting using astroturfed Kokh dollars", it's not telling the full story.

[-] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

He sees another board member do a Sieg Heil, even sarcastically, and then resigns? Borderline irresponsible.

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 year ago

She wasn't promoting Nazism herself, she was sarcastically calling the president a Nazi. Or the Nazi.

[-] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I didn't think she was actually promoting Nazism. But if you Sieg Heil, or use the n-word or any slurs, you better have a good reason. And "council procedure doesn't allow people to interrupt the president of the board" is not a good enough reason.

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Seemed like it was an ongoing issue and that was just the proverbial straw. Also, the retort may have hit close to the heart for the dude to dip out right after. But, as usual, this is just speculation on my part.

[-] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I don't think it's worth it in any case. You can use another example. Doing stuff like this takes away from your point and muddles everything.

[-] Zippy@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

You are comparing the two slurs where there is no comparison. There are many instances where you could legitimately call someone a Nazi. Ie. Calling out a white supremacist as a Nazi.

There is pretty much zero situations where I can use the n word. (Unless between your race and as a term of endearment)

[-] ClanOfTheOcho@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

That did seem a little odd to me. I suspect there's at least a little more to this story that the article didn't include.

[-] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

If we're being charitable, it's possible that there was a lot of drama generated by the action and the president wanted to avoid that? But still, irresponsible. Resigning in situations like that is how extremists have taken over local and state politics - because no one wants to deal with them.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I'm handling this responsibility over to the nazi's...

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 0 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Tipp City Schools board member Anne Zakkour said, “Oh … Sieg Heil,” before doing the Nazi salute to the group’s head, Simon Patry, during a meeting about transparency in school projects.

In a statement to Crisis in the Classroom, the education franchise for Dayton 24/7, Zakkour said the salute was a sarcastic gesture because of how controlling Patry had been at meetings.

Patry has been acting like a dictator on our board for years and last night I had enough of his demands of total obedience,” she said.

“My reaction last night was symbolic and a sarcastic gesture of submission to a board officer acting as a dictator.

The Hill has reached out to Zakkour and current board president Amber Drum for comment.

The incident is the latest example of how controversial school board meetings have gotten since the pandemic as issues of transparency and curriculum have caused many meetings around the country to bubble over in fury.


The original article contains 272 words, the summary contains 158 words. Saved 42%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 08 Sep 2023
323 points (97.6% liked)

politics

19241 readers
1822 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS