570
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 233 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The bitch caved.

Edit: Harris has racked up some serious fucking wins. I hope she can keep this up. That they are debating on her terms after trump pulled his bullshit is utterly humiliating. She fucking owned him.

[-] BossDj@lemm.ee 160 points 3 months ago

The Art of the Deal: Lose constantly, but keep telling everyone you won

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 43 points 3 months ago
[-] FiniteLooper@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

The Blart of the peel

[-] SoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 months ago

The Shart of the Heel

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 61 points 3 months ago

And lied while doing it, imagine that:

“I think it’s very important to have debates, and we’ve agreed with Fox on a date of September 4. We’ve agreed with NBC. Fairly full agreement subject to them on September 10. And we’ve agreed with ABC on September 25,” the former president said. ... An ABC source was confident that the network’s debate would be the first one between Trump and the vice president, as the Harris campaign has indicated she will not agree to the Fox News debate.

A source familiar with the NBC negotiations said September 25 was “one of the dates” given to the campaigns. While the network has been in discussions with both camps, the Harris campaign has not formally accepted.

[-] baronvonj@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

The use of both "we've agreed" in the first sentence, and "subject to them" in the third makes me believe he means we == Trump campain and them == Harris campaign. So lying liar though he is, I don't read that as him claiming Harris agreed to a Fox debate.

You're right about use of "we" and "them", and right that he doesn't claim Harris has agreed to fox.

But that next sentence:

Fairly full agreement subject to them on September 10.

Says "I'm only doing it if she does fox first"

[-] flicker@lemmy.world 28 points 3 months ago

It's so hilariously obvious what he's doing, too! "We also want a debate on Fox on the 4th."

So you can get her on your turf, have Fox attack her, and then claim because of some bullshit reason that her behavior on the 4th means you won't do the one on the 10th? Fuck that. No more playing children's games.

You lose! Good day sir!

[-] elfin8er@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

You're an inhuman monster!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc 18 points 3 months ago

I don't think he has.

He's trying to make it sound like all 3 dates are agreed by both sides, but Harris hasn't agreed to fox. When she doesn't show he can decline sept 10th.

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 149 points 3 months ago
[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Wearing his favorite John Wayne Gacy style rape shirt

[-] Humanius@lemmy.world 101 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The headline is a bit misleading. Trump agreed to the ABC debate if Harris agrees to the Fox debate.
This is just a ploy for him to either get Harris to show up on Fox, or if she doesn't debate him on Fox, spin it in such a way that Harris is somehow not wanting to debate him (Even though she never agreed to a Fox debate)

[-] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 71 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The narrative is already being set that he agreed to the ABC debate. So, regardless of conditions, what will be remembered is that he said he would be there, and then wasn't. I don't think there's a way he could safely back out of ABC at this point, regardless of what Kamala does.

[-] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 3 months ago

I look forward to Kamala having a full prime time slot to herself

[-] krashmo@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

You say that as if people on either side expect him to be consistent and rational. His supporters don't care what he does as long as it upsets Democrats and Democrats already know he's a liar.

He's already agreed to it and backed out once.

[-] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 16 points 3 months ago

No, he formally accepted the ABC debate on September 10. He invited Harris to a Fox News debate on September 4 and an NBC debate on September 25. Harris declined the Fox News debate and has neither accepted nor declined the NBC debate.

Looking at this article, his formal acceptance is conditional. I suspect conditional on Harris doing fox.

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

He 100% intends to do the Fox debate then weasel out before facing her in a real debate, which is why he is making the ABC debate conditional on doing Fox first.

[-] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Confirmation from her campaign or a source on the non-ABC stuff?

[-] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

And he wants the Fox debate to be first. He FULLY intends to back out after they give him the special treatment, which is why Harris won't do Fox first.

[-] Guy_Fieris_Hair@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Loudly, from the roof tops, "I accept your debate at ABC" Make him decline again.

[-] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago

He's such an idiot. He won't show up, and we're all going to get to call him a coward for it. I can't wait.

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 80 points 3 months ago
[-] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz 27 points 3 months ago

This image is cursed in so many ways

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 21 points 3 months ago

it's obviously photoshopped because his mouth isn't gaping

[-] grubbyweasel@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

that's an actual butthole

[-] tetrachromacy@lemmy.world 73 points 3 months ago

He did agree, but he's placed the Fox interview before the NBC or ABC debates. So, the plan is to do the Fox debate to roaring, paid crowds where he gets softball questions and Harris gets asked transparently sealioned questions. It'll look something like this:

Interviewer: "Mr. President Trump, sir, how did you come by all of your elite skills playing golf? How do you maintain your unearthly, jaw dropping masculinity in the face of relentless feminization by the radical left?"

T: rambling, incoherent 3 minute long speech about Harris' low IQ and how immigrants want to abort your 3 month old babies

Interviewer: "Kamala(pronounced incorrectly), why are you going to take everyone's guns away so that they can be attacked in their own homes by the gay Mafia and immigrant caravans? Why are you going to force American man to get castrated, then put their privates into a blender, and use their extracted testosterone to turn all the girl kids into boys against their will?"

There. No need to watch Fox debate now, I just summarized it for you.

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 128 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The Harris campaign has not agreed to the Fox debate. That's him lying.

The only debate the harris campaign had agreed to yet is the one that was originally planned before biden dropped out. Her campaign has fully controlled his bullshit here, which is great to see.

[-] tetrachromacy@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago

I agree. Harris's team is doing an outstanding job with handling his useless drivel.

[-] EmpathicVagrant@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

It’s pushback we’ve needed to see since his initial campaign.

[-] snooggums@midwest.social 41 points 3 months ago

No need to watch Fox debate now, I just summarized it for you.

The Fox debate that won't be happening because Harris never accepted? That imaginary debate?

[-] tetrachromacy@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

Yeah, that one, lol. Ain't gonna happen, but if it did, that's how I imagine it'll go.

[-] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 71 points 3 months ago
[-] fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc 19 points 3 months ago

I don't think he did. He's trying to make it sound like all three dates including fox were agreed by both sides. When Harris doesn't show at fox he will withdraw from ABC.

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 40 points 3 months ago

Trump and Harris don't agree...

Biden agree immediately and Harris agreed immediately, trump ran (orangely waddled) away because he's a weird, old coward. Everyone laughed at him, laughed at jd vance fucking couches and now he crawled back desperately. Fuck you, CNN.

[-] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Is it me or is CNN just Fox news with a liberal mask now? I mean they still have some good correspondents but holy shit the amount of crap one has to swim to find actual facts on there is becoming worse and worse

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Look at who runs it now and the billionaire they are taking orders from. CNN was never the best, but yes, there was a clear turn in their approach.

[-] barsquid@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

There is no mask but yes it is.

[-] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 15 points 3 months ago

He's gonna phone this shit in.

[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

He won’t show up. I guarantee it. It’s either that or he just received fresh new compromat on Harris/Walz from his buddy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bazus1@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

POPCORN! GETCHYA FRESH POPCORN RIGHT HEEYA!

[-] BlucifersVeinyAnus@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 months ago
[-] Buelldozer@lemmy.today 2 points 3 months ago

Oh this gunna be guuuuuuud!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2024
570 points (98.5% liked)

News

23367 readers
1812 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS