269
I hope she keeps Buttigieg.
Secretary of Owning Fox News
That's basically the Press Secretary, but I think that would be a downgrade in job title from DOT Secretary for him. He would kick ass at that job though.
What would he do exactly? He's had a hell of a lot of problems as DOT lead.
The same thing he's currently doing: fail at his actual job but still be celebrated for being good at pointing out the obvious about fascists 😮💨
Create a new "Department of Calling Out Bullshit", problem solved
On the one hand, hell yeah!
On the other hand, John Oliver or Jon Stewart would probably be better at that..
I thought his job was being a non-threatening gay man.
You know, he has to be gay, but not in any way that a straight person might be too uncomfortable with. It’s not easy.
She'll probably promote him to another position he's even more unqualified for. The do-nothing secretary of sound bytes can't stop failing upwards.
If he’s good at verbal exchange but not so good at governing, maybe Harris could try making him a diplomat.
Maybe he could be US Ambassador to the United Nations, like Nikki Haley was. He wouldn’t even have to leave the United States that way.
Would probably be much better at something in the WH press room since that requires ONLY what he's actually good at, unlike a diplomatic position.
Too bad that going from a cabinet secretary to a WH staffer would be so insulting as to be unthinkable lol.
On second thought though, as long as there's a competent secretary of state to guide him, he might not fuck up TOO much at the UN..
he might not fuck up TOO much at the UN
See, the convenient thing about the UN post is that, even though it’s prestigious, it’s also not of much consequence because America doesn’t care about the UN.
Pete for SecState!
No faster way to ensure he’ll never be President than running the State Department. There were six people who went from Secretary of State to President. The last one was Buchanan in 1857, before the invention of radio, television, and internet computing.
The world is much smaller now, and it’s near impossible to consistently make decisions that align with the majority of Americans while protecting America’s international alliances and interests.
Honestly, appointing him to another position at all might doom his presidential aspirations. He kind of needs to be elected to something beyond mayor to show he's got the ability to win a campaign.
No faster way to ensure he’ll never be President than running the State Department
Might be worth it then, as long as he's replaced by someone actually qualified quickly enough.
I think I've heard this suggestion before. If we had a leaderly and charismatic secretary of state, with the global influences on American politics, and the world being as small as you've described, it might just as easily be the perfect route to office. What a better office to showcase how you'd run the country than sec state? I just think your sample size is too small for the conclusion. It's more about the candidate then that particular office, imo.
It's a sharp observation that democracy imposes a time penalty on foreign affairs; like, at that stage--diplomacy, war--it's very serious business, and the public isn't always going to have the a full appreciation of the sums, especially when it concerns long-term geopolitics. Despite that, there's a public referendum every four years. So initiatives as to affairs of state have a correlation between how fast they must work and how popular they have to be. Or, third option, they must be secret.
I hope that means she isn't listening to the billionaires who want Lina Kahn gone.
Me too that be huge mistake. But so far she been doing the right thing lets hope she continues to do so.
I am ready for a new Attorney General.
Can we impeach the justices that will hinder progress with this administration?
Plus you know, people in charge of the FUCKING judicial system shouldn’t have ties to war criminals where possible (considering we most definitely are war criminals, I’m not ignorant to that)
younger, more diverse than Biden
Not a high bar to clear
Given shapiros’s comments supporting Harris and walz at the Philly rally….
I would be surprised if he didn’t get a seat.
I doubt it. He legit told the campaign he was getting cold feet about leaving his role as PA Gov when they were in the final stages of screening him (who says that in a job interview tho?). I think he’s shooting for the top. He doesn’t want to be a vice anything
Vice President is the surest path to President in US politics.
It’s a good thing to be honest about that, tbh
Given his cv and everything I know about Democrats, it'll be Secretary of State.
I'm available. On second thought, I want to be a Supreme Court justice.
no one wants to be an embarrassment. why not get a real job like mime artist or lute player?
The Independent - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for The Independent:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source
Media Bias Fact Check | bot supportSearch topics on Ground.News
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/kamala-harris-cabinet-pick-predictions-b2593594.html
this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
269 points (96.5% liked)
politics
19107 readers
1994 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS