387
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Now, the Democratic presidential candidate’s campaign is nodding to her summer job to highlight her upbringing and a platform to boost American workers that stands in stark contrast to her Republican rival Donald Trump, who “has no plan to help the middle class — just more tax cuts for billionaires,” according to a recent ad.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Tramdan@sh.itjust.works 115 points 3 months ago

*to have worked at Macdonalds.

[-] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 54 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)
[-] Sammy@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 months ago

t’ve mctwerked

[-] freewheel@lemmy.world 77 points 3 months ago

Things must be getting really bad if the president needs a second job....

[-] Frozengyro@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

Particularly if that second job is McDonald's. Nothing wrong with that job, just not the best job I'd think a president could get.

[-] disguy_ovahea@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago

With the price of McDonald’s these days, she may be just doing it for the employee discount.

[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 56 points 3 months ago

Oh, that's probably why conservatives fear her. Not the legal background.

She doesn't just relate to millennials and younger, she's suffered like millennials and younger

[-] prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works 55 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

She’s gen-x

Gen-x got fucked over big time in a way we millenials didn’t, but only because the expectation for them was so much higher. They got almost the same raw deal we did without the previous generation to buffer them.

They shouted and raised the alarm bells about what was being done to millenials and younger.

Lots of gen x slipped right in with the boomers and have their life, but many many more are out here struggling with us millennials except they didn’t grow up in a world where it was apparent it was slipping from them.

Gen-xers are gonna be huge for us honestly.

[-] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

My parents and my girlfriend's parents were both gen x. Mine bought a house in the 90s and lived the middle class dream. Nothing fancy but regular camping trips and occasional vacations. Girlfriend's got destroyed by the 08 crash and grew up in borderline poverty. We are in vastly different places financially and it's pretty fucked.

She jokes that I tell my parents "mummy look, I've adopted a poor" in an English accent.

The worst part is my mom recently told me to invest in real estate because it only goes up. I'm like "yeah because old fucks like you hoard it and reduce the supply so nobody my age can afford one." Love them but damn they're boomer brained sometimes.

[-] Jasonw911@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

Younger gen-x here. You nailed it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] hOrni@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Contrary to trump, she actually worked in her life.

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 21 points 3 months ago

Now she's making a hamberder out of Trump.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Yikes. I wouldn't even feed that to pigs.

[-] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 7 points 3 months ago

But Mr. Wu would feed trump to his pigs.

[-] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 4 points 3 months ago

Swearengen! Cocksucker!

[-] BeanSwellington@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago

Everybody got a side hustle these days I guess

[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 16 points 3 months ago

Times are hard when you have to work two jobs by running the country and flipping burgers.

[-] Rustywhims@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

TIL. Those who have worked in the food industry, will always have way more respect for somebody else who has worked in the food industry.

That shit is hard. I wonder if she had that moment many in that industry have had crying in the cooler.

[-] M137@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

As an non-american that seems very patriotic.

[-] taiyang@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Wait, the MacDonald's? The one I saw featured prominently in 1988's Mac and Me? Radical!

[-] BananaPeal@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

No, you're thinking of McDowell's from 1988's Coming to America.

[-] FanciestPants@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Aw, that's not fair to presidents elected prior to 1955 that never had the chance to work at McDonalds.

[-] FlaminGoku@reddthat.com 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

George Washington would have made a fine Big Mac.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] fluxion@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

Glad to see a colleague in the Oval Office

[-] Iapar@feddit.org 9 points 3 months ago
[-] Cptmurph616@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 months ago

People go there to get down with the rock music.

[-] FanciestPants@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

If she were from the east coast, we could have a "from White Castle to White House" slogan.

[-] AnIntenseMoist@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Makes it sound like a downgrade tbh

[-] toynbee@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I've spent my entire life on the east coast and, to my knowledge, never been anywhere near a White Castle restaurant.

Though I would love to go to one. The frozen sandwiches are fantastic by my low standards.

[-] witx@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 3 months ago

Why can't she go to the white house? Why would a president need to work out of a mcdonalds? ...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SomeGuy69@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

The American dream, it's still alive. From dishes cleaner to president. /s

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

"oh yeah, well i played at a McDonald's commercial!"

— some old weirdo, probably

[-] riodoro1@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

They really are just like us, come look, she even worked at mcdonalds.

[-] AfricanExpansionist@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

A president will work at McDonald's? Cool!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2024
387 points (96.2% liked)

politics

19120 readers
2067 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS