95

The Department of Health and Human Services is about to publish the final prices for 10 prescription drugs that Medicare covers, following negotiations between the federal government and the pharmaceutical manufacturers. The drugs include expensive, widely used blood thinners and diabetes treatments, as well as a cancer therapy medication.

Such negotiations are routine in most other economically advanced countries ― it’s the way their governments set drug prices — but they have never before taken place in the U.S. That’s changing this year thanks to the Inflation Reduction Act, which Democrats passed on a party-line vote and President Joe Biden signed into law last year.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 28 points 3 months ago

Also, the new prices won’t actually take effect until Jan. 1, 2026.

...

Even figuring out the magnitude of the likely savings could be difficult, or at least take some time. The newly negotiated prices for these 10 drugs are going to be much lower than the official list prices, but Medicare insurers already get discounts on those prices for their customers. And those discounts are proprietary information.

Yeah I think such a distant change will be hard to spin into meaningful voter opinion. Maybe I'm wrong, but it feels a little too small and abstract to have a big impact.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 20 points 3 months ago

Yeah I think such a distant change will be hard to spin into meaningful voter opinion. Maybe I’m wrong, but it feels a little too small and abstract to have a big impact.

This like, every policy the Democrats went after for the past 4 years. Bruh just focus on the Child Tax credit so we can get a Democrat elected.

[-] usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml 16 points 3 months ago

They did go after it, but Republicans killed it in congress

Senate Republicans block bill to expand child tax credit

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/senate-democrats-will-force-vote-expand-child-tax-credit-gop-oppositio-rcna164499

[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 11 points 3 months ago

Can't let the Biden administration actually accomplish anything, that would be insane in an election year. Especially since Trump can run on a child tax credit policy now. Same thing with the border bill.

[-] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

I'm still hoping he issues an executive order barring convicted felons from running for federal office.

[-] Anti_Iridium@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

Ehhh, I don't think I would be happy because of stuff like this

[-] Landless2029@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

Downvoted for the most clickbaited title.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

"One reason for the low public awareness may be that the negotiating power is quite limited. The new prices apply only to Medicare and not private insurance for non-elderly, non-disabled Americans. And the negotiations cover only a limited set of drugs, starting with the 10 medications this year."

This is the student loan forgiveness debacle all over again. Claiming credit for a "sweeping change" that few people will ever see. If they see it at all.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 13 points 3 months ago

A public option would give the government the leverage to make this happen for a lot more people. Single payer would give the government the leverage to make this happen for everyone.

I wonder why we don't have either of those.

[-] themadcodger@kbin.earth 8 points 3 months ago

One old tosser from Connecticut.

[-] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I'll bet money though that private insurance companies will see that as a new starting price point.

Edit: also targeting the voting block that votes reliably. (Historically at least)

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 6 points 3 months ago

I think private insurance usually pays more than Medicare (because Medicare is massive, used by people frequently needing health services, and the government can use that leverage to set prices), but whatever negotiated price information they release will be a new anchor for private insurance costs. The private insurances probably aren't going to pay $700 when the government pays $55.

There's also a political incentive for the insurance companies to not look significantly worse than Medicare lest they boost support for Medicare-for-All or a public option.

[-] kikutwo@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Uh, there 66.7 million people enrolled in Medicare.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

And GOP voters won't notice or credit it in any case.

Our babysitter was bemoaning her lack of healthcare when my wife turned her onto the ACA. "This is great and it ain't that Obamacare bullshit!" Yeah.

Democrats fail, hard, at messaging. Harris' team seems to be stepping up though!

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -2 points 3 months ago

Huffington Post - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Huffington Post:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.huffpost.com/entry/biden-harris-announcement-drug-prices-seniors_n_66bcf101e4b03da4fc01cc2d
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2024
95 points (88.6% liked)

politics

19148 readers
1906 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS