721
submitted 2 years ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

Federal data shows the national crime rate has dropped under President Biden

Donald Trump backed out of an interview after a local paper asked him for data to back up his continued baseless claims that crime is on the rise under President Joe Biden.

The Detroit News reported that Trump’s campaign had agreed to an interview with the former president on Tuesday after a campaign speech. However, the campaign suddenly claimed Trump no longer had time for the interview after a reporter began probing them on crime data.

“The Trump campaign had initially agreed that Trump would participate in an interview with The Detroit News on Tuesday,” state politics reporter Craig Mauger wrote. “But after the newspaper began asking about the Michigan crime data before the event, a campaign aide said the presidential candidate no longer had time for an interview after the speech.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 249 points 2 years ago

Pulling out of a scheduled interview as part of a presidential campaign because the interviewer wants you to back up your claim sure is a weird thing to do.

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 4 points 2 years ago

Aren’t the questions usually arranged beforehand? You think that one would prepare in advance.

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

It was easier to cancel the interview than to provide a source for his claim.

[-] Spitzspot@lemmings.world 128 points 2 years ago

Convicted felon Trump's kryptonite is a followup question.

[-] Enthusiasticwhale@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

Pretty much... Weird coward still is a coward

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jaemo@sh.itjust.works 91 points 2 years ago

If this is all you have to do, then EVERY MEDIA OUTLET should do this. Not even hardball, just "ok can you show me some numbers?"

If that's all it takes to get this chicken shit weirdo to curl up in a ball, then fucking do it. He gets no airtime then other than his stupid rallies commemorating when he was pitted against an octogenarian.

[-] ThePantser@lemmy.world 87 points 2 years ago

So the key to keep him running away is to have the media actually ask him real questions? Let's keep asking and he'll never be on TV again other than fox.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

But that would require media outlets to actually have editorial independence. Sadly those days are long gone.

[-] SlippiHUD@lemmy.world 86 points 2 years ago
[-] Hominine@lemmy.world 22 points 2 years ago
[-] nullroot@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago
[-] breakcore@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 2 years ago
[-] nullroot@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Oh, dogs. Sure, I like dags. I like caravans more.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Fish@midwest.social 79 points 2 years ago

Holy fucking shit, I wish mainstream outlets would take notes. Any time Trump talks about crime or immigration or really anything, all you have to do is bring up facts. Quit fucking meeting Republicans in the middle with their lying and bigotry.

[-] Pandantic@midwest.social 72 points 2 years ago

I liked this at the end of the article:

The Washington Post estimated that during his presidency, Trump made more than 30,000 false or misleading statements.

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 54 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I watched the debate between Trump and Biden and could hardly believe that there were no fact checks at all from the moderators. Sure, it would have been good if Biden had pointed out more clearly that almost every statement Trump made was factually incorrect. But can you really just tell any tall tales in your presidential debates without even mentioning any facts? That seems absurd. Is that the norm for presidential debates in the US? Or is it just that Trump would not have participated if there were fact checks?

[-] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 17 points 2 years ago

Do you think for a second that Trump would agree to a debate with fact checking?

[-] DandomRude@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

No, but I thought the US public wouldn't let him get away with never engaging in a (factual) debate. That would make him look weak, because that's how democracy usually works. You know, arguments and counter-arguments - that sort of thing.

[-] Nastybutler@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago

Trump lies at a rate where fact checkers can't keep up.

[-] Plavatos@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 years ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gish_gallop

Generally, it is more difficult to use the Gish gallop in a structured debate than a free-form one.

This sums it up nicely, and why I think he's like any bully: he picks his fights and only ones he can win.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 years ago

It would have been best if there was fact checking as part of the debate, but as you speculated, there's no way Trump would agree to that. And, to be fair, it's probably a difficult thing to do live and accurately in timely manner.

However, other news agencies were doing fact checking during and following the debate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

The media are owned by the oligarchs and those mostly back Trump. Simple as that.

load more comments (1 replies)

That is a very weird way to phrase "Old man throws temper tantrum and refuses to do previously agreed upon interview when called out for lying"

As far as I'm concerned, every media outlet that sugarcoats things, or misrepresent things, or otherwise skews the truth about what the MAGAts are up to are 100% in bed with Republicans, and are mouthpieces for the MAGAgenda

[-] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 33 points 2 years ago

He's really banking on the crazies overthrowing the election isn't he?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago
[-] Bluetreefrog@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago

The Washington Post estimated that during his presidency, Trump made more than 30,000 false or misleading statements.

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 17 points 2 years ago

That seems like a really low estimate.

[-] poprocks@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Agreed. There's only so much budget and time they can commit to fact checking this turd. There's real news to report on.

[-] socsa@piefed.social 4 points 2 years ago

20 per day, certainly he had more than 20 interactions per day

[-] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago

What a coward

[-] Ulrich_the_Old@lemmy.ca 27 points 2 years ago

Just so you know, trump is a known liar. Nothing he says can be taken at face value. Fact check everything.

[-] Worx@lemmynsfw.com 16 points 2 years ago

Who's got time for fact checking? Just assume he's lying whenever his mouth is open and enjoy the rest of your day

[-] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 years ago

Big strong man can't handle being questioned.

[-] Boozilla@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Talking about crime scares him. He's very worried the orange uniform will clash with his "tan".

[-] dogsnest@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago
[-] InternetUser2012@lemmy.today 7 points 2 years ago

Dementia DonOLD the weird racist rapist with 34 felonies had to take his snowflake ass and find himself a safe space.

[-] AnarchoSnowPlow@midwest.social 5 points 2 years ago
[-] ObviouslyNotBanana@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

That's pretty weird.

[-] badbytes@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Wish Trump's dad pulled out!

[-] dream_weasel@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago

"Sir, just to be clear, are you leaving because you have no data to support your claim? Making you a weird, lying sack of shit?"

[-] starrwulfe@social.vivaldi.net 3 points 2 years ago

@MicroWave

All media everywhere needs to just start a “be for real” campaign whenever they’re about to interview him, and perhaps he’ll just self-censor into oblivion…
cc: @kamalaharrisforpresidentnews

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 22 Aug 2024
721 points (98.5% liked)

News

36429 readers
703 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS