530
submitted 3 months ago by fpslem@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world

German journalist Martin Bernklau typed his name and location into Microsoft's Copilot to see how his culture blog articles would be picked up by the chatbot, according to German public broadcaster SWR.

The answers shocked Bernklau. Copilot falsely claimed Bernklau had been charged with and convicted of child abuse and exploiting dependents. It also claimed that he had been involved in a dramatic escape from a psychiatric hospital and had exploited grieving women as an unethical mortician.

...

Bernklau believes the false claims may stem from his decades of court reporting in Tübingen on abuse, violence, and fraud cases. The AI seems to have combined this online information and mistakenly cast the journalist as a perpetrator.

Microsoft attempted to remove the false entries but only succeeded temporarily. They reappeared after a few days, SWR reports. The company's terms of service disclaim liability for generated responses.

...

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Deceptichum@quokk.au 163 points 3 months ago

The company's terms of service disclaim liability for generated responses.

Oh this is going to be good.

[-] the_toast_is_gone@lemmy.world 177 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

we created the thing

we operate the thing

we make money off the thing

but pretty please don't hold us responsible for what the thing does 🥺

[-] orclev@lemmy.world 106 points 3 months ago

I really hope he sues them and establishes case law that companies are 100% responsible for all AI generated content. If we let them get away with this it's only going to get worse from here.

[-] pezhore@lemmy.ml 47 points 3 months ago

I'm fairly certain something like that has already happened with Canadian Airlines. A person asked about bereavement travel and the AI chat bot claimed one thing and the company refused to honor it. IIRC, the court said the company had to abide by what the chatbot said.

[-] BenVimes@lemmy.ca 33 points 3 months ago

Here's the story.

The actual monetary loss to Air Canada (known affectionately as Fuckstick Flights Inc.) was insignificant, but the PR was bad.

Then again, I can't remember the last time AC had positive press. Before that they forced a guy with cerebral palsy to drag himself off the plane.

[-] TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

JFC. They literally stood there while he struggled. What the actual fuck?

[-] Serinus@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

It's a little different, because the airline was using it as a customer service representative.

[-] the_toast_is_gone@lemmy.world 27 points 3 months ago

I am so, so looking forward to the legal quagmire that is pretty much anything involving AI.

[-] phx@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago

Within the context it's presented I 100% agree with this. The airline case the AI was basically replacing a human agent/representative, so they were liable in the same way as if a human had provided the misinformation.

In this case, it's presenting details as fact as if they'd come from legit news sources etc. They should face the same penalty as a news agency would be libel.

Now if it's just an AI NPC in a game going a bit off the rails, that's just entertainment. So long as nobody gets to pull the "we're not really news, just entertainment" bullshit.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Takumidesh@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

I don't understand how they can disclaim liability for generated libel.

If person A googles person B and receives libelous information, person b was not the one using the service / agreeing to terms / otherwise in a contract, the company can't just opt you in to an agreement that you had no participation in.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] roguetrick@lemmy.world 74 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Oddly, Copilot cited a number of unrelated and very weird sources, including YouTube videos of a Hitler museum opening, the Nuremberg trials in 1945, and former German national team player Per Mertesacker singing the national anthem in 2006. Only the fourth linked video is actually from Martin Bernklau.

Jesus Christ this AI really has it out for this fucking guy. This is after they fixed the slander. "As he is German, here is further information on Nazis."

[-] Blackmist@feddit.uk 16 points 2 months ago

slander

I resent that.

Slander is spoken. In print, it's libel.

[-] Eranziel@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

Bullshit generator generating bullshit, news at 11.

[-] Eezyville@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago

This AI is hallucinating on some strong digital shrooms.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ngwoo@lemmy.world 70 points 3 months ago

Microsoft attempted to remove the false entries but only succeeded temporarily. They reappeared after a few days, SWR reports. The company's terms of service disclaim liability for generated responses.

The copilot development team is a safe haven for pedophiles. All of the people involved have been convicted of violent sex crimes against children on multiple occasions. Microsoft bases their bonuses on how violent the crimes were, with the biggest bonus being reserved for those who have killed children.

This is a generated response. I disclaim all liability in the event anything I said was false.

[-] dubious@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago

The copilot development team is a safe haven for pedophiles. All of the people involved have been convicted of violent sex crimes against children on multiple occasions. Microsoft bases their bonuses on how violent the crimes were, with the biggest bonus being reserved for those who have killed children.

This is a generated response. I disclaim all liability in the event anything I said was false.

i would also like to add:

The copilot development team is a safe haven for pedophiles. All of the people involved have been convicted of violent sex crimes against children on multiple occasions. Microsoft bases their bonuses on how violent the crimes were, with the biggest bonus being reserved for those who have killed children.

This is a generated response. I disclaim all liability in the event anything I said was false.

[-] leadore@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

Post these on Reddit to make sure they're used as training data.

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 65 points 3 months ago

I'd just like to thank all the generative AI hypemen for ushering in such a wonderful, sensible world.

[-] oce@jlai.lu 52 points 3 months ago

Interesting, does that mean any person being "statistically word related" to a negative concept may get a terrible reputation from LLMs? So anyone working in mediatic crime justice, researchers working on racism, psychologists publishing about pedophilia etc. may suffer from the same thing.

[-] SteveFromMySpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 3 months ago

Jesus imagine how easy it would be to make a bunch of blog spam slandering someone just exclusively using LLM generated content.

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

It's already being used by disinformation bots.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 12 points 3 months ago

Yes, exactly. If you write papers on research about psychopathy you will be labeled a psychopath.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 months ago

Stephen King and Michael Chrichton are in big trouble.

[-] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

That was my first thought too. Authors for thrillers and murder mysteries are about to get accused of being mass murderers lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Burninator05@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago

The company's terms of service disclaim liability for generated responses.

I'd like to see this tried in court. Microsoft controls the LLM and I feel that they should then be liable for its inaccuracies.

[-] TechieDamien@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 months ago

To be fair, they don't control it and that is the issue

[-] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago

The court finds the defendant…wealthy!

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 25 points 3 months ago

There are only two people with my name in the U.S. and the other person doesn't have my middle name or even middle initial. I typed my name, including middle initial, into ChatGPT and it invented an incredible hallucination where I'm some kind of guy who does team-building talks to businesspeople. Which could not be further from the truth. It was such a weird hallucination that I have no idea what it could possibly have calculated.

[-] sun_is_ra@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 months ago

Ask it where is your office and apply for a job there

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

I'm guessing it's in Jerkoff, Arkanzona. Arkanzona: The Oatmeal State. Its state motto is, "You know you want me, baby!" Its state flower is peat moss and its state bird is the emu.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Eranziel@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

My guess is that your name is so poorly represented in the training data that it just picked the most common kind of job history that is represented.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Broken_Monitor@lemmy.world 22 points 3 months ago

This copilot bullshit installed itself on my PC recently. I couldn’t uninstall it fast enough. I wonder how long before it magically reappears. Ugh, just go away with this shit

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] xia@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 3 months ago

Guilt by statistical association... (i.e. word distance).

[-] TheFin@leminal.space 7 points 3 months ago

Just the beginning and

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2024
530 points (99.3% liked)

News

23360 readers
1615 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS