284
submitted 1 year ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva has said that Russian leader Vladimir Putin will not be arrested in Brazil if he attends the Group of 20 meeting in Rio de Janeiro next year.

Lula, speaking to the Firstpost news show at the sidelines of the G20 meeting in Delhi on Saturday, said Putin would be invited to next year’s event.

He added that he himself planned to attend a BRICS bloc of developing nations meeting due in Russia before the Rio meeting.

“I believe that Putin can go easily to Brazil,” Lula said. “What I can say to you is that if I’m president of Brazil, and he comes to Brazil, there’s no way he will be arrested.”

The statement comes after the International Criminal Court (ICC) issued an arrest warrant against Putin in March, accusing him of the war crime of illegally deporting hundreds of children from Ukraine.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] erusuoyera@sh.itjust.works 119 points 1 year ago

"I lied" Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, 2024.

[-] Konn@lemmy.world 102 points 1 year ago

Would actually be a chad move

[-] ShadowGlider@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

"I actually used a very secret technique there called lying"

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 107 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't think any sane country would arrest Putin. Deny him entry sure. But not arrest him. Declaring war on Russia, even if they are a paper tiger today, is not going to be in anybody's best interest

Exceptions for Ukraine and Poland. They would absolutely arrest Putin on sight.

[-] toastus@feddit.de 47 points 1 year ago

Why should any NATO country (beside maybe Turkey) not immediately arrest him?

[-] GCostanzaStepOnMe@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago

NATO is not at war with Russia.

[-] toastus@feddit.de 45 points 1 year ago

And what does that have to do with arresting a war criminal?

[-] GCostanzaStepOnMe@feddit.de 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Arresting the leader of a sovereign nation amounts at least to a diplomatic crisis, and at worst to a declaration of war.

And before George Bush is brought to trial I don't think the West has much credibility in dealing with war criminals.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

He's only a war criminal if convicted in a court of law.

No, I'm not defending Putin in the slightest bit, I'm simply stating that just because people across the globe have labelled him as a war criminal, doesn't automatically make that official.

[-] ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

And that's why the ICC issued a warrant and any sane country should execute the warrant. We just want to talk to him...

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 year ago

Eh… the international legal system is not very functional so I’m not sure I agree with this. By that definition Hitler was not a war criminal either because he died before going to trial.

[-] electric_nan@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Plenty of war criminals already living freely in NATO countries.

[-] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Cy Borgman: "I could call up my old pal Hank Kissinger! I'm sure he has a few war crimes he never got around to!"

Harley Quinn: "Mm... I know we're criminals, but are we really WAR criminals?"

From the excellent Harley Quinn cartoon

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jet@hackertalks.com 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

World war 3 is going to be a total downer for everyone, most countries will want to avoid it, or at least try not to be the one to start it.

Not to mention the president of a country travels as a diplomat. Arresting diplomats is something that's frowned upon internationally.

Arresting the president of a country, or kidnapping the president of a country, is a pretty clear declaration of war.

Let's say by some miracle war doesn't immediately break out, well the country you've just pissed off has a bunch of hostages immediately available, all of your diplomats and citizens in their borders. As much as we want to talk about rule of law, at the international level between countries it's all about capabilities.

[-] toastus@feddit.de 36 points 1 year ago

It is a false narrative that doing anything against russian aggression automatically means WW3.

And this false narrative is deliberately spread by pro russian channels so that Russia gets challenged as little as possible.

Putin is a war criminal and should be arrested, if Russia then chooses to go to war (which I doubt) they will see how it serves them.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] meco03211@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I think it's not necessarily whether countries would or wouldn't arrest him. It's more, if he's invited to a summit or otherwise making travel arraignments, he gets confirmation they don't intend to arrest him. If a country doesn't commit to not arresting him, he just wouldn't go. If a country says they won't arrest him, then arrest him, it calls into question that country's diplomacy.

[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I am fully pro ukraine.

Because if they arrest him, there could easily be bloodshed outside of Ukraine. As much as nato countries are happy to support Ukraine currently, they aren't interested in inviting conflict to their own borders

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] GBU_28@lemm.ee 13 points 1 year ago

At this point Ukraine might even himars him on sight

[-] ours@lemmy.film 7 points 1 year ago

Maybe it's like Hitler and they don't want Putin being replaced by someone competent at war.

"Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake".

[-] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 7 points 1 year ago

Yeah. Putin would absolutely have diplomatic immunity as a head of state visiting another country. Arresting him would put the whole concept of diplomatic immunity at risk.

[-] bernieecclestoned@sh.itjust.works 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's for domestic crimes. International crimes like genocide, torture and other war crimes have no functional immunity for a head of state. Pinochet for example.

That's why Putin didn't go to South Africa.

[-] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 year ago

It would be a shame if putin's plane had to make an unscheduled landing on the way there.

[-] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 26 points 1 year ago

Or if it had a Rapid Unplanned Disassembly event, midair, over the ocean

[-] Rocketpoweredgorilla@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

That works too, although I'd prefer to see him rot in jail. Sudden death is too quick and easy for people who have done what he has.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 0Xero0@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

"It's not an unscheduled landing, it's a special controlled fast emergency touch-down operation."

[-] Agent641@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

If Im president of Brazil.

I see the loophole here...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] at_an_angle@lemmy.one 15 points 1 year ago

I'll put $20 in him sending a body double.

[-] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

Maybe Putin is already dead/missing and all the body doubles are just trying to act like him until something is resolved

[-] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 year ago

Basically Weekend at Putin's

[-] at_an_angle@lemmy.one 8 points 1 year ago
[-] boredtortoise@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

Wouldn't count it out

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I thought Brazil was a member of the ICC in just the way SA was

[-] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

International law is fairly optional. Will there be consequences if he doesn’t have Putin arrested? I doubt it.

Also, the South African president tried to make the same statement that he wouldn’t be arrested, but the local government said they would do it, so he was forced to uninvite Putin.

It will be interesting to see if a similar dynamic unfolds, but I think the internal politics of Brazil are rather different.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Virkkunen@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

They are, but the country also depends a bit on Russia's exports so the president tends to tip the scales in Putin's side

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

They best have good security, one random with a gun would be hailed as a hero by the western world if they took out Putin.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Sep 2023
284 points (95.5% liked)

World News

39153 readers
1382 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS