103

Don Lemon: Trump campaign unsure what to do with Harris (thehill.com)

submitted 3 months ago by Beaver@lemmy.ca to c/politics@lemmy.world

27 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 27 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] paf0@lemmy.world 42 points 3 months ago

She is a different version of Obama in his eyes and he already tried all the racism and it didn't work. It's fun to watch him squirm.

[-] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 42 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Don't let your guard down. We still have to get so far past the finish line that SCROTUS can't pull another Al Gore.

That said, I'm quite enjoying watching him squirm as well

[-] paf0@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

I'm less concerned about the SC and more concerned with random acts terrorism that will come with a decisive loss. They will only hear the case if it's close and sometimes it seems like Trump is trying to lose.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

I'm concerned with how there are about three different terrifyingly-viable ways for Trump to end up with the Presidency that don't involve getting ≥270 Electoral College votes.

Bush v. Gore 2.0
Jan 6 2.0
Having MAGAs disrupt vote certifications in enough states that neither candidate gets to 270 and the election is thrown to a "one state, one vote" poll in the House.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 2 points 3 months ago

Mr. Gore's name being split on to two different lines for me made me read it as "Artificial Intelligence Gore."

[-] bradinutah@thelemmy.club 1 points 3 months ago

An Inconvenient Truth 2.0

[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago

She's definitely not Obama. Her weakness is policy. She has intentionally avoided the topic because she would undoubtedly alienate some of that "joy" that they're doing so well courting.

Thing is, the GOP in general is extremely weak on policy. And Trump is the worst of the bunch.

So she's probably good, unless the GOP can somehow make her define her stance in certain terms. Which she has always avoided like the plague in the past.

[-] paf0@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Agreed, she is vague now. I liked her better when she defined things:

https://kamalaharris.medium.com/my-plan-for-medicare-for-all-7730370dd421

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 35 points 3 months ago

The whole point of picking J.D. Vance was to counter Harris. Now that she's top of ticket, not only does Trump not know what to do, Vance is pointless against Walz.

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago

The Vance pick had nothing to do with the campaign. When Trump picked Vance he thought that he was guaranteed a victory. He picked Vance to ingratiate himself with Silicon Valley during his Presidency.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

Trump picked Vance because he has an Indian wife and could counter a Harris VP with "I'm not racist, look who I married!"

That got blown up when Harris was elevated and going against Trump.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 23 points 3 months ago

But he doesn't counter Harris at all.

It's just more Trump. A counter would have been Nikki Haley, but that darn misogyny got in the way.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

Trump picked Vance because he has an Indian wife and could counter a Harris VP with "I'm not racist, look who I married!"

That got blown up when Harris was elevated and going against Trump.

[-] TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee 7 points 3 months ago

No. Vance said these magic words:

"I would not have certified the 2020 election."

That's all it took.

[-] Mobiledecay@lemmy.world 17 points 3 months ago

It's only a matter of time before they just start calling her the n word. 🤷‍♂️

[-] dhork@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

What a nasty woman....

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

One option is to fuck himself in the ass with a bicycle.

[-] finley@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

There are so many things he can go fuck himself with.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Seems like a waste of a good bicycle. He should fuck himself in the ass with a worthless car instead.

[-] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

I'm on board with this approach. If I may suggest an additional step - perform a quarter turn on the vertical axis after insertion.

[-] distantsounds@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

Its so nice not having to think about Biden in this election.

[-] finley@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

Who?

[-] distantsounds@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago

He’s the guy that continues to approve arms shipments to Israel. Not a good guy

[-] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago

It's more than a month ago Biden stepped aside and trump is still out of ideas. Guess he is still working on that infrastructure bill.

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 3 months ago

The Hill - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)

Information for The Hill:

MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.News

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4849596-trump-harris-debate-unsure/

Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024

103 points (94.0% liked)

politics

19144 readers

1457 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News