-126

U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris has repeatedly claimed that she worked at McDonald's while getting her undergraduate degree in the 1980s. This claim has been reported by multiple reputable news outlets, but aside from Harris' own testimony, there is no independent evidence such as a photo, employment record, or confirmation from a friend or family member to verify the story. Harris has invoked the alleged McDonald's work experience throughout her political career, including in a 2024 presidential campaign ad and during a 2024 appearance on "The Drew Barrymore Show." Other prominent Democrats, such as former President Bill Clinton, have also repeated the anecdote. However, some internet users have challenged the claim, with unverified reports that "McDonald's Corporate sources" have no record of Harris working at their locations. Snopes reached out to Harris' campaign and McDonald's headquarters seeking evidence to corroborate the claim, but as of the report's publication, no such proof has been uncovered. Without tangible evidence to independently confirm or debunk the story, Snopes has rated the claim "Research In Progress" as they continue to investigate.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 80 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

What the fuck kind of hilarious nonsense is this

Is she planning to deploy the military against protestors and have them seize the voting machines? Or destroy the departments of Education and Labor? No? Okay, cool, she’s got my vote. Now let’s move on to talking about either (a) how to make sure she wins, or (b) how we can get better behavior out of the Democrats on Gaza and climate policy.

Get this Fox News horseshit out of here, pls and thank you

[-] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 21 points 2 months ago

Fox ENTERTAINMENT needs to be banned

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[-] HappyTimeHarry@lemm.ee 48 points 2 months ago

Can they actually prove anyone worked at McDonalds that long ago? Aside from saving a pay stub for 40 years I don't see how one could prove or disprove such a thing, I doubt the company keeps records of every employee that far back.

[-] okwhateverdude@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago

She could have worked for a franchisee, too. If that was the case, a SMB owner is definitely not going to have those records after all this time

[-] AdamEatsAss@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

Assuming that franchise is still even open. How long does the US gov hold onto tax returns? The IRS says there's usually no need to keep them after 6 years. The best evidence they could find would probably be a coworker that corroborates the story or a photograph of Harris behind the counter working. The photo seems unlikely, and how many coworkers from 30 years ago do you remember?

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

The Social Security Administration has a record of every employer that's ever paid you and how much they paid you each year.

They have to for paying out social security.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] norimee@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

I can't think of any way how I could proof the first job I had during school in the late 90's. I was working in a restaurant kitchen, peeling potatoes and stuff. You don't take photos there or keep name tags or other keepsakes. It was a shitty job, you want to forget about it, as soon as you left the premises.

Kamala Harris' job is even longer ago. 40 years is a long time to keep paystubs or something. There were no camera phones back then, no digital footprint you could recreate. That she can't produce any proof, doesn't proof anything.

[-] ccunning@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Also, and possibly more importantly…

…WHo FuKinG CArES?!?

load more comments (26 replies)
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Social security records.

90s is nothing, a normal person could get it in a month, one of her aids could probably get it in an hour.

Does it matter tho?

Eh, it would be fucked up if she just flat out lied, but it's hard to imagine she would lie about that.

If she proves it tho, they'll make a new stupid claim and if she doesn't prove it they'll use this as evidence that she would prove it if it wasn't true.

[-] odelik@lemmy.today 15 points 2 months ago

How to know when OP is unhinged and divisive:

People are agreeing with givesomefucks, who often gets down voted for unpopular views.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] morphballganon@lemmynsfw.com 32 points 2 months ago

... who cares?

Sometimes people bounce from one job to another. College jobs don't have to be her identity.

[-] Artyom@lemm.ee 26 points 2 months ago

When someone tells me they worked a specific job in college, I have never once doubted the truth of that statement. Why would anyone have reason to lie about such a thing? If it was a complete lie, you'd constantly be at risk of being exposed by a close friend who knew the truth, which is WAY WORSE for a presidential candidate. To even explore this as Snopes is pro-Trump.

[-] capt_wolf@lemmy.world 25 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

She's not a sex offender or a convicted felon.

load more comments (13 replies)
[-] Doom@ttrpg.network 18 points 2 months ago
[-] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago

We could check his tax returns to findohwaitaminute!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Steve@startrek.website 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Stolen McValor 🤦‍♂️

[-] benderbeerman@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 months ago

ITT: disinformation influencers and bad faith shills, and a bunch of people not putting up with their shit

load more comments (47 replies)
[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

Why in the hell is this even something to discuss?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

They need to find someone who actually ate one of Harris’s alleged burgers and can testify that it was at least as good as the ones Trump served in the White House—otherwise why should anyone vote for her?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 months ago

Oh my God who cares. Donald Trump has never worked a day in his goddamn life. Frankly I could not care less what Kamala Harris' summer job was

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I worked for Burger King in the 80's and you'd never be able to prove that, either. I worked much longer for Sears in the 80's and I wouldn't be able to prove that, either. This is completely pointless.

I don't even know I'd be able to prove I served in the Army Reserve for six years if it weren't for my DD214.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago

When she's elected I hope McDonald's throws up a giant "Employee of the Month" poster. ;)

[-] kikutwo@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

You need a hobby.

[-] NameTaken@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

This is just sad. Whether she lied about McDonald's or not has no bearing at all on who I will vote for in the coming election. In the grand scheme of things this is meaningless. In fact if this is literally all that can be dug up about Harris it kind of speaks highly of her.

At the end of the day we all lose cause essentially elections are coming down to whoever is the lesser of two evils and not someone you stand behind.

[-] CeruleanRuin@lemmings.world 11 points 2 months ago

What a fucking non-story. "Retail giant keeps poor records of its disposable employees from FORTY FUCKING YEARS AGO". Piss off.

[-] 800XL@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Holy shit who gives a fuck? Jesus christ, conservatives. Grow the fuck up. You are all are mentally 12 years old and act like it. What's next? You gonna make a big deal about something she wore once?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
-126 points (9.1% liked)

politics

19090 readers
4499 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS