Fairly recognizable arguments, but in case people have not seen them before 
Oh lord don't have this start the nonsense "AI" "Art" struggle session again please 
i disagree with the premise: i'm pretty sure we have dozens of art shitposts and cia nonsense made by people where they remove the influence of such choices to make some point that's entirely lost on me because the "art" doesn't represent, convey, or look like anything.
a generative model is trivially not an artist, but there's no reason actual (as opposed to marketing scam) artificial intelligence, if that ever exists, couldn't produce art.
or you could read the article and find that it agrees with you 
(at least on second point). On the first point, if you mean modern art, eh its still represents some arcane choices for author or some point they try to make
article has a paywall
oops, fixed
On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.
Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020
Rules: