177
submitted 1 year ago by floofloof@lemmy.ca to c/technology@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Thann@lemmy.ml 205 points 1 year ago

MFs worried about bill gates trying to chip them didn't even think about big parma

[-] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Big Parma! 🤣

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago

Also real quick

The trackers are in the shell which you don't eat (or aren't supposed to eat)

[-] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago

Which I will use it when making tomato sauce.

[-] rmuk@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago

I, too, like my chips with dip.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] big_slap@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 32 points 1 year ago

Somewhat of a tangent, but can we stop caring about the location where a product was made and focus solely on quality itself? Like, I bet the counterfeiters make a lot of money by producing quality cheese that taste just as good but are just made somewhere else.

[-] neptune@dmv.social 14 points 1 year ago

Some foods do have specific, regional character. Is the milk or yeast from the next county over going to make a cheese that tastes the same? Idk but you can get very similar styles of cheese made elsewhere.

That all being said, I can see why calling same thing Parmesan when it's not from Parma, is not entirely truthful, if consumers care about origin. Which in the EU they certainly do.

[-] lobut@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 year ago

You have a good point. At the same time, I'd like to pay what I think I'm getting. If someone is selling me something and making me think it's something else, I think that's wrong.

[-] nyctre@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We are focusing on both, afaik. I'm pretty sure the doc/aop/igp qualifications relate to quality as well as geography. It's not just about the location.

And there's nothing stopping anyone from making a better cheese, naming it whatever else other than a trademarked name and building a reputation for quality. So I don't see what the issue is.

Edit: happy now?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] vettnerk@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

I for one really do not care whether it's called Parmesan or Parmigiano Regiano. Good cheese is good cheese.

[-] roguetrick@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Can only judge quality by trademarks and place of origin is essentially an extension of trademark. I don't really have a problem with it.

[-] amju_wolf@pawb.social 3 points 1 year ago

If it wasn't strictly bound to origin but could be, say, at least "licensed out" (perhaps with the places of origin still at least getting a small cut) it could be a win-win-win.

But as it is it's just artificially inflating prices of goods that are potentially just as good (or in some cases potentially even worse) than some alternatives.

[-] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

You do understand that quality isn't based on who produced it, but on the product itself, right? Cheese doesn't suddenly get better because it has the Parmesan trademark. Quality is supposed to be an objective measure of the thing itself.

[-] roguetrick@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Maybe my argument wasn't as plainitively obvious as I thought it was. The only way to develop an opinion on quality is to personally trust the supplier or rely on trademarks. Without either you will not know if you're getting the same product and quality will vary wildly. In an open market, the only way is to rely on trademarks. Place of origin is an extension of the trademark system.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] pjhenry1216@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

No, quality is independent of location of production. Proof of the pudding is in the eating as they say. Reputation is tied to the producer. Quality is tied to an individual instance of the product. Thats why certain things have QA tags. This technology doesn't represent quality. It only verifies sourcing.

[-] Master@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

As long as the counterfeit cheese meets all production regulations and is safe to eat I dont care. But the truth is the counterfeit probably cut amlot of corners and isn't that safe and if people get sick will be much harder to track and prevent future issues.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 5BC2E7@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I am ok with “imitations” that follow the same process but it gets really specific when it’s about the weather in a specific region making. You can reproduce the same environment and bacterias but to get it just like the original it’s probably a lot more difficult than to make the product in its traditional “authentic” setting. Unless it allows increased production it’s difficult to see how it would be commercially viable. So in practice they cut corners and it’s not as good as the real one.

[-] Nawor3565@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 1 year ago

This is literally just a type of NFC. The same type of thing that's used whenever you scan your credit card or use an Amiibo. It is interesting that it doesn't use RFID standards, but conceptually it's the same idea of an ultra-low-power chip with an antenna with the only purpose being to transmit a few bytes of data when scanned.

[-] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 13 points 1 year ago

I think the appeal here is the chip is uncloneable, unlike ordinary rfid tags, so counterfeit products can't just clone it serial number. I wonder how useful it is in practice though. Unlike RFID tags which can be scanned by phones, customers probably don't have the proprietary scanner in hand to scan this chip, right? How do you know your cheese wheel is fake or not in that situation. You'll probably have to trust the store you bought it from, but if the store want to sell fake product, adding this chip to real products probably won't prevent those fraudulent stores from selling fake products to their customers. Am I missing something here?

[-] BitSound@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Also, it's claimed that it's uncloneable. We'll see how well that actually stands up to a counterfeit market with lots of money to throw at it

[-] lemann@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

They'd need a crap ton of money to throw at it lol, especially if the cheese makers decide to use Mifare NFC tech. That relies on the chips being signed using a write-once private key, and optionally also returning a kind of OTP that is only known to the NFC chip when it's sent a special command or "challenge".

Transit cards and contact less/chipped bank cards rely on something similar to prevent cloning (although Bank cards are actually running a Java-based OS, and can perform more complex calculations, or even just applications as programmed by the bank)

I'd be shocked if they picked some insecure type of nfc tech lol, or relied on the chip IDs which are easily cloneable

[-] olivier@lemmy.fait.ch 8 points 1 year ago

End users (so to speak) usally don't buy full parmesan wheels, anyway ;)

[-] roguetrick@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Not near field, since it uses photovoltaic cells with a pulsed laser for power.

[-] Sh1nyM3t4l4ss@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Can't wait to play DOOM on a cheese wheel

[-] victron@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

Cheesing through demons, hell yeah

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 year ago

I can definitely get on board with this cheese to chip ratio

[-] saltnotsugar@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago

“How did they get root access to the parmesan wheels!?” -Future cheese hacker film

[-] SquiffSquiff@lemmy.sdf.org 16 points 1 year ago

They were members of the wheel group

[-] ezures@lemmy.wtf 2 points 1 year ago

they were know as the hacker 4cheese

[-] roguetrick@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

The photocells, when illuminated by a pulsed laser, provide power to the electronic circuits on the chip with ~10% efficiency. The chip transmits its ID through modulated current in the antenna. The varying magnetic field around the chip is received by a nearby coil in the reader, and the signal is digitized, analyzed, and decoded.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5896163/

So it's security is that it's not near field based but photovoltaic based. You'd have to copy it's design to clone it.

[-] otter@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago

That's pretty cool even without the cheesy factor

[-] HenriHenr@feddit.de 13 points 1 year ago
[-] akai@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Ya know, the concept of cheese DRM never even crossed my mind...

[-] flameguy21@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

How in the hell do you counterfeit CHEESE????

[-] Bye@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

They make it somewhere else, and pass it off as if it’s made in a region with a protected name. For example, making sparkling wine in California and saying it’s champagne.

[-] independantiste@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago

We should have done that with poutine...

[-] kate@lemmy.uhhoh.com 2 points 1 year ago

omg cheese fraud is real??

[-] shiveyarbles@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Bah! Foiled again!

[-] StarServal@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Finally! 5gs to go with my five cheese.

[-] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Terminator: Gorgonzola Annihilation

[-] Havald@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Inb4 local Discounter süd because customer accidentally ate microchip

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Its micro-transponders can add tracking and authentication to electronics and computing goods, product packaging, automotive components, and more.

This statement certainly applies in 2023, with people packing ubiquitous smart devices, many household goods becoming intelligent and connected, and the relentless march of the (A)IoT.

When a modulated laser pulse scans the chip, power goes through its circuits and transmits a unique code via ultra-low radio frequency waves.

According to the maker, p-Chip devices are smaller, cheaper (a few cents each), tougher, and more secure than nearest competitor RFID.

Italy's parmesan makers are testing this technology, with over 100,000 cheeses maturing for the past year with p-Chips micro-transponders in the rind.

This testing phase has been deemed necessary as the years-long maturation process for the cheese, including hot saltwater immersion, can degrade alternatives like QR codes and RFID tags.


The original article contains 424 words, the summary contains 138 words. Saved 67%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
177 points (90.8% liked)

Technology

34821 readers
15 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS