720
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] simplejack@lemmy.world 235 points 1 month ago

LTT vs Google.

I’ll side with LLT on this, but that doesn’t mean I want to support their channel.

[-] Potatisen@lemmy.world 53 points 1 month ago

Why? What did LTT do?

Out of the loop on this.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 214 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Quick summary, probably missing a lot, but...

  • Two-ish years ago they decided to sell an overpriced backpack with no warranty. This was criticized considering everything else in the same price/quality categories would have lifetime warranties. This led to Linus Sebastien going on a rant about how warranties are worthless and people should just trust him and that anyone who wanted a warranty was going to threaten his wife (the CFO and one of the major shareholders) were he to die. LMG eventually walked back and provided a pretty good warranty but this is largely considered the "masks off" moment
  • One-ish years ago, during a fan tour one of the engineers in Lab (LMG's hardware testing warehouse) criticized Hardware Unboxed and Gamers Nexus with some (actually false) nonsense claims about how LMG do their testing and why it makes them better than everyone else. After this blew up, Linus went on his podcast to say he stands by the engineer.
  • Needless to say, GN and HUB took that personally and it led to GN doing one of their industry takedown videos (usually reserved for MSI or ASUS) on LMG with lots of documented examples of downright comedic levels of incompetence in how they review hardware and present results that point toward systemic issues that undermine all the orgs who actually take benchmarking and the like seriously. Look up the video, but it is stuff like not taking the plastic off a mouse (and then complaining about how it feels) or listing complete nonsense numbers for RAM that anyone with half a (computer parts) brain would have said "that can't be right".
  • Also, GN pointed out that one of the most egregious examples was the recent one where LMG were sent a prototype GPU cooler and a GPU to review. LMG proceeded to "lose" the card they were sent and use a random different model for the test and then shit on the product endlessly while insisting it doesn't matter that they didn't actually test it because it was a shit product. They then sold the prototype at their convention to an unknown party. All while ghosting the company and ignoring their requests for the prototype back.
  • This led to "drama" where Linus, on the LTT Forums, accused Steve (GN) of being biased and a horribly unprofessional reporter for not giving LMG a chance to get ahead of the accusations and insisted they had already addressed all the issues. Which was later revealed to be that they finally replied to the GPU Cooler company literally minutes before Linus posted to gaslight people.
  • Also, as part of this, a former employee (Madison) who had left mysteriously spoke out about the sexual harassment and assault she experienced at LMG. This was consistent with vagueposting by other female former staff when referencing their time at LMG.
  • The harassment was corroborated by other former staff (one has since recanted after he couldn't find a new job in the kind of blog post that would make even John Xina himself raise an eyebrow) and audio of her manager (James Streib) making stripper jokes to the entire company during the company mandated sexual harassment seminar THE DAY AFTER MADISON QUIT BECAUSE OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT re-surfaced. Streib is still the face of one of the LMG channels.
  • This ALSO reminded people of when, OG of Maker Youtube and 3d Printing, Naomi Wu spoke about how Linus had insisted she come to his hotel room at like 3 am if she wanted to do a collaboration and that it made her feel uncomfortable. Allegedly this was all a big misunderstanding and Linus only accidentally removed his wife from the email chain, but Naomi is used to that shit and had much bigger stuff (like the CCP...) to deal with when this was resurfacing.

And just general douche-baggery.

But mostly? It just means to take anything LMG does with a massive grain of salt. They have repeatedly demonstrated that they are not above manipulating their audience and influence to push anti-consumer behavior. So a video where they were "too spicy" for Google for promoting alternatives (some of which LMG themselves operate) is, to quote the children, sus. And yeah, it sounds like the issue has nothing to do with "don't use gmail or youtube" and all to do with "use this random third party app that bypasses all the ads so you can still use youtube".

[-] chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago

“use this random third party app that bypasses all the ads so you can still use youtube”.

This has always been my beef with Rossman. He always has something to sell--not just sponsored content--his own apps and solutions. He comes off like a used car salesman, just pushing the hard sell and making you feel like an idiot for not jumping at the chance to give him money. I'm sure he has made some positive movement in privacy and right to repair, but every time he talks I just feel like he's going to try to get me to sign up for a timeshare. I don't trust him.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 31 points 1 month ago

Rossman is a different mess, but I think it is undeniable that he has been a net positive on r2r over the years. And I think he will continue to be as long as he is someone that outlets like GN and even LMG collaborate with or reference but minimally platform.

But yeah. I think Rossman is genuinely a free speech absolutist with strong libertarian tendencies. Stuff like his "I don't care if that amazon delivery driver was racist or not, this is unacceptable" just undermines his efforts. Same with his never ending hatred of NYC because he ran a business into the ground. Also his tendency to push immediately from "ads bad" to "STEAL THAT SHIT".

Like, I immediately think of THAT Dril quote, but I do have to give it up to LMG from like three or four years ago. The idea that people SHOULD be aware of how to run adblockers and even dns level adblockers. But to also understand that they are pirating content (whether that is bad is up to the individual) and that some sites are going to block them or not work. Because that is honest and "real". And it provides a conversation that can be had between companies and consumers.

Whereas Rossman has increasingly been "If they aren't going to let you block ads, fuck 'em. Pay a different company to let you access their content without ads or giving them money" which just paints everyone who cares about privacy as a childish pirate with no respect for the work of others.

[-] xenoclast@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago

I agree. He's not perfect but I think he's coming from the right side of things.

Ultimately antics that get clicks still motivate what he does tho

[-] dev_null@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Great summary! Here is the other side of the debate:

  • The backpack is overengineered and spares no expense in materials and durability, making it expensive. It is not overpriced. It may be unreasonably costly and not worth the purchase. The reason being it costs a lot to manufacture, not because it's overpriced.

  • Linus was stupid in his "no warranty needed" claim, as most people won't (and shouldn't) take his word for it. Nevertheless, it is true his store always replaced items without issue and continues to do so, warranty or not. The customer experience is generally much better than the average store, where you may have to fight for your warranty claim only for it to be refused anyway. This is what he meant. If stores are not honoring warranties, and his store is accepting returns without a warranty anyway, then what's the piece of paper worth anyway? But people like the piece of mind it provides, they learned the lesson and are providing it now. Of course the warranty never mattered either way.

  • I did buy the backpack. Months later I received a replacement set of zippers. There is nothing wrong with the original zippers, they just felt these ones are better and people who bought the backpack before the change should get them too. This has never happened to me with another purchase in my life, where the store decided to upgrade it for free and ship it to another continent for free, without me asking.

  • Months later they discovered the material used for the backpack floor isn't what they wanted. So they offered me (and all purchasers) a full refund and additional store credit. Nobody noticed the issue, nobody asked for refunds. They discovered it and offered refunds proactively, even though it's a non-issue. Again never happen in my life with another purchase.

  • Shitty for the employee to shit on GN. Commendable for Linus to stand by his employee publicly instead of blaming him.

  • You are correct they had lot of quality issues. It is also worth mentioning their overhaul that happened after that, improved processed, slowed down upload cadence, and the formation of volunteer "beta tester" viewers who watch videos pre-release to find errors not found internally. Good for them to try to improve.

  • Auctioning off the prototype cooler was quite egregious! As usual Linus took the heat on himself and never named the responsible employee who misallocated the cooler in their inventory.

  • A third party investigation found the sexual harassment allegations unfounded. Due to the nature of this we might never know the details though.

  • Linus invited Naomi to meet him in the meeting rooms of his hotel's lobby, which exist specifically for business meetings. She later untruthfully misrepresented it as an invite to his hotel room.

  • In general, the transparency at which their business operates makes it very easy to point out flaws. I think it's better than the opaque businesses where this can't happen.

  • I agree with these of your points I didn't address.

Hope this provides both sides for readers, and thanks again.

[-] Metalemming@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

Didnt they find out about the backpack floor BECAUSE one of the customers wore through the floor? I believe i remember linus telling them that "wasnt possible" or something to that effect before recieving the backpack in question and finding out the manufacturer removed the second layer they had requested because they thought it was a mistake

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] PopOfAfrica@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I love how they only ever really paraphrased the report and never showed us on the sexual harassment allegations. Bill Barr behavior

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 month ago

The one where they hired a lawyer (that i think was infamous for protecting the Canadian logging industry)?

Yeah. That is always bullshit. Unless you are doing REALLY illegal stuff AND are documenting it to an insane level, lawyers are not mandatory reporters. Their job is not to prove there was no wrongdoing. Their job is to investigate what risk the company is at to wrongdoing that, as far as they have been told, did not exist. And their report is the risk based upon documented evidence and interviews with employees.

So when a company does a third party investigation from a law firm they paid? They are not getting a clean bill of health. They are having all potential risks identified and doing what they can to mitigate that.

A very good friend of mine who tends to be on the other side of the court room when this stuff happens likes to describe it as: Paying a law firm to investigate your company is not an STD test. It is confirming that you don't have any weeping sores and making sure you have plausible deniability for why all your condoms keep "falling off" while you stealth people.

But people hear "We investigated ourselves and found no sign of wrongdoing" and think it means... anything.

[-] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 month ago

Oh man, I totally forgot about the Naomi Wu drama. I remember it kind of resolved in some way with some explanations of Linus maybe making some sense if you were generous. But under the light of everything that came after, eh, maybe it was serious after all.

[-] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago

I think it was mostly that Naomi dropped it after excessive amounts of harassment. And Linus's excuse was that she misunderstood him and it is her problem for thinking that a guy saying he would only give her a business opportunity if she came to his bedroom at 3 am was sketchy. And his wife was totally CC'd to some of those emails anyway.

I recall there was a different (not going to speculate on who the timeline would line up with...) case where Linus was accused of sexual assault (possibly outright rape?) where his defense was that he was a virgin until he met his wife which... okay.

As it stands, it is basically proven that the company has severe cultural issues regarding sexual harassment and bad workplace dynamics. The sexual assault accusations are still very much in the "where there is smoke..." range. And it is why I point out that Madison's harassment claims were corroborated by former employees but her assault claims were not.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 9 points 1 month ago

"Trust me bro" and "I think individual smart light bulbs are a good idea" were when I had to put LTT in the Jays 2 cents corner of shame.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] mlg@lemmy.world 38 points 1 month ago

Other than the stuff already mentioned here, people (probably fairly accurately) thought Linus was a salesman douche with no real knowledge of computers back in the NCIX days.

It was partially true, he was basically a warehouse manager who happened to get lucky making a successful youtube channel which he turned into his own media business after NCIX died.

But that's what the key term is. It's Linus Media Group. Their top goal is to create content that generates views for revenue, and not content that might be useful or takes a lot of effort to do.

Which is why you will almost never see any heavy IT people watching his videos. There are so many examples of people running entire data centers in their house better than LMG could do with actual budget, server space, and hardware. They used to use windows server for everything because they didn't have anyone who knew linux lol.

[-] dragonlobster@programming.dev 24 points 1 month ago

Of course their biggest scandal was rushing content and not being diligent with their benchmarks. I honestly never had the impression that they were really the professionals or experts they present themselves to be.

That being said, I think if you view their videos more as entertainment and an entry level content into the IT world for people who otherwise wouldn't be interested, their content is acceptable.

I wouldn't watch their videos expecting to learn anything or trusting their expertise/benchmarks, but just for the vibes. Luckily we have real experts like tech jesus to keep them in check. I also think people who actually seek to learn something will eventually figure out LTT ain't it.

[-] Delphia@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

LTT is tech content like Donut media is Automotive content. It's edutainment at most.

I find it funny the amount of hate that LTT gets, it's niche entertainment and you can watch it absolutely free anywhere in the world and Linus rejected a 9 figure sum to keep ownership of something he built, say that out loud... "He turned down over $100,000,000." Yes they flog merch and have floatplane and all that bullshit but that's how they stay independent.

You can take Donut and Motortrend as examples of how it all goes to shit. MT were YT only, then moved to their own paid streaming platform, then sold out to a network and told all their international subscribers to kick rocks because the network deal was more money.

Or the Donut route, where you get bought by venture capital who suck all the fun out of the job, try to monetise everything and wind up having all the talent leave and go start their own channels because they took a fun job and just made it a job.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] simplejack@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They’ve been criticized of rushing and skimping on accurate / ethical review practices. There are also allegations that LTT is a fairly toxic work environment, but, the former has more concrete evidence since the janky reviews were recorded and uploaded.

And on a more subjective note, a lot of people aren’t really into the way that Linus behaves on camera. I’m in this camp. I find that he often comes off pretty arrogant and belittling when he’s interacting with his staff on camera.

[-] drcobaltjedi@programming.dev 11 points 1 month ago

And on a more subjective note, a lot of people aren’t really into the way that Linus behaves on camera. I’m in this camp. I find that he often comes off pretty arrogant and belittling when he’s interacting with his staff on camera.

I remember on the old site years ago saying that Linus came off as a bit of a douchebag and being downvoted to hell for it. Like, I get having relationships with friends where we're always bullying each other a bit, but it never seemed to me like he was ever on the recieving end of that.

[-] simplejack@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Yeah, as someone who has been in people management for a long time, he has a way of interacting with people that makes my HR spidey sense tingle.

It’s very subtle, but there some ways of collaborating and communicating with his employees that I’ve seen before, and are often associated with people who get shitty reviews from the ICs and peers.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] yesman@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

I left when every other video was about the personal lives of Linus or his staff. I know that developing the parasocial is important to any channel, but it turns me off.

[-] deafboy@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

I actually like those, and started to watch the channel regularly after the house remodeling series.

What's barely sufferable are the "we bought stuff from the internet and here it is. check out our sponsor..." videos that's been published a lot lately.

[-] xenoclast@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Right? I learned how to block channel in FreeTube motivated entirely so I don't have to see his stupid face in my recommendations

I feel like we'll find out this was engineered for clicks by them.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 110 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

For visibility, here is a list of ways around youtube ads the video was supposedly banned for mentioning:

Desktop:

Android:

I personally use Freetube and think it's great

[-] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 1 month ago

Firefox with uBlock Origin also works nicely.

[-] sapetoku@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 month ago

Also SponsoBlock

[-] Lizardking27@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[-] Hedlosa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 month ago

I use pipepipe off fdroid and love it, it even has sponsorblock built in if you enable it!

Problem #00001: Relying on googlevideo in order to obtain information on how to avoid Google.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] tpihkal@lemmy.world 48 points 1 month ago

I just bought a Google Pixel!

So that I can install GrapheneOS on it.

[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

I wish it didn’t have to be that way, lol. Can’t we have some quality third party hardware?

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Quik@infosec.pub 15 points 1 month ago

This is sooooo incredibly sad!!! I’m currently on an older iPhone and probably getting a Pixel next month; I would really have liked it if there were a bigger variety of phones where I could live truly Google-free, and I would much prefer not having to give Google money to not be reliant on Google…

[-] theskyisfalling@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago

Buy second hand or refurbished. Better for the planet, cheaper and you aren't directly giving google anything :)

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] mesamunefire@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago

Here is the video in question.

Hopefully it stays up. If not, someone might want to push to archive.org / peertube /etc...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gPa8NpmhKM0

[-] Beacon@fedia.io 19 points 1 month ago

I hope this gets the streisand effect, but it's probably too geeky of a topic for that

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] timewarp@lemmy.world 22 points 1 month ago

Was it about how to live without Google or how to bypass ads on YouTube?

[-] B1ackmsth@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 month ago

The video that was removed talked about blocking ads on YouTube which goes against contract terms for YouTubers. The one about switching away from Google service is still up.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CombatWombat1212@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 month ago

This dude is so smart but has literally the worst vibes I just can't stand him for no reason lmfao

[-] dumbass@leminal.space 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I fully agree with and love what he does for the repair industry, but im with ya on that, I cant stand him either. Its a weird feeling.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
720 points (97.4% liked)

Videos

14250 readers
152 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed

Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS