64
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Zangoose@lemmy.world 7 points 17 hours ago

Tbf this title is incredibly clickbaited. In the actual article they say they bought Tango and Hi-Fi rush because they thought the art was worth keeping alive, not because it would make money.

[-] tb_@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

I mean, that's what the title says?

It isn't all that clickbait-y.

[-] Rekorse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 hour ago

Only by comparison to worse ones. Its absolutely misleading at best.

[-] tb_@lemmy.world 2 points 59 minutes ago

they say they bought Tango and Hi-Fi rush because they thought the art was worth keeping alive, not because it would make money.

The title says how it's not about money, but about (presumably) Tango's legacy. So.. their art. It's the same thing.

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago

I don't see why it couldn't. It had twice the value of other high-profile Microsoft releases but cost half as much. Put out another one, flesh out the friend attack systems, and charge what it's actually worth. Without Game Pass eating into copies sold, you should be able to make money off of a $60 release, surely.

[-] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago

I know why...

Krafton's semiannual report on the 11th, CEO Kim Chang-han received 481 million won in salary and 2.795 billion won in bonuses in the first half of this year. Kim's total salary for the first half of the year was 528 million won last year. It is about five times higher than the same period last year.Aug 14, 2023

The guy who makes too much money is saying he can't make more. That's all, not that the game won't be profitable, just that he can't make MORE money.

[-] Zangoose@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

The article is clickbaited with an out-of-context quote. He isn't making an excuse, he's saying that it was worth saving Tango (and Hi-Fi rush) for their originality and artistic value, even though he says it might not technically be profitable from an acquisition standpoint

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I mean, if we assume that guy makes 6 billion won per year, that's less than $5M USD. You could absolutely turn around a sequel to Hi-Fi Rush and profit by significantly more than that. It's not like it would be a drop in the bucket.

[-] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago

This game was only good for 4-5 hours, imo. Hi-fi rush was a refreshing concept that attracted attention because it stood out in a sea of similar looking titles that the mainstream has become. But they didn't follow through on the player feedback for such a creative leap in gameplay. It really shows when they start piling on new gameplay mechanics, and combat stops being fun and becomes a mess of awkward controls and spazzy cameras and frustrating vertically-aligned jumping.

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 7 points 21 hours ago

What player feedback? The game shadow dropped. I loved it start to finish, and it was so good that it got me to go back and play old DMC games. So far, I still prefer HFR to all of those.

[-] FunnyUsername@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

I'm glad you liked it, but the two camps are definitely "this game is a masterpiece" and "this game combat is overbloated and feels sloppy". Just check the negative steam reviews, they eco similar sentiments to each other

[-] ampersandrew@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Given that it's pushing 90 on OpenCritic, I think they got more people in the masterpiece camp. And I think it's fair to say that it attracted attention because plenty of people found it to be a masterpiece.

[-] Mango@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago

Let's prove them wrong and keep buying this game yo! It's legit good.

[-] SassyRamen@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

I hate the first one, don't plan on playing the second

[-] Mango@lemmy.world -1 points 19 hours ago
[-] SassyRamen@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

Shouldn't you be in gamingcirclejerk? Sometimes people have other opinions and that's okay.

[-] Mango@lemmy.world -4 points 16 hours ago

Shouldn't you be a therapist? Only therapists talk like that and this here isn't the therapist specific place.

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Nobody saved my beloved Roll7. :-(

[-] Carnelian@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I’m still crying about that :( olli olli world is such an incredible fucking game. I had just bought rollerdrome when I heard the news

[-] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

I have countless hours on Olli Olli 2. I literally killed one PS Vita and two dual shock controllers playing that game.

this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2024
64 points (95.7% liked)

Games

16407 readers
1433 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS