I love trolling over silly policy decisions!
Joking aside, I think "insertive" and "receptive" work just fine while also being more technically accurate.
The justification for the change might make ones eyes roll, because we are talking about plugs not people, but if the alternative is just as easy while also being correct, it's really no skin off my nose to use different words.
That's just my perspective though.

male/female did always seem weird to me to call plugs. It would be better if they were just called insertive/receptive. It's much more self-explanatory and appropriate.

NEMA has called them "plugs" and "receptacles" for decades.

Incidentally, there's a reasonably wide range of connectors that don't fit traditional identities. Some, like most USB connectors, have a situation where there's a male prong in the middle of a 'female' connector.

Others, like Anderson Powerpole, are fully self-mating.

I couldn't tell you. It's our internal systems after all.

Still better than SharePoint.

Ah hem... it's business central now, and all bugs have totally been worked out - stable AF 🫠

More likely a single Excel file somewhere on the network shared by the entire company. It's grrrrreat!

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

https://piped.video/kRcdmbC0HHs?feature=shared

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

woosh

Next thing, you gonna tell us SSLv3 isn't military grade?!

Exactly, real infosec engineers use crc32