37

Looks like the latest plan is to demand that Ukraine joins NATO so they can invoke article 5. I doubt that will happen because it would basically mean either going directly to war with Russia or admitting that article 5 is meaningless.

https://archive.is/FL758

top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Mzuark@lemmygrad.ml 19 points 1 month ago

What is this groundhog day? This story comes out every few weeks

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 17 points 1 month ago

nobody accused these people of having any original ideas

[-] l0tusc0bra@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

lmao right?? I feel like I've been hearing this one every week since 2021. I sometimes wonder how aware he actually is

[-] supersolid_snake@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Lol yeah America is gonna be like, we have to fight our own wars and honor article 5 due to our longstanding tradition of honoring agreements and treaties. Holy shit, people are so delusional.

The only time America fights post wwii is when they think they are up against weak peasants they can obliterate.

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 1 month ago

I find it incredible how all the US vassals think they're going to be the one special case where they're somehow indispensable.

[-] supersolid_snake@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 1 month ago

The geopolitical I can fix her.

[-] CyberMonkey404@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

admitting that article 5 is meaningless.

IIRC article 5 doesn't actually demand immediate military action. It demands nato members to collectively decide on a course of action, which is collectively considered best for the defence of the member in question. Aka they could just decide to continue what they are already doing - send weapons, munitions, train terror troops, provide direct Intel and targeting data, provide airfields for jets, etc. What's missing here that could be magically improved by nato membership? Nukes? Uniformed yankee soldiers on the ground?

[-] yogthos@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 1 month ago

That's correct, article 5 doesn't actually stipulate that members must engage militarily. Each country can decide on its level of support independently. However, what matters is perception. Currently, western public believes that article 5 is an ironclad guarantee that NATO members will be collectively defended. If a NATO member is left to hang, then it becomes clear that being a member of NATO doesn't actually provide any meaningful protection. At that point NATO is exposed as the protection racket that it is.

[-] PoY@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 1 month ago

dream on zelensky

this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2024
37 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2307 readers
110 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS