190
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 83 points 2 months ago

Paid more to appear than most make in a year. How conservative.

[-] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 50 points 2 months ago

Well, but think about the value created. They needed to demonstrate their candidate is in a healthy, stable, supportive marriage and definitely not banging some neo-nazi side chick. Her appearance was basically priceless, surprised she didn't ask for more.

[-] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

How sadly true.

[-] David_Eight@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago

Another immigrant stealing black jobs!

[-] SidewaysHighways@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

I love the rhyme

[-] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 months ago

Meh. One of the big problems with Hillary was her speaking fees.

[-] phdepressed@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 months ago

Why? Trump's speaking fees even then were 4x higher and he hadn't done shit to talk about.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago

I wouldn't be surprised if the Trump campaign pays Trump himself to speak at campaign events

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago

That would be 100% in character.

[-] Weirdmusic@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

She really is a prostitute, isn't she?

[-] Coelacanth@feddit.nu 26 points 2 months ago

I don't think there is anything particularly wrong with that, I just wish she was more discerning when selecting her clientele.

[-] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago

She picked a bunch of gay, probably self loathing republicans. Sounds like an easy gig if you’re female.

[-] Atelopus-zeteki@fedia.io 15 points 2 months ago

"The former first lady spoke at two political fundraisers for the Log Cabin Republicans this year, and she was paid $237,500 for an April event, according to former President Donald Trump’s latest financial disclosure form. The payment was listed as a “speaking engagement.” "

[-] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 18 points 2 months ago

How the fuck are there still Log Cabin Republicans?

I smell bullshit. No way a bunch of Gay Republicans paid her a quarter million.

And that is a weirdly specific number.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

Peter Thiel is gay. And Republican. He would certainly have the funds to pay Melania if he wanted.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

And that is a weirdly specific number.

when you're told to launder money, you launder the money.

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 12 points 2 months ago

Was the person who cut the check named Theter Piel?

[-] MrMcGasion@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Not saying 6 figures isn't an insane amount of money for a speaking fee, but Obama was getting $400,000 in 2017. Obama is arguably a better speaker, and Melania doesn't get as many gigs as Obama did (there was a period in 2017 when he did 3 events within a couple months, which caused quite a bit of outrage on the right about his speaking fee), but 6 figures isn't all that unusual for former Presidents/First Ladies (Michelle's is reportedly around $200,000).

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Probably someone who's last name starts with a T and ends with his rump?

Or, the new Nabisco Crispy Trumps! They got real curly trump hair taste for your beautiful republican morning meals!

Trump can't cut a 6-figure check.

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Nah. He gotta cash that ✅. Would you be interested in new silver boots 🥾 with Trump logo on them?

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -1 points 2 months ago

CNN - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for CNN:

MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Mostly Factual - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.cnn.com/2024/09/23/politics/melania-trump-speaking-engagements
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2024
190 points (97.5% liked)

politics

19148 readers
1932 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS