Winamp releases source code, asks for help modernizing the player (www.bleepingcomputer.com)

submitted 9 months ago by geese_feces@hexbear.net to c/technology@hexbear.net

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Yesterday, the Winamp source code, build tools, and associated libraries for the Windows app were published on GitHub, allowing anyone to provide bug fixes and new features to the iconic media player.

However, its license prohibits the distribution of modified software created through the release of this source code.

https://github.com/WinampDesktop/winamp

all 23 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[+] 12022081631@hexbear.net 35 points 9 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

[deleted]

[-] rtstragedy@hexbear.net 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

yes, that license is unfortunate... i am not a license expert, but "private use only" modifications is sad to me. i mean, the difference with the GPL is just that contribs need to be upstreamed, right? that seems like a better balance, if so?

[-] thisismyrealname@hexbear.net 16 points 9 months ago

the GPL does not require upstreaming. it would allow for anyone to redistribute Winamp with whatever modifications they like, provided they publish their source code under the GPL. the license Winamp is using is not even an open-source license since it explicitly forbids public redistribution. dumb move, they should have just used MIT or GPL and retained rights to the logo or something

[-] rtstragedy@hexbear.net 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

thank you, good post. I was going to make a sassy comment about Winamp being "source-available" (derogatory) but it's helpful to have you explain this instead, appreciate it. (I am a software dev, but I struggle with licenses etc.)

[-] notfromhere@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 months ago

Just make a repo containing only changes, no original source, with instructions anyone can use to create their own version with community changes applied?

[-] ExtimateCookie@hexbear.net 28 points 9 months ago

This is not open source. In open source people contribute to the project and in return the code belongs to anyone who likes to take it and work on it. Here they are asking for contribution while fully owning the code. It's basically free labor

[-] Beetle_O_Rourke@hexbear.net 22 points 9 months ago

asks for community help

blob-no

[-] FuckyWucky@hexbear.net 14 points 9 months ago

🦙

[-] fossilesque@mander.xyz 10 points 9 months ago

I'm so happy

[-] Taster_Of_Treats@hexbear.net 10 points 9 months ago

Fuck you, pay me (in free licence or money)

[-] ashinadash@hexbear.net 7 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Why this when WACUP exists already?

E: Just discovered WACUP is only partially open source? Damb that sucks. Hope this release could help WACUP but seems unlikely. Maybe it would help them understand the core they'e working with better?

Also the people who used DirectX for a media player.........

[-] frauddogg@hexbear.net 6 points 9 months ago

Honestly I'm just waiting for an open source player to ape WinAmp's style with a different name and logo so I can stop using WinAmp as my go-to non-spotify music program

I do not like running my music through VLC lmao

[-] ashinadash@hexbear.net 6 points 9 months ago

yea I use Strawberry on Linux but it's not similar at all sadly

[-] SpiderFarmer@hexbear.net 5 points 9 months ago

lets-fucking-go

this post was submitted on 25 Sep 2024

84 points (97.7% liked)

technology

23862 readers

14 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

context@hexbear.net

EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net

SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net

gaycomputeruser@hexbear.net

ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net