209

Covid on the rise as experts say England has ‘capitulated’ to the virus (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 1 month ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

29 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Immunologists push for increase in testing and more widespread vaccine booster rollout as new variant, XEC, emerges

Covid is on the rise in England, and experts have warned that more must be done to prevent and control infections after a "capitulation to the virus".

Prof Danny Altmann, an immunologist at Imperial College London, said those working in the field were perplexed by the current attitude to the battle against Covid, as the latest figures showed an increase in hospital admissions.

The latest data for England from the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) showed that hospital admissions increased to 3.71 per 100,000 population for the week between 16 and 22 September 2024, compared with 2.56 per 100,000 the previous week.

The percentage of people with symptoms who have tested positive for Covid, based on tests at sentinel "spotter" laboratories, has also risen in the last week to 11.8% compared with 9.1% in the previous week.

all 30 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] mox@lemmy.sdf.org 46 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Our capitulation to the virus is a combination of a population where most are now many months or years from their last vaccine dose, and that vaccine dose was in any case poorly cross-protective for the very distinct current variants.

I think most people don't realize just how important that first part is. Many seem to believe a dose will keep them safe (and no longer dangerous to others) for at least a year, but that's a mistake. Even our best Covid vaccines don't protect for years or decades like the vaccines we're accustomed to from childhood.

Immunity from these new shots wanes rapidly, reaching less than 20% effectiveness after just 6 months.

[-] Rhaedas@fedia.io 16 points 1 month ago

Keep in mind that being immunized protects you from developing worse conditions, not from getting it at all. Which also means you can absolutely be a carrier to others, you just won't have it at a bad level for as long to be contagious. And the new strain is apparently more contagious (but possibly less of the rest) this time. Just wanted to add that in, because some people read the "immun" part and assume they can't get anything. Avoiding infection is always the best way, with vaccination as protection if/when you do get it anyway.

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

not exactly true, it does help prevent infection and transmission. not 100% but significantly.

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/preventing-transmission-never-required-covid-vaccines-initial-approval-pfizer-2024-02-12/

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.abl4292

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

i think the unfortunate reality is that most people are never going to get yearly-ish vaccines.

UNLESS it’s made very easy for them, like at work. that’s what i would be pushing for as an employer, its in my best interest to keep my employees healthy after all. bring in a provider to give shots for free in the office.

my wife works for a fairly liberal non profit. luckily they are mostly remote now, but they have a massive conference coming up soon and i am shocked that they haven’t been encouraging vaccines leading up to it. i mention to my wife every year she should suggest it but it never seems to go anywhere.

[-] insaneinthemembrane@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

In my country the vaccine is unavailable publicly or privately to most people. I'm considering travelling to try to buy it. It's fucking insane. I can buy a vaccine for pretty much anything else.

[-] AnagrammadiCodeina@feddit.it 1 points 1 month ago

This way you can also understand who is a foilhat retarded compared to who is taking it, for free, on company time, like it normally should be

[-] Saleh@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago

Which does raise the question, if the mRNA route is a sufficient solution in the long run. IIRC coronaviruses are supposed to be much less active in mutating compared to influenza. The reason why influenze requires a new shot every year is because it is a new variation every year.

It is simply not viable to vaccinate large parts of the population every six months. And quite frankly there couldn't be a better propaganda for anti-vaxxer than telling people to get the shot twice a year.

[-] palordrolap@fedia.io 29 points 1 month ago

The reason people aren't bothering is that we've gone all USA healthcare with regard to the vaccines. If you want one, find a pharmacy that will provide one and be prepared to cough up at least £40. And be sure to shop around and/or be prepared to travel because some places charge £100.

A whole lot of people don't have even the low end of that kind of money, even if "the right thing to do" would be to make sacrifices - like, say, go cold or hungry for a couple of weeks, how hard could that be? - in order to make sure they get it. And then do the same again every six months from now until something else kills them.

And even if someone has £100 to spare, that's a lot of money that could be spent on something other than feeling like crap for three days.

There are exemptions (i.e. free vaccines) for those over 64, the infirm, and health workers, but the rest of us can suck it, apparently.

Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-55045639

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 19 points 1 month ago

Amusingly, as an American, one thing that is 100% covered by my insurance is vaccines. Getting the Covid, flu, and RSV vaccines next week for free.

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

which makes sense because vaccines reduce healthcare costs!

[-] vovo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Sadly thats not the case in Germany. Quite likely you wont have to pay for it, but its not official for boosters if you're middle-aged and healthy.

[-] Drusas@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

It makes no sense at all for preventative medicine like vaccinations not to be 100% covered. They reduce costs in the long term, so everyone wins.

[-] palordrolap@fedia.io 1 points 1 month ago

Paid healthcare does exist here. We call it "private healthcare", and there's usually a regular subscription fee if not also insurance. I'm sure for those of us who have that, there are plans where you get vaccines thrown in as a "freebie", but those people are probably paying more than £100 every six months for the privilege.

[-] nao@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 month ago

not only England

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Strange photo. Isn’t that swab supposed to go up the nose for a Covid test? Or do they do it differently in the UK?

[-] egrets@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I don't know about other countries' tests, but some in the UK are just nasal swabs, others are both tonsils and nose. The earlier tests - in my area, at least - were tonsil and nose swabs.

[-] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 3 points 1 month ago

Those early tests were hell.

I shook like a little bitch after mine.

People don’t understand how good they have it now

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Tonsil swabs? You have got to be kidding me. Don't people puke all the time?

[-] azimir@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

It wasn't fun, that's for sure.

[-] RootBeerGuy@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

The at home tests are often still asking for nasal swabs but actually you can detect the virus in a mouth swab just as well.

At the company where I work we got provided free testing and over the pandemic period they transitioned the test from nasal to mouth swab with no issues.

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

That 2002 movie just got the title wrong. Looks like it was supposed to be 22 Years Later

[-] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

Speaking as an Englishman: fuck 'em.

I'm so done with dealing with these antivax idiots that I hope they catch the new variants and suffer.

I do feel sorry for those with compromised immune systems and the kids of antivaxers who also have to suffer because these morons believe the wild conspiracies that it's a weapon for population control that is activated by 5G.

It almost makes me wish the conspiracy was true and these morons were the target leaving the rest of the population alone.

But I guess these loons won't see reason until their grandma or child is gargling on fluids in an understaffed, overcrowded, and collapsing NHS hospital.

[-] Novi@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago

As good as it would feel to support this sentiment, every one of these "antivax idiots" that catches covid gives the virus more generations to mutate. Creating a danger to us all.

[-] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Great, I'll go get my tranquilizer gun and load up some Pfizer, and inoculate the morons as I drive past them standing on the roundabout.

[-] Novi@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

I would not vote guilty on your jury.

[-] ThePyroPython@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Your Honour I was not, as you so derisively put it, "assaulting people with a weapon" and "administering medication without consent".

I was merely "providing an expediant public health service" and frankly for making those three booster shots at 20mph from 15 meters away I deserve a fucking medal!

this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024

209 points (97.7% liked)

World News

39026 readers

1082 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.