27
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Don_Dickle@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml
all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] jewbacca117@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

With enough people and equipment, anything is possible. I'm sure the JDAMs did most of the heavy lifting.

[-] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Once the bombs do the work it isn't unimaginable for some D9s to clear a lot of territory.

[-] philpo@feddit.org 10 points 1 month ago

Not a construction worker but I work with disaster relief and humanitarian aid organisations.

It is not possible if you care for either the inhabitants or your own folks

If you don't it is, plainly said, fairly easy. It happens in basically every conflict.

[-] DarkCloud@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

On YouTube, people like Bisan Owda visit some of these places, you can see what it's like.

[-] 13esq@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

This is an engineering question and engineering questions almost always come down to "do you have enough time and money?"

Since the time scale is two weeks, we only need to know if the Israel had enough resources (bull dozers, wrecking balls, bombs, personnel etc. I don't have that information, but it doesn't sound impossible. If a man can be put on the moon, a city could be bulldozed in two weeks.

[-] Fondots@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

If you have enough people, bulldozers, and money to throw at the problem, sure.

Does Israel have that available? I can't really say.

Some of the things that would factor into how many people, bulldozers, and money you'd need to do so

How big of a city?

What kind of construction are we dealing with?

How much are we willing to ignore worker safety and such?

How much of that city has already been partially demolished by other means the time the bulldozers get there?

How bulldozed does it need to be? There's a spectrum here that goes from something "crashing a bulldozer into every building enough times to make it unlivable" to "everything completely leveled, and all the debris cleaned up, neatly pushed into piles, loaded into trucks, buried, etc." Do we need to bulldoze the entire city? Or just most of it? Or maybe just enough that pretty much every block is looking pretty wrecked? Or maybe just all of the structures and we can leave parks, parking lots, streets, and other open spaces intact?

Do we have to be picky about using specifically bulldozers? If the end result is essentially the same, you could also use excavators, guys with sledgehammers, cranes, wrecking balls, explosives, airstrikes, artillery fire, etc. there's plenty of other options to work into the mix if we don't limit ourselves to just bulldozers.

this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2024
27 points (86.5% liked)

Asklemmy

43890 readers
826 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS