29
all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 9 months ago

No way US pumps more money in Poland than Germany, unless this is counting all the expenses on their base in Poland as "direct investment"

[-] soumerd_retardataire@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 9 months ago

I don't know for the other years, and couldn't easily find data to conclude, but the article writes that :

Intel, a chipmaker, picked Poland for a $4.6bn plant

That'd be 4.6bn out of the ~$7bn on the graph

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 10 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Over 1/3rd of it was to be financed by Polish tax money and it was scrapped anyway.

[-] polskilumalo@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 9 months ago

105 kurwa sasinów poszło się jebać XDDDDDDDDDDDDDD

[-] soumerd_retardataire@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 9 months ago

Well, not necessarily, it's only suspended not canceled :)

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 9 months ago

Going by what happening with Intel right now, i stronly suspect it's only empty talk. Though knowing Polish government and its servilism towards America, i wouldn't be even very surprised if Poland funded 100% of that factory, after all it's exactly what they were doing in 90's

[-] soumerd_retardataire@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I've quickly documented myself on the "polish economic miracle" a few years ago, but only remember that it was linked with millions of polish working in other european countries, as well as important foreign direct investments, you seem knowledgeable so perhaps could you redirect me towards some explanations for this, or take a bit of your time to explain it to me yourself ? I've also postponed the understanding for China's success, this topic of "Why do some countries become wealthy and not others" is among the most interesting possible.
Also, having never heard of Poland(, or any country for that matter,) funding 100% of a company while leaving the dividends to foreign hands, i'd like to know more about that as well if you have the time and/or a link.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Polish "economic miracle" could means several things, we have one constantly reinvented by state propaganda to shut our faces and i lost count long ago what they mean currently. Generally over the last two decades i would say it's blanket term for sucking up the cash from EU (Poland was and still is all the time most subsidized country) while not entirely integrating into EU financial structures to not be hit as hard by the crisises like in 2008 (fun fact: even the fucker balcerowicz knows euro is not good and lobbying hard for keeping currency was probably the only good thing he ever did) and actually quite skillful engineereing of social dumping both from and to Poland.

Before that it was standard for postsocialist country "let's lose 30 years of development, become colonised, and call that economical miracle"

never heard of Poland(, or any country for that matter,) funding 100% of a company while leaving the dividends to foreign hands

Huh? That's happening all the time, it's called "privatisation". In Poland (and i suspect in every postsocialist country) there was especially scummy way to do it in first 3 years of transformation: industry was bought by random people substituted by foreign business, for peanuts, and those peanuts were provided by the company being bought as lease, so effectively it was state just giving up the industry for free, nearly always into foreign hands.

It also did happened later like the case of modern steel mill being build, immediately sold for nearly nothing and of course liquidated as competition (in Silesia around 2005 iirc).

There was also even more blatant case i do known, though it probably also happened way more elswhere and wasn't into foreign hands specifically: Meiji Japan build state industry and then to purposefully kickstart not even capitalism but immediately imperialism, they just given it up to zaibatsus, creating the industrial molochs that would lead Japan straight into fascism. And considering the still-mostly medieval development level of most of coutry it could be said that they literally pushed the imperialism button.

[-] soumerd_retardataire@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Thank you very much, i forgot about privatizations, and initially thought you were talking about brand new industries 100% paid by the state immediately given to foreign hands(, the steel mill factory in Silesia being built in the 70s).
But yeah, it could have brought a lot of money to the state coffers instead of the same foreign capitalist hands. Our public workers have(had) better salaries and working conditions than private ones in France, and it's strangely used as an argument against public enterprises rather than against private enterprises. We're quick to say that these better conditions means higher prices(, but higher salaries means being able to buy at higher prices anyway), yet we'll ignore that higher dividends also mean higher prices, and public enterprises usually have zero dividends as well as fewer salary gaps.

Well, in any case, that was informative, and i didn't know about the gift of japanese state-owned enterprises to the zaibatsus, thanks !

[-] soumerd_retardataire@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I.d.k., but even if it was scrapped it's probably counted in.

I've found this graph here :

This table here may be a good enough answer ?

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 9 months ago

This graph is not related at all, it's from 2021 and it's global investments, look at the y axis. Poland would barely be shown there as pixel. And in the other graphs in your link you can see that US investments in Poland were less than Belgian or Swiss or Swedish, and even by the ultimate flow of capital still half of German ones and less than Netherlands.

[-] soumerd_retardataire@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

This graph is not related at all, it's from 2021 and it's global investments, look at the y axis. Poland would barely be shown there as pixel.
And in the other graphs in your link you can see that US investments in Poland were less than Belgian or Swiss or Swedish

Yep, you're right about the y-axis, i've read that too quickly.
And the other graphs in the pdf seem indeed to confirm that 2023 was an exception :

I should probably research it a bit more to have a more precise point of view.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 9 months ago

that 2023 was an exception

I wonder if this really were all military expenses.

[-] bennieandthez@lemmygrad.ml 5 points 9 months ago

Buvic is definitely a target for being insufferable bothsidesy.

[-] commiewolf@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 9 months ago

"Top Three countries"

What? There are 4 bars? and 6 colors?

What am I looking at?

[-] soumerd_retardataire@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 9 months ago

no clue 🤷, perhaps a mistake ?
The article isn't more informative about this "top three countries"(, and announces a european ban on chinese electric vehicles) : https://archive.ph/69zPS, with the usual race to the bottom :

Rich countries may offer more subsidies, but CEE countries have cheaper land and labour, looser regulations and lower taxes.

[-] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 9 months ago

You do realize that “foreign investment” also includes investments from Russia, correct?

[-] soumerd_retardataire@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I don't understand your point and i don't see a mention of russian foreign investments in the infographic(, probably in the category "Others" ?)

(It's not related to your comment but this post also made me think of investments in Ukraine's economy to incentivize its political alignement change, closer with its past values and those of its south(, if it doesn't end up absorbed in a tri-alliance with Belarus or something else keeping the n.a.t.o. out, who knows), as well as the topic of spheres of influence)

[-] ComradeSalad@lemmygrad.ml 2 points 9 months ago

Because your post implies that a rise in foreign investment is a precursor to regime change and coup attempts. In my original comment I’m telling you that Russia is also counted in the foreign investment number so colour revolution based only off of this data is unlikely.

[-] soumerd_retardataire@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Ah, i'm sorry but i can't wrap my head around why counting(, or not,) Russia in the foreign investments number would change something about this likelihood : if it is absent then China is still enough(, and if it is present then this likelihood would increase). Sorry for my lack of comprehension and feel free not to explain yourself further on this detail if you don't consider it important.

colour revolution based only off of this data is unlikely

While i don't see the link with Russia(, since the p.r.c. is enough in itself), i entirely agree with this quote, it can just be considered as one of the indicators of geopolitical alignment, and i felt interesting to share this ~discovery with Lemmygrad.

this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
29 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2685 readers
49 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS