116
submitted 2 years ago by robocall@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
all 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] kn0wmad1c@programming.dev 60 points 2 years ago

I'm pretty sure nobody loves cheap Chinese goods. It's more people love to be able to afford eating, having a roof over their head, and maybe some shitty, but cheap, headphones.

[-] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 years ago

Hello, fellow citizen! Nice to see you. Are you well? How is the wife/husband/partner/thruple/keyboard today? Ha. Ha. 😶

[-] klemptor@startrek.website 1 points 2 years ago

Yeah and also, sometimes it's really hard to find NMIC products.

[-] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 47 points 2 years ago

I don't love em...I just have no damn choice because greed always wins

[-] b3an@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Many times I’ve wanted products. Could see it comes from Asia and don’t want to risk the quality. It’s flooded online. Difficult to find a true seller and one that isn’t just reselling that same shit I’m avoiding. It’s so irritating.

[-] dan1101@lemm.ee 45 points 2 years ago

Oh no I love my RUXIBTAN earbuds and my HURQIO keyboard.

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 29 points 2 years ago

That particular strain of nonsense is actually specifically an Amazon thing, because you cannot sell "non branded" merchandise on Amazon, a policy that's in place allegedly to combat generic whitebox goods from flooding the site. Your product has to be sold under a registered trademark, but the loophole is that said trademark does not actually have to make any sense whatsoever.

Now there are brokers who will assist anyone in registering a trademark that is literally just a random string of letters for this express purpose. All you have to do is concoct a combination that no one has used yet, and register it with the USPTO.

Therefore the entire scheme falls flat on its face, and manifestly fails to make any impact in the problem it purports to solve. But it does probably give Amazon a legal escape hatch to accusations of being a dumping ground for Chinese knockoff products, because they can point to all those trademark registrations and say, "No, see, everything sold here is all totally from a 100% legitimate brand!"

[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago

1000010136 dyisland brakes

or pigeon whistle at all 1000010135

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago
[-] ravhall@discuss.online 31 points 2 years ago

I wasn’t aware there were alternatives not made in china.

[-] dance_ninja@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

Does this mean fewer duplicate white label items?

[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

If anything it means the duplicate white label items will be harder to spot

[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Fine, we'll get a bidet! TP is just way too expensive now.

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

get it on temu while you still can

[-] otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 years ago

The horror.

[-] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Protectionism in the "land of free market" (irony)

[-] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago

There’s probably a degree of protectionism going on but these platforms sell unsafe products

[-] TheDemonBuer@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

these platforms sell unsafe products

Which is something that can, and often does happen in unregulated free markets. The invisible hand is not necessarily very good at things like consumer protection, among other things.

[-] ilmagico@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

If that was the issue, they'd take steps to ensure safety, ask for certifications, etc. rather than more tariffs and lower "de minimis" exemption. Clearly these decisions are made for economic reasons, not to ensure higher quality products and protect consumers.

[-] devilish666@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

Although chinese goods are famous for crappy short lifespan products but in the end we loved it because no one in this god green earth (except china) can make something cheaper & sell it at ridiculously cheaper....only china can do that thing.

I say this not to mean I am defending them, I hate that many products on the market today seem cheap because they flood the market with very cheap stuff. Yes... even though in the end we as consumers find it difficult to distinguish which goods are premium and which are crap.

We should learn from them, if they can do it, why can't we?

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

"Cracking down" is among the worst newpaper propaganda phrases.

It's meaningless and it implicitly justifies the "cracker".

[-] andrewta@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I’m curious what definition of “cracker” are you using?

this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
116 points (94.6% liked)

News

37227 readers
633 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS