89
I don't think anyone doubted this. Harris/Walz is a pro-politician anti-fascist ticket. I think we're just looking for a sense of normalcy.
Right, it is only in juxtaposition of the Trump Vance ticket that theirs seems so... idk, righteous? Wholesome? But were this 20 years ago, they'd be pretty normal. It's only with the looming threat of another Trump presidency on the backdrop of what he and the GOP have wrought on modern politics that what should just be normal is so hopeful. But I'd love me some fucking normal right now so I'm gonna go ahead and still be excited about that if you all don't mind?
I think the description you're looking for is sane, or at least not pants on head crazy with aspirations to despotism
And JD Vance isn’t really from Appalachia, but Tim Walz doesn’t hang out with Donald Trump, Peter Thiel, and Curtis Yarvin, or degrade women who don’t have kids, and isn’t creepy as fuck, so what’s your point?
Nothing in the article is negative except for a quote from a conservative saying he’s “full of shit”. Got ‘em?
Nothing wrong with being a politician when you've positively contributed in other capacities earlier in life. Career politicians from the start are the problem.
Bernie Sanders tho
There are always exceptions. Unlike most politicians who start their career by networking in college to accumulate potential donors later, Sanders was on the frontline of the civil rights fight.
There are plenty of shitty politicians who started later in life. I would be surprised if the majority of politicians were always career politicians.
Trump for example.
The problem is that few upstanding people enter into national politics in the US, and the system tends to hinder their attempts to be good people.
Wow, from The Atlantic even.
The Atlantic falls into the “both sides” trap and every so often throws out one of these af if they need to prove they aren’t biased. It’s Overton window shifting dumb.
In America you don’t get to vote for a non-politician unless you vote for yourself.
But I wouldn’t do that because I don’t want that shitty job, either.
The Atlantic really flexing their journalism muscle with this one.
Paywall'ed.
Fyi the internet archive has paywall free versions of most Atlantic articles
The person running for office is a politician? Say it isn't so!
I wonder why this article is being released before the election, rather than later when the cooling of support isn't extremely likely to lead to a strategic disadvantage? 🤔 Oh well, it's probably just a coincidence. 🤷♂️ Definitely no ulterior motives here. 👍
Yoda has arrived.
Would you eat a turd or an old sandwhich you found in your bag?
Both are rotten, but one of them is much much worse.
What is that supposed to mean?
I think the meaning is fairly obvious; an imperfect ally is better than an all-out enemy. If you wanna do politics, you need to learn who you can safely ally with, who your actual friends are, and who will always be your enemy.
Edit: oh wow, look at all those comments on ML. I wonder why this person would object to lesser evil rhetoric favoring the democrats.
this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
89 points (73.8% liked)
politics
19144 readers
1836 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS