123
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by jordanlund@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

Final (?) Debate thread before the election in 35 days.

Debate begins at 9 PM Eastern, 6 PM Pacific and runs 90 minutes.

Vice Presidential debates are always tricky since nobody has voted for Vice President in living memory.

Expect Vance to attack Walz on his military service.

Expect Walz to attack Vance on the whole "immigrants eating cats and dogs" thing.

Expect Vance to attack Walz on being an assistant coach, at best.

Expect Walz to roll out "Weird!" at least once.

CBS has announced the burden of fact checking will be on the candidates themselves.

https://apnews.com/article/cbs-debate-vice-president-fact-check-7a3b31c98ab092dd44915df57a359d10

How to watch here:

https://apnews.com/article/cbs-debate-vice-president-fact-check-7a3b31c98ab092dd44915df57a359d10

"How can you watch the VP debate on cable? 

CBS will air debate coverage starting at 8 p.m. ET on CBS broadcast stations and affiliates. Find your local station here.

How can you stream the VP debate without cable? 

The debate can be streamed on the free CBS News app on your connected TV or smartphone, on Paramount+, and all platforms where CBS News 24/7 is available, including CBSNews.com and YouTube. 

Debate coverage on CBS News 24/7 begins at 4 p.m. ET."

Edit Impressive how a debate can go when one participant doesn't have mental health issues! Thanks for coming everybody!

(page 7) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] smokebuddy@lemmy.today 5 points 2 weeks ago

Every article I read speculating on the debate brought up Walz' response to the Minnesota protests but it didn't even come up unless I missed it? I was half expecting JD's closing statement to try and attack Tim on it, also half expecting it to turn into a pitch to sign up for Truth and Rumble

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 5 points 2 weeks ago

I guess I shouldn’t be surprised. Walz gave good answers about 90% of the time but definite dodged a few. Vance, otoh, made shit up constantly and harped on fear topics. Always about the border, blaming Harris for policy she wasn’t responsible for, and offering up an economy that the republicans have zero plans to create.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Dreamless4561@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It's really annoying that JD had a valid point about economic experts being wrong about pushing neoliberalism. That really weakened Walz'es otherwise great point that we should be listening to the experts about climate change and allowed the couchfucker to push the "follow common sense" bullshit.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Vance has only been speaking for a few minutes and it already looks like he has robot hands.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

What the fuck does empowering the border agents mean? They are doing their jobs.

[-] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

lol what “experts” said that? You mean greedy business executives? Pretty sure they aren’t considered experts.

[-] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

There is this face that Vance makes while Walz is talking where he looks at the camera and sort of rolls his eyes.

Idk why but it's kind of funny to me

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Substance_P@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

What is Vance talking about?

[-] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

Ouch on calling other parts of the world dirty

[-] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

And yet you somehow turned out to be a gross little shit

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

That was a weirdly meandering non-answer.

[-] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Walz suddenly appears in the followup.

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

I need Vance’s makeup artist

But seriously , why is he dodging the question?

[-] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

Walz is stumbling early on a bit

[-] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago

Of course once I said that he sounded better lol

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

Does this moron think the VZp is a god in the system? Why didn’t trump do these things when he was president???

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Fuck off. It’s not about wanting families. Your policies turn women into walking coffins!

e: not even one woman anywhere, ever, should have to endure that, if it’s at all preventable. For anyone who doesn’t know, this can easily fall short of all legal exceptions for weeks, because the mother’s life isn’t actually in danger at first – though her sanity is, and it’s inexcusably barbaric.

[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

It's pretty freaking hilarious that Vance is already planning to be in the "spin room" after the debate.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Oct 2024
123 points (96.9% liked)

politics

19043 readers
4031 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS