102
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Are smart phones destroying our mental health?::undefined

all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] theluddite@lemmy.ml 104 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm becoming increasingly skeptical of the "destroying our mental health" framework that we've become obsessed with as a society. "Mental health" is so all-encompassing in its breadth (It's basically our entire subjective experience with the world) but at the same time, it's actually quite limiting in the solutions it implies, as if there's specific ailments or exercises or medications.

We're miserable because our world is bad. The mental health crisis is probably better understood as all of us being sad as we collectively and simultaneously burn the world and fill it with trash, seemingly on purpose, and we're not even having fun. The mental health framework, by converting our anger, loneliness, grief, and sadness into medicalized pathologies, stops us from understanding these feelings as valid and actionable. It leads us to seek clinical or technical fixes, like whether we should limit smart phones or whatever.

Maybe smart phones are bad for our mental health, but I think reducing our entire experience with the world into mental health is the worst thing for our mental health.

[-] FrostyCaveman@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

🥇

Lemmy Gold for this comment

[-] dublet@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Maybe smart phones are bad for our mental health, but I think reducing our entire experience with the world into mental health is the worst thing for our mental health.

In much the same way as individual people are blamed for CO^2^ emissions and make you worry about your carbon footprint as a cynical ploy, it's a type of shifting the blame from where it belongs.

The thought process behind this is: "your personal mental health being bad must be a personal failing rather than external factors, or else the system would need to be changed. And that simply would hurt profits."

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago
[-] Steve@communick.news 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I keep saying it's not the smartphone. It's the social media people are constantly using on their smartphone.

Reading a book all day? Great!
Reading all celebrity gossip, and what your "friends" say they're doing? Not great.

Reading stuff like this all day isn't great.

[-] LukeMedia@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I don't use any other social media except lemmy, and in honestly thinking about replacing it's location on my home screen with something to read that's better for my mind.

[-] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 18 points 1 year ago

Yeah...

I say as I scroll on my smartphone

[-] mintiefresh@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

Weeeellll... They're probably not helping.

[-] starman@programming.dev 12 points 1 year ago

It's just a tool. If there is someone who destroys your mental health it's you or sometimes other people.

[-] Redredme@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Heroin is just a painkiller. A slotmachine is just a game. Guns don't kill people. A cigarette is just a plant leaf in a piece of paper.

While all true, there are clear merits to regulate them.

Are smartphones bad? I don't know. But I wouldn't reject the idea on the spot. I don't think it's the device perse, it's how we use them. There are assholes among us.

[-] alvvayson@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Exactly.

The libertarian paradise of Somalia has never really appealed to me.

As for smartphones, it's no secret that App designers pull every trick they can to increase engagement a.k.a. addiction.

I can definitely see a future where some of the more sinister tricks have mandatory opt-out or opt-in options.

[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

What does "regulate them" look like? It's not phones doing it. It's the social media apps doing it, as far as phones are concerned.

[-] counselwolf@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

it's an awfully convenient and accessible tool though.

[-] 7112@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

It's a tool that opens up a lot of dangers (bullying/misinformation/addiction loops created by companies). Oddly, we don't seem to educate kids on how to handle the tool properly.

[-] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 year ago

Industrialization and capitalism have figured largely in an intergenerational mental health crisis. But it's so ubiquitous we think dysfunctional behavior is normal and accepable like vodka addiction in Russia.

Social media and dysfunctional smartphone behavior is yet another cope, yet another way to tolerate a stressful live forced upon us. And it's probably less harmful than other coping methods such as drinking or domestic violence.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So giving phones to kids and not parenting them enough to ensure they learn how to interact with people IRL is bad?

I thought we had kinda already come to that conclusion some years ago tbh

(Not your fault OP) Clickbaity headline

[-] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately it is very difficult to be good parents when both parents have to stay out over 10 hrs per day to work. This is the part that is always overlooked in these news. Problem is not the smartphones. It's modern society

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Really good point tbh, and really just adds to my point, not just bad parenting through negligence, but also an unfortunate lack of presence from otherwise good parents even being possible due to both needing full time jobs.

I'm not gonna bang the 4dww drum in this thread, but reduced-day-same-pay working weeks need to happen yesterday, so many tangible improvements to society are just hanging there.

[-] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Absolutely agree. We should have gone from single income households to "2 part time incomes" households

[-] lemann@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago
[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Oh lol, well, I guess strictly not the bot's fault either

Though I guess probably also not necessary to reassure the bot.

^(Remember this in the AI uprising)

[-] unreachable@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago
[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Eh. Wasn't much there to destroy anyways. At least i got memes and cat pics out of the deal.

[-] rikonium@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago

Sometimes I dream of a flip phone or regressing to using a Treo but the core services like Facetime, etc. are quite handy. I’m thinking when I get much older it’ll be easier. Still got a Palm PDA that runs on AAA’s sitting in a box waiting… but of course the year 2038(?) problem is a thing and there’s a capacitor I’ll have to replace on the board eventually. But syncing things locally sounds neat since I’m back down to one phone and one computer now.

this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
102 points (88.1% liked)

Technology

59559 readers
2238 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS