Sounds like BC is adopting the alternative facts standard when reporting COVID.

Never thought I'd hear crap like that coming from an NDP gov't.

More along that point, does a hospital admin who shirks basic human responsibility to report an outbreak to prevent negative media attention deserve

• unemployment,
• criminal sanctions,
• public shaming, or
• all three ?

This is the best summary I could come up with:

An email from an Island Health medical director seen by CBC said they did not declare an outbreak at Saanich Peninsula Hospital — where the majority of patients are elderly and therefore more vulnerable to the virus — despite known spread due to "negative connotations to the public ... media attention, possible patient shunting to [other local hospital] beds, and closing of all admissions to the affected units."

Even without including sites with enhanced measures, the BC Centre for Disease Control's latest report shows a spike in COVID-19 outbreaks at acute care facilities as of Aug. 27 compared to the summer, though numbers are much lower than August of last year.

"COVID-19 affects people in often profound and lasting ways, and we have to respond with a program of vaccination and encourage everyone to be involved," Dix said.

Neither the health minister nor the ministry would comment on whether they plan to reinstate a mask mandate for health-care workers in response to rising hospitalizations.

"If there is an uptick in transmissions at St. Paul's or other healthcare facilities, policies should reflect that and possibly the mandates need to come back."

Tam's office shared several recommendations to reduce the spread of respiratory viruses on X, formerly known as Twitter, including staying home when sick, wearing a mask in indoor public settings, and improving ventilation by opening a door or window.

The original article contains 976 words, the summary contains 229 words. Saved 77%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!