374
top 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] MudMan@fedia.io 159 points 1 month ago

“You want us to litigate things that happened four years ago when we’re talking about the future."

See, this would ring a lot more true if the issue wasn't being literally litigated right now and going forward. As in, somebody just got sent to jail. Court documents about Trump's outstanding criminal trial just got released.

Yeah, people want you to litigate stuff that happened four years ago. And then for those responsible, Trump included, to go to jail for... you know, all the crimes. "I want to talk about the future" doesn't play quite as well when the judge is asking you about those.

[-] Nougat@fedia.io 61 points 1 month ago

And it would have been litigated already, at least a year ago, except for the GOP fuckery aiding the defense in their delay tactics.

[-] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Oof. Well, pro tip for him - EVERYTHING ever litigated is for something that happened in the past. That’s how it works!

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 109 points 1 month ago

We already know they're all complacent its why they are still there. The entire GOP.is dead. Its the Trump Party now.

[-] Vorticity@lemmy.world 58 points 1 month ago

I think you mean "complicit" rather than "complacent", though both could be true I suppose.

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

I did but honestly they are both complicit in insurrection, and complacent in their duties to their constituency.

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 20 points 1 month ago

It’s the Putin party.

It’s a “gotcha question” because it shows exactly who is taking Rubles for payment.

[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 87 points 1 month ago

Reality itself is a gotcha for these fools.

[-] SoupBrick@yiffit.net 52 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[-] LovingHippieCat@lemmy.world 71 points 1 month ago

"Listen, we're not gonna play this game. We are focused on the future. Now, let us show you a future where we cheat just like we wanted and tried to in 2020."

[-] KingGordon@lemmy.world 23 points 1 month ago

I am focused on the future. Project 2025 occurs in the future.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 62 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It kind of is: for THEM!

"Its devastating to my case" is only chickens coming home to roost

[-] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago

it’s only a “gotcha” question because you insist on lying. why is it so hard for you to say “trump lost”?

[-] takeda@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

He knows trump is petty, so if he would say that on Monday he would no longer be a speaker.

Same with Vance being a VP.

It's mind blowing how much control that one person has over the entire party.

[-] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

Even more mind blowing is that an incoherent, rambling, oblivious fraudster has that much control over the party.

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 month ago

it's a cult pretending to be a party. parties don't demonize and make enemies of people who leave the party. cults do

[-] Limonene@lemmy.world 45 points 1 month ago

We’re not gonna talk about what happened in 2020, we’re gonna talk about 2024

When asking a Republican "Who won the 2020 election", that is a question entirely about 2024. A Republican's answer (or non-answer) can be used to predict how they will behave after losing the 2024 election.

[-] AlbinoPython@lemmy.world 27 points 1 month ago

Only if you're a traitorous piece of shit

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 23 points 1 month ago

Gotcha maga-ing.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

That’s a damning non-answer

[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago

If you say that having traitors in government is bad and one party gets infuriated by it, I think you've mapped your problem.

The prior manager for McDonald's was fired but then lied to everyone about it and when the new manager was going to arrive, tried to burn down the building. He was kicked out.

Four years later he's applying for manager of the same McDonald's. Maybe we should, you know, consider the whole "burn down the building" thing?

Oh wait, sorry, this is for President, totally different standards.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

We’re not gonna talk about what happened in 2020, we’re gonna talk about 2024 and how we’re gonna solve the problems for the American people.

Judge: did you rob that bank?

Defendant: I. Not going to talk about the past, it's irrelevant, I'm here to talk about how I will be a free citizen in the future!

Totally works

[-] billwashere@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

The answer should be “Biden. Next question”

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Another putin cocksmoker. All repubs in congress and on the SC are fucking worthless traitor filth.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

There's real gotchas and there's fake gotchas. This one is real. So they want to play it off as a fake one.

[-] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Only a gotcha if you're a amoral crap stain of a American.

[-] toiletobserver@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago
[-] thenextguy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago
[-] BenLeMan@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

We got him, boys!

[-] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world -4 points 1 month ago

Huffington Post - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Huffington Post:

MBFC: Left - Credibility: Medium - Factual Reporting: Mixed - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.huffpost.com/entry/mike-johnson-who-won-2020-election-gotcha-question_n_6702b3e6e4b0c8e79502d408
Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2024
374 points (99.0% liked)

politics

19096 readers
1882 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS