951
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FoundTheVegan@kbin.social 243 points 1 year ago

“cannot use her own constitutional rights as a shield to violate the constitutional rights of others while performing her duties as an elected official”.

"It's my right to deny your rights."

Remeber these are the people shouting about religious freedoms.

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 153 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is something that needs to shouted loud and clear.

The Constitution protects citizens from the government. If you work for the government, you are what the Constitution protects us from. If you do not understand that, you do not need to be getting a paycheck drawn from taxpayers.

[-] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 69 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They literally believe the very existence of gay married couples is an assault on their religious freedom. The unchecked "religious freedom" they want logically would include bigamy and pedophilia, but better not talk about that.

Evangelicals and conservatives want to be protected by American laws but not bound by them, while everyone else is tightly bound by laws, but not protected by them.

[-] lobut@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 year ago

Rob Corddry did a Daily Show interview way back about the pharmacist and birth control (the abortion pill). The pharmacist kept saying about his right were being violated when the courts said he had to go against his beliefs. Rob sarcastically says (I'm paraphrasing), "yeah, how can they push their beliefs on you! that's your job to do the customer!"

[-] dustyData@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

For conservatives “religious freedom” means their freedom to impose their religion on you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] galaxies_collide@lemmy.world 136 points 1 year ago

She’ll just get crowdfunding money from Republicans (white domestic terrorists).

[-] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 118 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean, either way it's a win. If she gets $2 each from a shitload of right wing fuckheads, that means we made ~50,000 right wing fuckheads pay to support gay marriage.

[-] NewNewAccount@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

That’s 50,000 people paying for the attempt at preventing gay marriage, not in support of it.

[-] AFaithfulNihilist@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Paying for a failed attempt. So it's kind of impotence squared if it happens.

That's $100,000 that won't get to those people unless somebody else raises it because I doubt very seriously Kim Davis has $100,000.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] ForestOrca@kbin.social 34 points 1 year ago

I don't care where she gets the money, as I'm delighted where the money is going.

[-] mustardman@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Finally. We have the funds to enact the Gay Agenda©

Execute order 69.

That's fine, victims get their money and some dumb cunt in Ohio is a little bit poorer. Sounds like a win-win to me.

[-] asdfasdfasdf@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Sounds like socialism to me

[-] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I get the joke but to be clear, handouts are not a problem for these folks, so long as the Jesus Strings are fully attached.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago

Everyone has the right to follow their religion. If Big Kim didn't want to disobey her God, she is allowed to: by resigning her position in protest and joining a monastery.

[-] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 year ago

I believe "Get thee to a nunnery." might be appropriate.

[-] SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml 43 points 1 year ago

Good, fuck her, cunt.

On another topic, while I'm straight, if I were gay, I don't think I'm prepared to date, let alone marry, someone with the same first name as me. Being gay is perfectly normal, marrying someone with the same first name as you isn't. No judgement though, just don't think I'm cut out for it.

[-] Nutteman@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago
[-] Lilnino@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

SAY OUR NAME, SAY OUR NAME!

[-] TheYear2525@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

New head-cannon for the Bobs in office space.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Drewdp@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago

So judge David B ruled Kim Davis had to pay David E and David M 50k each. .

I was not aware there were so many Dave's involved.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

These are the Daves that I know I know, these are the Daves I know. Some of them go by David but most of them just go by Dave. They all have different hands but come from different moms

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Eight year legal battle and a payout you'll never see. Seems fair.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Rooty@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago

I've said it before, if your religion is preventing you form doing your job, either change you religion or change your job.

[-] KillAllPoorPeople@lemmy.world 29 points 1 year ago

She's going to start a GoFundMe and get like $500k and walk away wealthy. I hate how fucked up our society is.

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] natecox@programming.dev 25 points 1 year ago

I don’t understand why one couple got $100,000, while the other couple got nothing. I wish the article had expanded on that a bit more.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Thoughts and prayers.

[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz 21 points 1 year ago

Be a joke; go broke

[-] esadatari@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

aaaaahahahahahahaha that bitch can get fucked for all hundred k of it.

[-] Anonymousllama@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Finally some good news. Still amazed it's taken this long to get a resolution

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 year ago

US district judge David Bunning said that Davis “cannot use her own constitutional rights as a shield to violate the constitutional rights of others while performing her duties as an elected official”.

[…]

During this week’s trial, Davis argued that she was protected from litigation due to qualified immunity, a doctrine that protects government officials from lawsuits accusing them of violating someone’s constitutional rights.

"I shouldn't have to do this thing because of my beliefs."

"I shouldn't be guilty because I was acting on behalf of the government."

Pretty big valley between these two arguments. Roast this fucking turd.

"Good Christian" Adulterer Kim Davis conceived twins with her lover while married to another man.

“If a man commits adultery with another man’s wife—with the wife of his neighbor—both the adulterer and the adulteress are to be put to death” (Leviticus 20:10)

Yet another example of an evangelical conservative expecting to be protected by laws but not bound by them, while everyone else is to be bound by laws but not protected by them.

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 12 points 1 year ago

For abusing authority she doesn't have. Save up Kim,

[-] finthechat@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

Sucks to suck

[-] n0m4n@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Davis went far out of her way to screw over some people. Bigotry has costs.

[-] user91@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

No way this red has that money

[-] DoctorTYVM@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Uplifting news!

[-] sadreality@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

FAFO

I guess no immunity for her?

Should been police!

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

You're looking at it the wrong way. This is like a cop seeking QI for letting an escaped convict go. Doing the opposite of their "job".

[-] LeadSoldier@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Border patrol agent Manual Alvarez IV got qualified immunity for assaulting me while I was in handcuffs between being booked and being interrogated. That certainly wasn't part of his job.

Also, I was found not guilty because you are allowed to protest the separation and detention of children at the border. So it wasn't part of his job to arrest me either.

Qualified immunity. Now that racist, fuck is just in a different part of border patrol training and leading the other agents. This is how poison spreads. This is why all cops are bastards. You either pluck these people out of the system immediately or accept that you have corrupted a system.

[-] ickplant@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Bet he got a pat on his back from his buddies for this. Fucking pigs.

[-] thefartographer@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

But how are we gonna remain as American as apple pie if we keep getting rid of all our apples?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] meldroc@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

GAAAAH!!! MY EYES!!! I'd forgotten how ugly that woman is, inside and out!

Does she still wear her homemade birth control dresses?

[-] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 4 points 1 year ago

She might have to sell one of her Trump-rally powerboats or something

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2023
951 points (97.3% liked)

News

23388 readers
1440 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS