35
submitted 1 month ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/technology@hexbear.net
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] mustGo@hexbear.net 21 points 1 month ago

"Everyone can learn to code you just need to know ~~English~~ Chinese"
— updated techbro proverb

[-] SadArtemis@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago

Fingers crossed. The scourge of *nglish can be defeated yet!

[-] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 17 points 1 month ago

Better China than Zuckerberg and Musk

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 11 points 1 month ago

I'm not even going to bother to read an Econmist article, I'd wager there's some brainworms in there

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

my fav bit was when they complain how capitalist markets can't compete with central planning 🎻

In the process, the West has been abandoning its commitment to a bottom-up, market-based approach to setting technical standards. “We are being forced to undermine a system that has been very effective and that we have profited from for a long time,” laments Mr Rühlig. In more ways than one, China is making the West play by its rules.

[-] Tomorrow_Farewell@hexbear.net 10 points 1 month ago

If your system is so effective, then why is it unable to compete?

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 month ago

hey, it's effective at lining the pockets of the oligarchs :)

[-] miz@hexbear.net 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

In the 1860s, The Economist stood nearly alone among liberal opinion in Britain in supporting the Confederacy against the Union, all in the name of access to cheap Southern “Blood Cotton” [...] and fear of higher tariffs if the North triumphed. “The Economist was unusual,” writes an historian of English public opinion at the time; “Other journals still regarded slavery as a greater evil than restrictive trade practices.”

‘The Economist’ Has a Slavery Problem | The Nation

Here, then, is the problem with the magazine: readers are consistently given the impression, regardless of whether it is true, that unrestricted free market capitalism is a Thoroughly Good Thing, and that sensible and pragmatic British intellectuals have vouched for this position. The nuances are erased, reality is fudged, and The Economist helps its American readers pretend to have read books by telling them things that the books don’t actually say.

How The Economist Thinks | Current Affairs

this post was submitted on 13 Oct 2024
35 points (100.0% liked)

technology

23307 readers
275 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS