143
submitted 9 months ago by TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml to c/movies@lemm.ee
top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Lussy@hexbear.net 30 points 9 months ago

The more I think about the Jonkler 2 the more I realize just how good it was. People say it’s done as a reaction to the first film, that it tries to back away from the type of people who related it to it. If anything, I thought it doubled down on its messaging, only that it actually spelled it out in this movie.

This movie is bleak, one of the most depressing films I’ve seen maybe ever, and it truly had a lasting, saddening effect on me. While the first was entertaining in its escapism, this one is relentless in pushing the idea of pure despair. Over and over again it tries to reminds you there is no virtue to mentall illness, there is no glamour, and there is zero hope for anything better for anyone afflicted with it in this country. It feels like whiplash to people, as if it’s completely disjointed from the first but damn, I think it makes duology a masterpiece.

The saddest thing is that the first had to make like a billion dollars, under the guise of cape shit, for this one to be made.

[-] z3rOR0ne@lemmy.ml 9 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I recently listened to a review of the film on the Pod Damn America podcast which expressed somewhat similar sentiments.

I was surprised by the generally poor reviews coming out after hearing this review which praised it for portraying a more sober and somber depiction of mental illness than what audiences had expected.

I have yet to see either the original or this sequel, but I'll admit the more favorable reviews of this sequel make me want to set aside a few hours to give them some attention.

[-] Pringles@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago

I think both movies are worth it. The second one appears to have less mass appeal, but I thought it was a great movie. I think in time this movie will be rehabilitated by the general public and you'll have people who are bashing it now saying they always liked it.

[-] flicker@lemmy.world 26 points 9 months ago

You can make more money with a flop than with a hit!

[-] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

I get this reference

[-] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 23 points 9 months ago

Imagine making 20 millions as a director to lose 200

[-] imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works 30 points 9 months ago

Meh the director already got paid. Producers are taking the monetary hit on this one. Probably won't be a good sign for the director's career moving forward though.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 9 points 9 months ago

I'm sure he'll survive, somehow.

[-] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 7 points 9 months ago

Yes, the director definitely got his salary, but the money is still going to be lost by the studio

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 12 points 9 months ago

Fuck it, I’d do it for $2 mil.

[-] CitizenKong@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

I mean he also made the first one that made a billion.

[-] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 1 points 9 months ago
[-] Orbituary@lemmy.world 21 points 9 months ago

I liked the movie a lot.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

Yeah it would have worked if they waited another 5 years before trying to beat the horse for nostalgia value. They were impatient.

People saw the first film as a novel concept with a new exciting take on a classic character. People are going to see the sequel as something... not fresh.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Exciting is not a word I would use to describe the Joker movie.

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

From stairs dancing to shooting talk show hosts, I think a lot of people would disagree with you.

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 2 points 9 months ago

The penguin origin story is another shoe-in I feel. I don't see it mentioned often. Is it decent it drab?

[-] TachyonTele@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

No, the Penguin is actually really good.

[-] Akasazh@feddit.nl 2 points 9 months ago

I see, thnx!

[-] keyez@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

In an interview Todd Philips said he and Joaquin had no plans for a second movie until Joaquin had a dream about doing a second movie

[-] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Maybe dreams should actually remain memes.

[-] JizzmasterD@lemmy.ca 15 points 9 months ago

It was actually not bad. It stumbled on the ending but did a lot of things well for the DC universe’s « La La Land. »

[-] doggle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 9 months ago

Didn't even know this movie had been announced until I'd heard it was bombing. I never watched the first one so odds were pretty slim I'd have seen it anyway.

[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

I haven’t seen it but was looking forward to it until I heard it’s a musical. Just why

[-] Mongostein@lemmy.ca 10 points 9 months ago

Apparently the director didn’t want to do a sequel so he came up with a bad idea that he thought the studio would never go for, but they did.

[-] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 months ago

I have heard this too, but I think it could also be that the director kinda got lucky with the first movie. I enjoyed the first movie, but it didn’t really feel original, it just seemed to borrow ideas from other movies and those ideas just worked cohesively enough. None of Todd Phillips other movies feel that original either.

[-] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 3 points 9 months ago

Hey, completely unrelated, but based on your username you might like !dragonball@ani.social

[-] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 2 points 9 months ago

Thank you, and subscribed

[-] RidderSport@feddit.org 9 points 9 months ago

I did watch it, although I had been warned. I figured the calls of it being a musical had to be inflated - they weren't. If you cut the singing, you'll have about half the runtime.

That in and of itself isn't even bad, albeit not my cup of tea. However what really annoyed me, was that NOTHING happened. It was basically a slice of psychic ward life story. One with an explosive but blue-balled ending. It was basically just the script writers trying to make Lady Gaga sing a lot - well a job well done I suppose.

It actually annoys me a lot, because the cast was great and delivered exceptionally well in their acting. The premise and setting also had a lot of potential, but what we got was more of an art-house low-budget movie with great actors but terrible script

[-] smeenz@lemmy.nz 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

A psychic ward? Now that would make for an interesting story. Joker can now see into the future.

[-] rothaine@beehaw.org 6 points 9 months ago

roughly $100 million to market and distribute.

And yet this is the first time I'm hearing that it's out

[-] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 8 points 9 months ago

It's because you use uBlock Origin and don't subscribe to cable.

Plus, you're on the Fediverse, where there are even less opportunities for advertising than centralized social media.

[-] Blaze@sopuli.xyz 4 points 9 months ago

It's still regularly discussed on this community

[-] TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml 4 points 9 months ago

True. Maybe @rothaine@beehaw.org isn't a regular member of this community.

[-] GammaGames@beehaw.org 5 points 9 months ago

I just don’t understand. The first was a novelty that did surprisingly well, I had no expectation that this would be anywhere as successful. Who’s making these estimates?

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 1 points 9 months ago

I don't think a Joker movie is really much of a novelty? Just a superhero film that looks at an origin story for the most popular comic villain of all time.

[-] GammaGames@beehaw.org 4 points 9 months ago

Compared to most movies… it was weird. I enjoyed my time with it but didn’t care what happened after the credits rolled. I don’t know anyone that was looking forward to this, most didn’t even know about it.

At least the first one had the stairs meme!

[-] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 2 points 9 months ago

I loved the first one. The second one I immediately did not care about the moment I heard that it was a musical. At first I thought they were joking.

[-] GammaGames@beehaw.org 2 points 9 months ago

Don’t get me wrong, the first was a good movie! It was also what I expected going in: a slow character piece about some guy turning into a crazy Batman villain.

I didn’t know the sequel was a musical, what an odd decision!

[-] HeartyOfGlass@lemm.ee 4 points 9 months ago

That's okay. In a year or two they'll call it a "cult classic" and make another anyway.

[-] AlexisFR@jlai.lu 3 points 9 months ago

No, they won't. It'll never be a cult classic.

this post was submitted on 14 Oct 2024
143 points (99.3% liked)

[moved to piefed] movies

4272 readers
1 users here now

Matrix room: https://matrix.to/#/#fediversefilms:matrix.org

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS