129
(page 2) 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Zvyozdochka@hexbear.net 17 points 8 hours ago

Another contender for top tech innovation

[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 11 points 8 hours ago

That at least has some conceivable benefit? Having a chatbot return memory allocation sizes is comically insecure and dumb

[-] Zvyozdochka@hexbear.net 11 points 8 hours ago

Oh yea, they're definitely not on the same level, it's just some bazinga brained image I had laying around and I thought it was somewhat fitting.

[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 9 points 8 hours ago

I might need reeducation because I think that image is probably the closest thing to an appropriate usecase for LLMs I've seen ever.

[-] Zvyozdochka@hexbear.net 8 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I don't think the idea of it is terrible, I can see it's use cases, but I think it being implemented in MySQL directly is extremely silly. Imagine having to have all the instances of your database server running on some beefy hardware to handle the prompts, just do the actual processing on a separate machine with the appropriate hardware then shove it into the database with another query when it's done.

[-] alexandra_kollontai@hexbear.net 4 points 7 hours ago

Probably useful in data science

[-] invalidusernamelol@hexbear.net 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

It's nice to be able to do something like this without having to use an ORM. Especially if you need a version of the data that's limited to a certain character size.

Like having a replica on the edge that serves the 100 character summaries then only loads the full 1000+ character record when a user interacts with it.

A summary of the review is also more useful than just the first 100 characters of a review.

If the model that's used for that is moderately light I could see it actually using less energy over time for high volume applications if it is able to lower overall bandwidth.

This is all assuming that the model is only run one time or on record update though and not every time the query is run...

[-] citrussy_capybara@hexbear.net 12 points 8 hours ago
[-] GVAGUY3@hexbear.net 19 points 9 hours ago

I do Quality Engineering. This makes me shutter with fear even though I'm not the one coding.

[-] hexaflexagonbear@hexbear.net 18 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)
[-] hypercracker@hexbear.net 13 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

okay now I've always wondered what the actual context for this clip is. like I can't imagine anything in a period piece gangster show that would lead to this scene

[-] peeonyou@hexbear.net 15 points 8 hours ago

communism did this to him

[-] Abracadaniel@hexbear.net 11 points 8 hours ago

watch his legs & it's like he quickly levitates toward the camera

[-] Parzivus@hexbear.net 18 points 9 hours ago

I switched degrees out of CS because of shit like this. The final straw was having to write code with pencil and paper on exams. I'm probably happier than I would've been making six figures at some bullshit IT job (biaoqing-copium)

[-] TheSpectreOfGay@hexbear.net 20 points 9 hours ago

if it makes u feel better i graduated out of CS and can't find a job bc the field is so oversaturated

[-] GVAGUY3@hexbear.net 16 points 9 hours ago

I had to do that once. That was pre ChatGPT tho so I can imagine it's worse because the rampant cheating.

[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 10 points 8 hours ago

I had to do it too (before and after LLM era) but it's not really necessary ever. If they want us not to use ChatGPT they can make us take exams in a computer lab with supervision. For some reason, one or two profs refuse to do that and still hand out exams on paper where you gotta write entire scripts. Deeply unserious field.

[-] Parzivus@hexbear.net 8 points 8 hours ago

I was pre ChatGPT also. Still do writing for my current job but I'm too much of a boomer to trust it with anything.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] radio_free_asgarthr@hexbear.net 17 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Did the C 2024 standard include a specific ChatGPT specification? Seems like an easy opening for unspecified behavior.

[-] Abracadaniel@hexbear.net 14 points 9 hours ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] QuillcrestFalconer@hexbear.net 11 points 9 hours ago

Lmao what's the source

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
129 points (100.0% liked)

technology

23238 readers
239 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS