65
submitted 1 day ago by alessandro@lemmy.ca to c/pcgaming@lemmy.ca
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] antaymonkey@lemmy.world 38 points 1 day ago

Hasn't SQ42 already had multiple release date announcements? This is a joke, right?

[-] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 day ago

It was originally supposed to come out in about 2016 I think.

[-] Fades@lemmy.world 1 points 8 minutes ago* (last edited 7 minutes ago)

They said it was nearly complete in 2016, so that makes sense to be honest. I don’t know why everyone is bitching about this.

Surely nearly every other game in existence has also required ten years of polishing after development is finished!!

[-] Tattorack@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago

Yes, but this time they recently showed off a whole hour of gameplay from the start of SQ42... Which mostly consisted of cutscenes.

[-] momocchi@lemmy.world 45 points 1 day ago

Yeah because Chris Roberts is so well known for reliable release dates

[-] felykiosa@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 day ago

They played it live wasn't perfect but a 2026 release is completely plausible

[-] wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 1 day ago

Man, you young folks must not have been around for E3, or all the various leaked E3 presentation builds of games over the years.

You can pull off some amazing looking stuff with just scripting the hell out of everything and only showing what you want people to see. Toss in some obviously unfinished stuff to make it all look more legit.

Gameplay "demos" that are not open to the public to mess with are just ad reel by another name.

[-] momocchi@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago

I’m sure its plausible, but I just have no faith left in them to stick to a date so would not be at all surprised to see it slip

[-] Comment105@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Genuinely though, they're right I'm surprised it's not a 2025 release date.

2026 is plenty of time to finish an animation-heavy linear "CoD/Battlefield in space" campaign that is supposed to be feature complete and playable already.

Squadron 42 is nothing like Star Citizen. It's about as impressive as a 2004 Morrowind-lookalike single-player Elwynn Forest to Deadmines to Onyxia campaign with a preset character running around in a modified World of Warcraft engine, while the devs are struggling and failing to make 40 player raids and Alterac Valley possible.

I'm not particularly interested in Chris Robert's toy space opera, using SC's fantastic assets to make a silly Top Gun space parody while SC fails to realize its actually interesting goals, like large scale combined arms "star wars" warfare in a completely open space and planetside theater where boarding capital ships is possible.

I don't see them stabilizing SC ever, it seems like it'll never be playable by anyone without an incredible patience for bullshit and faff. I'm just $90 deep but I'll be very happy if I'm wrong and my Arrow gets to see their grandiose galaxy.

But SQ42? Sure. 2026 makes sense.

[-] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 7 points 1 day ago

I heard the same bullshit about a 2016 release of SC. It's nothing but copium. It's laughably easy to show "gameplay" of a prepared show demo, even if nothing of the actual game actually existed. Roberts has done this so many times already.

[-] fulg@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

I look forward to the delay announcement in two years.

[-] joelfromaus@aussie.zone 15 points 1 day ago

I still have my pledge to SC, ~$25 so not a big one, but I’ve all but lost hope on a release of the full scope of the game as it was set out years ago thanks to the massive amount of feature creep and mismanagement.

[-] rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 day ago

I hop in every so often, fly my Cutlass around, blow some shit up, check out the ground game and then go back to Elite. I got my money's worth. Still need to check out 3.24

[-] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago

Yeah I'm similar, I'm in for about $45 or so from the Kickstarter. I wrote it off and stopped paying attention about 6-7 years ago (it was already pretty far behind then!) but I figure, I've wasted more money on dumber stuff before, and if an actual game ever does happen to materialise then I'll give it a look.

I've also got the cheapest possible pledge. Played the game with friends a bunch, was a lot of fun when it worked.

Honestly, I feel like I got my money's worth. If it comes out, nice, if it doesn't, oh well.

[-] Artyom@lemm.ee 9 points 1 day ago

If you want to play a space flight combat game, Everspace 1 and 2 have both come out in less time than Star Citizen, and I'd bet my life Everspace 3 will also be out before Star Citizen.

[-] QuadratureSurfer@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I think you meant Squadron 42.

Star Citizen is an MMO while Everspace and Squadron 42 are single player games.

[-] warbond@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Is there a Lemmy community for people who don't just shit on the game? Tired of just hearing about how it's a scam. Does anybody play this and enjoy it?

[-] Schmuppes@lemmy.today 3 points 17 hours ago

You mean something like r/LowSodiumCyberpunk?

[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 2 points 18 hours ago

There was a big convention recently where they dropped details and a demo.

AI media enjoyers are looking to get your clicks!

[-] Retrograde@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I play it and enjoy it. Haven't spent more than $45 and have put in hundreds of hours with friends.

There is a Lemmy SC community but it's pretty dead unfortunately

[-] warbond@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

I think being on Lemmy is part of the issue. The Venn diagram of people who left Reddit for Lemmy and the people who support pie in the sky games like SC doesn't have a whole lot of overlap in the middle, I wouldn't think.

Anyway, any particular gameplay loop you're excited for?

[-] Retrograde@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Too true about the venn diagram. If SC was on Linux, I bet the Lemmy community would be thriving lol.

As for what I'm excited for, honestly just new star systems. I'm getting really tired of the original Stanton system as I've done and seen pretty much everything it has. The new system Pyro is apparently supposed to release before the end of the year so that would be really cool to see.

In the meantime we've been doing illegal bounty missions which has you destroying law abiding NPC ships and pirating their loot- it's pretty fun and you can make a fortune doing it :)

[-] Fades@lemmy.world 1 points 4 minutes ago

Yes, because the problem is the OS it runs on and not that the devs can do nothing but lie.

Squadron 42 was nearly complete and needed polish in 2023 and now we learn a year later it’s delayed till 2026.

Just like the game itself started production in 2011 and has since missed date after date after date and produced an expensive and constantly broken tech demo mess.

But yeah if only it were on Linux and has nothing to do with the misuse of funds and said broken promises

[-] DerisionConsulting@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

You can always make one if there isn't, but you will likely need to heavily moderate it.

[-] warbond@lemmy.world 0 points 12 hours ago

I thought of that, but I don't think I'm the best fit for that kind of time investment.

this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
65 points (92.2% liked)

PC Gaming

8420 readers
232 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS