Although there is a common adjective order, it's not always clear which category a word belongs in. People insisting that the words "modular" and "versatile" fit into whatever category they chose are presenting a lot more certainty than is warranted. I am a native speaker, and either order sounds fine in this case.
To my ears, when I say them out loud, I have to pause after versatile, but not after modular. This makes versatile and modular flow worse than modular and versatile does.
This also went away after a few repetitions, so it likely doesn't matter all that much.
Neither sounds "wrong" to my ear, but if I had to pick one, hmmmm...I think modular things are inherently versatile, but versatile things aren't inherently modular, so I would go with "versatile and modular" so it gets more specific from first word to second word.
Or consider not using both those words.
Edit: the order of adjectives usually matters when they are different types of adjectives, like "five big brown bears". You have a number, a size, and a color. That one sounds wrong if you get them out of order. But modular and versatile are the same kind of adjective, so I don't think there's really a wrong choice here.
I tend to agree with you. Plus, with this particular thing, it's possible to build it to be modular and not versatile, or the other way around. Or neither, which we're using now.
The latter is correct.
English has a fixed adjective order:
Determiner
Quantity
Opinion
Size
Age
Shape
Color
Origin/Material
Qualifier
"Versatile" is an opinion and "modular" is a qualifier.
"The single, versatile, large, new, round, blue, local, modular thingamawidget."
I agree that "versatile, modular" is the right order. But is that order also preferred if the conjunction "and" is used to separate the adjectives? I thought the rule was particular to the peculiar way we can string together adjectives with no conjunction.
"Modular, versatile" sounds wrong, but "modular and versatile" less so.
I'm not sure on the rules/general use but my ear agrees with this. As soon as you put an "and" between them nearly any order seems totally normal.
"I present to you the next generation of thingamawidgets. The future of thingamawidging: The SVeLNeRBLoMT^tm^ "
I can sort out the blue aspect through cheap spray paint, but I need to do some research on making a 19" rack round...
Putting the shortest word first sounds better.
'Men and women' is the usual order, as is 'ladies and gentlemen.'
I'd go with modular first. imho
To my ear, modular and versatile are so similar that I wouldn't connect them with "and". It's almost redundant, like "grey and colorless".
Also, "versatile" without any more context is devoid of meaning.
Hard to say without more info, but my instinct is, it would sound nicer to pitch a "modular thingamawidget" and explain its versatility in another sentence or a subordinate clause.
There's a lot of context that I cannot share without making it a two week course in what I do for a living, but to put it simply, both versatility and modularity are descriptors that make sense together for the intended audience, as the system can be one without the other. Plus versatile refers to the software, and modular refers to the hardware.
In that case, I think the whole question is moot. The umbrella term of thingamawidget is not both modular and versatile, but its constituent parts are individually. "The thingamawidget with versatile software and modular hardware is…" would then be the more accurate description.
Otherwise it's like describing a brownie as wet and bitter because the egg is wet and the raw cocoa is bitter.
I would say modular and versatile. Other one sounds off, but not in a critical way.
adjective order (first to last):
'versatile' is an opinion. it would go before 'modular'
Why do you consider “versatile” an opinion? It’s a genuine question, I’m a native speaker and wouldn’t have thought that, but I’m also unfamiliar with how this is typically taught.
Heh, that made me realize that the trademark of the system we're currently using, which is abbreviated into four letters, should have the first three in the opposite order.
It's not uncommon to change the order for branding. It makes people notice it more -- even though they're noticing it because it "feels" incorrect, it tends to force a reader's attention. Alternatively, it might be a non-english company.
What system? Lemmy? ActivityPub? Neither are 4 letter acronyms
Neither. By "we" I mean my colleagues and I at work. It's a proprietary thing we use. I cannot share the name as it's too easily googleable and doxxable, as it's a highly niche system.
In this case the only rule I believe there is, is the prose. What sounds better when read out loud?
Literally looking at Elements of Style RN now to see if maybe I just don't remember but it doesn't have a chapter on the use of adjectives. 🤷🏻♂️
!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.
The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:
Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.
All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.
Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.
Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.
Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.
Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.
Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.
That's it.
Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.
Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.
Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.
Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.
On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.
If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.
Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.
If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.
Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.
Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.
Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.
Let everyone have their own content.
Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.
Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!
The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!