1660

As more and more details are being revealed about Rep. Lauren Boebert's wild night out in Denver last weekend — having been kicked out of "Beetlejuice" the musical for vaping and just generally being a public nuisance with her male companion — a full picture is coming together of what the other theater patrons around her that night had to endure.

Newly released footage of the night in question appears to show Boebert's exposed breasts being fondled by her date for an extended period of time while she, in turn, dawdles around in his lap with her hand. As many have pointed out on social media, having seen this footage, children were seated all around the couple that night, within viewing range of what they were up to.

"Laurent Boebert was jerking her date off in public while he gropes her in a theater where children were present and yet she continues to attack LGBTQ people as 'threats to children,'" writes journalist and clinical instructor Alejandra Caraballo on X, sharing the footage of Boebert in the act.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TinyPizza@kbin.social 426 points 1 year ago

What is this country coming to when you can't even go to a production of "Beetlejuice" and jerk your date off a bit while you get your hooters groped? Everyday our traditional American values of vaping indoors and being loud and unpleasant to those around us are being stripped away by cultural Marxists and the nanny state. How are our children going to meet their future husbands as minors at bowling alleys, when said husbands can't even publicly expose their genitalia without fear of the woke mob?

America isn't even half of what it used to be anymore! It's barely even Amer! That isn't even enough to guess the full word without the i, and soon enough we'll lose the r, and then none of us will ever get our tits wrenched in public again!

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 91 points 1 year ago

All jokes aside, you're quite a good writer 👏

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

This is all Consitutionally protected behavior.

The 1st Amendment riight of Freedom to Press the Button om the vape.

The 2nd amendment right to bare titties and arms.

The 4th amendment right gauranteeing freedom to sieze the cock.

And thos people that reported the vape should be arrested if they said "Fire" in a theater when mentioning the smoke.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 234 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Can you imagine the outrage if a Democrat did something like this? It would be front page news across the country, but this kind of vile behavior in front of children is just another day in GQPLand.

[-] lingh0e@lemmy.film 147 points 1 year ago

Al Franken resigned for way less.

load more comments (35 replies)
[-] febra@lemmy.world 188 points 1 year ago

Don't forget, people. It's always projection with conservatives. Next time you hear one scream about pedos, might as well start looking at their hard drives :)

[-] kameecoding@lemmy.world 91 points 1 year ago

do you guys not have an idiom for that?

in Hungarian we have (literally translated) : How one lives, thus they judge.

[-] Pencilnoob@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago

A classic that kind of means the same thing is "me thinks he doth protest too much" from Shakespeare to indicate someone who brings up a topic they are guilty of.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Bassman1805@lemmy.world 161 points 1 year ago

At Beetlejuice the Musical

Man, you know what really gets me going? A corny zombie hit man singing showtunes.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 155 points 1 year ago

Yeah but I’m sexually inappropriate for existing according to her

[-] Throbbing_Banjo@midwest.social 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah but she's straight white and cis so it isn't icky.

/S, obviously

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ericatty@infosec.pub 136 points 1 year ago

Why hasn't she been arrested for public nudity, sex acts in public, and all the upgrades for committing these crimes in front of minor children?

[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago

Everyone should start calling her a groomer I think. Just like everyone should refer to Gaetz as Groomer Gaetz.

They absolutely hate it when you turn their terms around on them.

load more comments (15 replies)
[-] FoundTheVegan@kbin.social 136 points 1 year ago

Unreal. Absolutely fucking unreal. And these people have the gall to call reading fully clothed at a library a sexual act, but here the fuck they jerking off on public in front of kids.

I know I'm not saying anything new or interesting, but as someone who has felt threatened by the conservative groomer language as of late, this really fucking gets to me.

😡

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 73 points 1 year ago

This quote by Sartre applies to Republicans

Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.

In other words, they don't care about reason or consistency. If you point out that what they said is contradictory they don't care.

You can't argue with them. You can't reason. They are consciously or otherwise operating from an emotional , literal nonsense, level of thought.

They need to be removed from power and I don't really care that much which box of liberty gets used to get the job done.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] WheeGeetheCat@sh.itjust.works 113 points 1 year ago

Just imagine the outrage and slandering of entire demographics that would be going on if there were a gay couple instead, or if this was something that happened at a drag show.

Just something to think about when you see your 'christian' republican relatives play this down

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Skaryon@lemmy.world 113 points 1 year ago

Exposing her boebs in public, giving her date a boener.

Disgusting boehavior

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] FarceMultiplier@lemmy.ca 100 points 1 year ago

So...were there children in the audience? Sounds like she could be forced to register as a sex offender under some American laws.

[-] Vaggumon@lemm.ee 55 points 1 year ago

There were, but for your idea to happen, the GOP would have to have feel shame and/or have honor to hold her accountable. And that's just not the case. If she was someone like AOC, or hell, any other DEM member, they would have already been forced to resign. But this is BoBo, classless, white trash, a upstanding symbol of everything Trumpers stand for.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 98 points 1 year ago

It's a good thing she isn't gay! Otherwise fondling someone's genitals in public around kids would have been a bad thing instead of a good thing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Ertebolle@kbin.social 97 points 1 year ago

I think at this point we can pretty much assume that anybody who makes public speeches about sexual perversion is, themself, a pervert.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 93 points 1 year ago

So. Uhm.

Groping and giving a handy in public seems to be illegal in Colorado. And probably sufficient to land her on the sexual offenders list.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 88 points 1 year ago

A Republican guilty of a sex crime, whaaaaaaatttt?

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 101 points 1 year ago

There's only one thing the gop loves more than LOUD projection and that's abusing kids. The party of the grand ol' pedophiles


  • NOTE: I'm reaching the character limit on Reddit posts, so here's a website with a list of about 1000 of these republican shit stains on humanity.
load more comments (13 replies)
[-] Pandantic@midwest.social 85 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For someone who is worried about the sanctity of marriage when gay people wanna do it, she sure is publicly stepping out on her husband before their divorce is finalized.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Fukled@lemmy.world 74 points 1 year ago

Is she divorced yet? Don't Christians frown on adultery too?

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] ViewSonik@lemmy.world 68 points 1 year ago

Lauren is a trashy piece if shit. Vaping in a thestre, letting her bf feel her huge tits in front of people and being a disgusting woman in general. Pretty insane times we’re living in these days. The republican party has very quickly turned from suited up war machine puppets to cigarette smoking, fake tits and orange makeup

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Neato@kbin.social 66 points 1 year ago

Indecent Exposure charges when?

[-] Rapidcreek@reddthat.com 66 points 1 year ago

You can take a woman out of a trailer, but not a trailer out of a woman.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 65 points 1 year ago
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] BolexForSoup@kbin.social 85 points 1 year ago

No need to shame honest hard working sex workers

[-] Nougat@kbin.social 53 points 1 year ago

They were shaming a dishonest sex worker.

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Chozo@kbin.social 56 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm just surprised that the man isn't Gaetz. They were 100% having an affair while she was still married to her pedophile husband.

Looks like exposing yourself in front of children is just Boebert's fetish. Odd choice for a GOP lackey, since they're always droning on and on about protecting children. Once again, the calls are coming from inside the house with them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why is watching Beetlejuice making these people so horny?

load more comments (7 replies)
[-] yukichigai@kbin.social 51 points 1 year ago

What even the fuck is this timeline?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2023
1660 points (96.9% liked)

politics

19145 readers
1667 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS