108
Val(r)u(l)e (feddit.nl)
submitted 1 month ago by lnxtx@feddit.nl to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Zwiebel@feddit.org 61 points 1 month ago

I'd be nice to have a color legend next to the y-axis of hue

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago

Or even better, change the color of the points and lines to match the associated hue.

That'd be nice.

90 and 120 are rolling through the greens. Are posters mostly green? That seems odd to me.

[-] bob_lemon@feddit.org 17 points 1 month ago

The problem is that averaging hue makes no sense at all because hue is not a longest scale.

If you take a red poster (0) and a blue poster (240), it averages to green. Or take red (0) and red (359), averaging to cyan (180).

[-] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago

The average of 0° and 359° is obviously 359.5°.

it's a radial scale.

[-] bob_lemon@feddit.org 9 points 1 month ago

By that logic, the average of red and cyan is both purple and lime. Still useless.

[-] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Not if there is a clear trend. If most movie posters are blue, three average will be blue.

But i agree, it is useless if there is no clear trend.

[-] Starbuncle@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

I wouldn't trust someone who tried to visualize hue like this to make that calculation correctly.

[-] flying_sheep@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago

You know what, I completely agree.

[-] Starbuncle@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

It would have made more sense if they had shown the distribution of hue as a polar graph and just had one every decade to show how it changes over time.

[-] shneancy@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

yeah that part of the graph is completely useless to people who haven't memorised the exact degrees of the scale, which is most people, even most artists

[-] beefbot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 1 month ago

Be nice to have the y axis start at zero so we could get a realistic sense of the fluctuations.

Yes yes this is pedantic for a chart about movie posters, but we’re all pretty desensitised to disinformation; feels useful to train myself to recognise it & speak out about it. The y axis isn’t visible, so the chart is misleading 🤷‍♂️

[-] filcuk@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago

The values changed so little compared to the full spectrum it wouldn't make sense.
You're not comparing to zero, but relative to values over time.
I agree with how it's presented.

[-] qaz@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Zooming out a little would at least show that the changes are minor.

[-] friendly_ghost@beehaw.org 9 points 1 month ago

I'd love to see this for luminance. I know my vision is getting worse, but I cannot see the goddamn Batman or anything else made in the last five years

[-] Starbuncle@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Value is essentially luminance.

[-] rosahaj@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago

is this loss?

this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
108 points (92.9% liked)

196

16582 readers
1868 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS