452
top 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

grab em by the pussy

[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz 10 points 9 hours ago

So anyway, all the tankies want you to vote for shill stein to help the serial pedophile/sexual deviant/criminal.

This is the tankie God lmao

[-] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 81 points 18 hours ago
[-] lulztard@reddthat.com 12 points 17 hours ago
[-] ravhall@discuss.online 9 points 14 hours ago

Surprised she was that old? Me too. Seems a little too old for both of them.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 102 points 21 hours ago

Karoline Leavitt, the press secretary for Donald Trump’s campaign, provided a statement denying the allegations, which said in part: “These accusations, made by a former activist for Barack Obama and announced on a Harris campaign call two weeks before the election, are unequivocally false. It’s obvious this fake story was contrived by the Harris campaign.”

I dunno, it sure seems like a pattern of behavior.

[-] TheBat@lemmy.world 14 points 14 hours ago

White, blonde, mid-20s. She doesn't know she's a potential victim too.

[-] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 6 hours ago

Oh, shit. Hadn't looked her up. It's only a matter of time.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 45 points 20 hours ago

If there’s a solid Epstein link with young girls, that could actually damage Trump.

[-] BruceTwarzen@lemm.ee 14 points 10 hours ago

Oh this thime they'll get him. This time for real. This isn't some treason or other rape alligation. This is real

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 1 points 9 hours ago

Somehow, I think we have different ideas what the word damage means.

[-] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 78 points 20 hours ago

Something tells me those that are already voting for him will not care. The Republican headquarters in my town has a vote felon sign up.

[-] Lurkinney@lemmy.world 39 points 19 hours ago

Actual video evidence of trump raping a screaming crying child would not change these people's minds, they do not subscribe to reality

[-] Irremarkable@fedia.io 29 points 20 hours ago

Will it change the mind of the hardcore MAGA base? Absolutely not. Will it make a large number of people switch from Trump to Harris? Probably not. It could, however, make some of the more reluctant Trump voters simply say fuck it and stay home.

[-] idiomaddict@lemmy.world 13 points 15 hours ago

I can’t think of a type of person for whom this is the line.

[-] jonne@infosec.pub 25 points 18 hours ago

There's already a ton of links that have been proven, even video. None of this will make a difference, that's already factored in. His voters are fine with him being a rapist.

[-] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 3 points 19 hours ago

Are you high? What makes you think that?

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Primarily due to the right's obsession with pedophilia and Epstien as well as he died under Trump and would make a juicy conspiracy. But, excuse me for having a opinion other than yours.

[-] BrokenGlepnir@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

These guys believe that epstien dying in federal prison under the purview of donald trump was a Clinton job. I don't trust them to have their minds changed.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago

Shrug...

This is a non story at this point.

this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
452 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19090 readers
4904 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS