142
Why America Has So Much Road Safety Research, But So Little Actual Safety — Streetsblog USA (usa.streetsblog.org)
submitted 3 weeks ago by regul@lemm.ee to c/fuck_cars@lemmy.ml
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] grue@lemmy.world 36 points 3 weeks ago

It's because practicing engineers (as opposed to road safety researchers, who are silo'd in academia) are obsessed with Level Of Service (LOS) for cars to the exclusion of all other concerns. Cyclists and pedestrians are a joke to them, whose safety is to be afforded lip service, at best.

Traffic engineers are people who would demolish a thriving main street to build a six-lane 55mph highway and have the utter gall to call it an "improvement." The entire industry is fundamentally fucked up, working from incorrect premises to achieve incorrect goals.

(Source: I used to work as a traffic engineer.)

[-] Nouveau_Burnswick@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Are you Chuck Mahon?

If not, it's great to see his affect on USA traffic engineering

[-] grue@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Part of me wishes I hadn't already changed careers before finding out about Strong Towns.

[-] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 weeks ago

why do these idiots build highways near city centers instead of on the edges, bypassing the buisness?

[-] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

A lot of them aren't given the problem of planning a city, its more like" hey this road is busy, design a bigger road since its so busy". But then their superiors belittle and threaten to fire them if they recomend building a tram line instead of 6+ lanes of car traffic. "The tram line isn't by the book", "we aren't some experiemental urbanist city" or "the projected level of car service isn't adeqaute for our predicted car traffic using models where the only transport option is driving"

[-] saigot@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I live in a town with a university with a big urban planning program. You can definitely see the effects. While there are some quirks (more roundabouts on one street than most cities have total) it also has amazing biking infrastructure for north America and lately has been closing street to cars in the downtown core. It is very refreshing and a big part of why i live where I do. I just wish every city could get these planners is all, i hope that in a decade or so the urban planners here will move on to other cities and have the seniority to spread the good ideas.

[-] ohellidk@sh.itjust.works 25 points 3 weeks ago

where I live, its safe to assume half the drivers on the road are drunk/tweaking.

[-] regul@lemm.ee 17 points 3 weeks ago

Well, the article's thesis is more that transportation/traffic engineers don't care. DoTs are set up to get grants and spend money, with a focus on throughput. Very little thought is put into safety, and most "safety" best practices are confusing, outdated, or poorly thought out.

[-] mindaika@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 weeks ago

Only half? That sounds like nice place!

[-] tunetardis@lemmy.ca 16 points 3 weeks ago

I wish there were more regulation on the size of private vehicles, particularly in North America. It's pretty clear at this point that what is contributing to higher pedestrian/cyclist fatalities despite better urban infrastructure is the increasing curb weight and ground clearance of automobiles. We can hope that collision-avoidance tech in newer models may reduce human-error type accidents, but at the end of the day, kinetic energy is a bitch.

I wonder how the EV transition will affect things? On the one hand, an EV would weigh more than an ICE of the same class since batteries are heavy. On the other hand, batteries are also the most expensive component by far and you need more in a larger vehicle, so from a dealer's perspective, the margins may not necessarily grow the bigger you go like with an ICE. The sweet spot might actually be something smaller. (In fact, for me, it's actually ebikes.)

[-] Fuzzy_Red_Panda@lemm.ee 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Another effect these oversized vehicles have is that they are generally safer for the occupants in the event of a crash, which means the driver doesn't have to worry about their safety or self-preservation as much, which means they crash into things more often from not paying close attention to their surroundings.

Unfortunately the rest of us who may get hit by one of these oversized vehichles don't have the luxury of being safer and not dying.

[-] tunetardis@lemmy.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah it's kind of an arm's race with people feeling they need to be the biggest thing on the road to feel safe. I've driven a few larger vehicles as airport rentals when they had nothing else in stock, and I've noticed they also tend to have a lot more blind spots than what I'm used to.

I remember when I was taking lessons, my instructor said I should think of the airbag as being a spring-loaded spike that will impale you if you screw up. I guess he was trying to impress on me that it's not good to feel safe and smug when you're driving? And actually, I've read since that air bags can be pretty violent when they go off, so he may not have been as far from the truth as I thought?

[-] qjkxbmwvz@startrek.website 10 points 3 weeks ago

Step one: join local bike coalition.

Step two: become a single-iseue voter and only vote for their endorsements.

Only half joking here.

It's not perfect in my city, but it is getting better, which is awesome to see

in the past 7 or so years that I've lived here it has gotten way way better. The pandemic helped a ton (slow streets implemented in a really great way among other things).

this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
142 points (99.3% liked)

Fuck Cars

9806 readers
76 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
uthredii@lemmy.ml
uthredii@beehaw.org