263
submitted 21 hours ago by trespasser69@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.world

better version of: https://lemmy.world/post/21210097

<3

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] pyre@lemmy.world 1 points 3 minutes ago

except W instead of P. I don't really need that shit.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 3 minutes ago

A European shout out to Ghostery who auto refuses everything on our GDPR popups.

[-] Valmond@lemmy.world 1 points 6 minutes ago

I read, "With Butter"

Gotta finish my coffee

[-] psmgx@lemmy.world 10 points 2 hours ago

Why is Badger bad?

[-] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 hours ago

Advanced kit: add NoScript and block first party scripts by default. Works surprisingly well for visiting sites you don't care about, just want to read the article etc. Just switch it off if you're trying to buy something and get through the checkout.

[-] LegoBrickOnFire@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

You could add that extension that replaces clickbait titles by community-made descriptive ones. (lemmy do your thing and find the name please)

[-] lelfr@jlai.lu 1 points 1 hour ago

It's DeArrow

[-] slazer2au@lemmy.world 51 points 20 hours ago

Consent-o-matic instead of cookies and adnausem instead of ublock origin.

Consent-o-matic will actively opt out of popups.

Adnausem is built on top of ublock origin and will silently "click" on the ads behind the scenes to mess up your advertising profile and cost the advertisers money.

[-] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 hours ago

Adnausem is built on top of ublock origin and will silently "click" on the ads behind the scenes to mess up your advertising profile and cost the advertisers money.

Tried it a couple of months ago. Didn't nearly work as well as uBlock Origin, seemed buggy as hell.

[-] Nonononoki@lemmy.world 8 points 3 hours ago

uBlock Origin can just hide cookie pop ups if you enable said filter, and AdNauseam still loads the ad so you still have slower page loading speed and increased network traffic.

[-] toothpaste_sandwich@feddit.nl 6 points 15 hours ago

Oooo. Now that's something to try.

[-] lime@feddit.nu 16 points 17 hours ago

the return dislike plugin is just stupid. it's a community database now, so rather than being based on the actual number of dislikes on youtube it's based on the dislikes of the people who have the plugin.

it used to be that it actually got the real numbers but youtube removed that endpoint so now it's just a misanthropic echo chamber.

[-] HeavyRaptor@lemmy.zip 28 points 16 hours ago

It's better than nothing. Also I'd probably weigh the opinion of people who have the extension higher than of those who don't.

[-] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 16 hours ago

Is it? personally, when i think of "people who want to see the dislike bar" my mind equates that to "people who want to dislike", and that's not a group of people i want to interact with.

[-] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 11 points 12 hours ago

To me it wrings more of "people who want to know before they waste 20 minutes whether this video is clickbait, just actually false, rightwing conspiracy theories, or has some massive editing flaw that makes the video pointless.

[-] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 10 hours ago

For that, I prefer DeArrow. Gets you community sourced, informative titles for videos (and removes clickbait thumbnails as well)

[-] starelfsc2@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 hours ago

This is why I use it, also the more people who use it the more accurate it is

[-] 30p87@feddit.org 8 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

It's honestly relatively representative afaik

Even though it, SponsorBlock etc. could just be neglected by using piped or just federated alternatives.

[-] lime@feddit.nu 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

how can we even know that though? there's no stats anymore.

also, if peertube et al got bigger, surely sponsorblock would be useful there as well? if creators would use those services because people were on them, sponsors would contact those creators because they got the views.

[-] 30p87@feddit.org 4 points 16 hours ago

It subjectively feels right, and instances where creators leaked the numbers the RTYTD stats matched pretty closely.

Until peertube grows to that size, it's still a long time. Then it would be useful.

[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 39 points 21 hours ago

What's wrong with privacy badger?

[-] rikudou@lemmings.world 79 points 21 hours ago

Not OP, but what puts me off is that it calls itself badger, but really it's just a software that has nothing in common with those glorious animals. Did you know that badgers' keen sense of smell is about 800 times sharper than our own?

[-] drolex@sopuli.xyz 41 points 20 hours ago

!subscribe to badger facts

[-] rikudou@lemmings.world 4 points 10 hours ago

Did you know that badgers keep their homes in tip-top shape by creating a latrine pit as a bathroom? They won’t defecate in their homes, instead making a pit out of dried grass and leaves just outside their burrow.

[-] Dasnap@lemmy.world 28 points 20 hours ago

I think UBO makes it redundant.

[-] friend_of_satan@lemmy.world 9 points 19 hours ago

The layered security model has redundancy built in as a feature.

Privacy Badger has historically allowed tracking until it successfully identifies a domain as a likely tracker. Like the air bags going off after you've already wrapped your car around a telephone pole. But it's now been changed and is now closer to a list-based tracker blocker (enumerate badness):

Privacy Badger no longer learns from your browsing by default, as “local learning” may make you more identifiable to websites.

They've since corrected one of the core issues with PB by doing so, but it still it is very weak. To see why, please glance through The Six Dumbest Ideas in Computer Security.

uBlock Origin in advanced mode, with default-deny rules (only allow assets by exception) is going to be much stronger at blocking crap.

Personally, I use uMatrix with pretty much all asset classes blocked by default. I never see popups. I never see banners begging "please allow our cookies, pleeeeaaase!".

[-] trespasser69@lemmy.world 15 points 20 hours ago

Well, it can be replaced with uBlock Origin and some people dont recomend it anymore

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] errer@lemmy.world 16 points 18 hours ago

Need to add a pihole to that stack

[-] Barzaria@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 15 hours ago

I love my pie hole and I love the functionality of being able to access a VPN and use on my home network stuff on the go it's pretty good

[-] undercrust@lemmy.ca 5 points 14 hours ago

Is the one in the bottom left actually called "No Need YT Ads"? Cause I can't find that one

[-] palmtrees2308@lemmy.one 3 points 14 hours ago

It must be Invidious alternative frontend for youtube

[-] Barzaria@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 15 hours ago

I just installed consentomatic right now and I didn't know it existed thank you

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 13 points 19 hours ago

Pretty soon, Firefox will need to be replaced with Waterfox and LibreWolf, unfortunately.

[-] Gormadt@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 18 hours ago
[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 13 points 18 hours ago

People at the top of Mozilla Org making crappy decisions.

[-] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I use Waterfox on my gaming computer and I love it.

[-] Defectus@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago
[-] bobo@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Does this actually work? I just tried it on a story on The Atlantic website and I just got a print page that looks exactly like the locked paywall page (i.e. not the whole article).

I use the web archives extension for firefox to easily get the archive.is version of pages. Unfortunately, doesn't work when I'm using a vpn, but otherwise works like a charm.

[-] Defectus@lemmy.world 1 points 57 minutes ago

I haven't tried it yet :)

[-] MTK@lemmy.world 6 points 19 hours ago
[-] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 1 points 15 hours ago

Librewolf instead of firefox

[-] BackOnMyBS@lemmy.autism.place 2 points 18 hours ago

Just installed Consent-o-matic and Unpaywalled. Thanks!

[-] leraje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 16 hours ago

Not sure that its a must have and possibly uBO could handle it if I could be bothered to check but I like LocalCDN too.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
263 points (95.8% liked)

memes

10040 readers
4116 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS