128
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] REgon@hexbear.net 86 points 4 weeks ago

rip Mao you would've loved GPS

[-] roux@hexbear.net 30 points 4 weeks ago
[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 9 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Imagine the communist party with working GPS somehow in like 1924, we might have falgsc by now

[-] kristina@hexbear.net 79 points 4 weeks ago
[-] Hexboare@hexbear.net 63 points 4 weeks ago

Mao: how racist can Americans be

grillman

[-] CleverOleg@hexbear.net 61 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

When Mao was right - which was most of the time - he was right.

But when he wrong… well…

[-] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 40 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

This is a lack of cultural exposure tbh, I think he just geniunely didn't understand how bad American society really is.

[-] GenderIsOpSec@hexbear.net 32 points 4 weeks ago

he also thought that the soviet union was the most imperialist force, on the same earth on which the usa also resided so... shrug-outta-hecks

[-] CleverOleg@hexbear.net 13 points 4 weeks ago

This was also true of Marx and Engels, imo.

[-] Mardoniush@hexbear.net 34 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

He understood extractive imperialism perfectly but not settler colonialism. What he did understand of it he got from the wildly different experience of French African settler colonialism.

It's like that difference between the apartheid and the genocidal state that's come up recently.

An apartheid state wants the oppressed groups to do all the work. A genocidal state just wants them gone.

The US is both, genocidal to First Nations, apartheid to non whites.

Look, man, the sparrows deserved it

[-] buh@hexbear.net 54 points 4 weeks ago

Mao should have read Settlers

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 53 points 4 weeks ago

Mao, armed with settlers and Dragon Ball Z, would be unstoppable.

[-] CliffordBigRedDog@hexbear.net 52 points 4 weeks ago

Um Mao should read settlers

nerd

[-] FunkYankkkees@hexbear.net 48 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Unless you have investigated a problem, you will be deprived of the right to speak on it. Isn't that too harsh? Not in the least. When you have not probed into a problem, into the present facts and its past history, and know nothing of its essentials, whatever you say about it will undoubtedly be nonsense. Talking nonsense solves no problems, as everyone knows, so why is it unjust to deprive you of the right to speak? Quite a few comrades always keep their eyes shut and talk nonsense, and for a Communist that is disgraceful. How can a Communist keep his eyes shut and talk nonsense?

Comrade Mao - 1930

Oof

[-] TrueStalinistPatriot@hexbear.net 20 points 4 weeks ago

You should come to the Christmas eve with my family you would quickly change your opinion

[-] FunkYankkkees@hexbear.net 18 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Do they agree with Comrade Mao's assessment of white USAmericans?

[-] TrueStalinistPatriot@hexbear.net 35 points 4 weeks ago

I doubt that they even held a book written by Mao but what stuck with me was my dad unironically saying "normally on the ISS artificial gravity is turned on"

[-] Wheaties@hexbear.net 22 points 4 weeks ago

yer dad, and yer dad alone, knows the mystery behind gravity

[-] TrueStalinistPatriot@hexbear.net 28 points 4 weeks ago
[-] SchillMenaker@hexbear.net 20 points 4 weeks ago

Did you respond with "I only trust natural gravity, that artificial stuff will give you cancer."?

[-] TrueStalinistPatriot@hexbear.net 14 points 4 weeks ago
[-] SchillMenaker@hexbear.net 14 points 4 weeks ago

It's a gift of mine. Snakes can unhinge their jaw, I can unhinge my mind.

[-] ThermonuclearEgg@hexbear.net 17 points 4 weeks ago

"normally on the ISS artificial gravity is turned on"

Lol. They have studied artificial gravity, but the whole point of the ISS is to experiment in zero gravity

[-] TrueStalinistPatriot@hexbear.net 9 points 4 weeks ago

yeah like exactly

[-] Diuretic_Materialism@hexbear.net 38 points 4 weeks ago

Mao confirmed D$A Kkkaren KKKracKKKer bleach demon!

[-] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 35 points 4 weeks ago

Hitler particle detectors were rudimentary back then, in his defense

[-] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 9 points 4 weeks ago

You couldn't just carry them around, it took a room full of tape drives

[-] TrueStalinistPatriot@hexbear.net 31 points 4 weeks ago

When does "Revolutionary optimism" transform into "Revolutionary delusion"

[-] JillOfAllTrades@hexbear.net 31 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

I think about this quote a lot with regard to the hexbear-type thing of trying to make this hybrid of socialism (i.e economic reform) and american identity politics. Like trying to mix Maoism with this "KKKracka lol" stuff

It's not just this one quote either. A core idea of Maoism is to unite people along class lines only. See also On the Correct Handling of Contradictions Among the People.

[-] thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net 37 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

Its not a hexbear type thing, the amerikkka stuff comes from the black power movement in the 1960s of which ~~many~~ some (like the black panthers) were influenced by Mao's teachings, thats the origin of the syntesis, not from some site made from a banned subreddit.

[-] sweet_pecan@hexbear.net 11 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

theres no reason to assume amerikkka has any connection to Maoists specify. last i checked the earliest source was from a magazine called black socialist world not specifically maoist. so like I cant believe I have to say this but no not all black people are maoist or were influenced by Maoism you cannot assume that to defend your point about how you hate all white people and somehow that HAS to fit into your political ideology. please be serious its aave you people (hexbears) need to stop with this misinfo.

edit to be clear go off on white people, just dont spread misinfo about aave while you do it! also im sorry but this is a basic tenet of maoism. if you disagree with this is think you just dont like maoism, and thats ok!

[-] JillOfAllTrades@hexbear.net 10 points 4 weeks ago

It's hard for americans to shake essentialist views about race and come to a Marxist understanding –

  • Their conservatives have essentiallist racist views

  • The liberal 白左 aren't interested in coming to a correct view – "Our dogmatists are lazy-bones" – they're interested in showing off how good a person they are by howling idealist noises on social media

Both their propaganda mills are pushing them to divide the working class based on race; getting to a correct, structuralist understanding of race is hard.

Also Americans are insular and can't understand that the world ≠ America

Mao is definitely the best path out: the Little Red Book, the Mass Line, On The Correct Handling of Contradictions Among The People.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] spectre@hexbear.net 9 points 4 weeks ago

Hard pill to swallow maybe is that if you "like" modern China, you can't be a maoist. There's sort of a contradiction in supporting both (I'm not exactly sure what I mean by "support", but, you know....)

Mao underestimsted the power of american racism

[-] 2Password2Remember@hexbear.net 30 points 4 weeks ago

implying there are intellectuals in the united states

Death to America

[-] FourteenEyes@hexbear.net 30 points 4 weeks ago

missed the crackers and hit the sparrows smh

[-] Barx@hexbear.net 28 points 4 weeks ago

Stoked to show this to some Maoists I know

[-] CarbonScored@hexbear.net 25 points 4 weeks ago

Yeah okay the doomerism is too much kiryu-slam

[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 24 points 4 weeks ago

Mao made 30% mistakes, what can I say.

[-] Frank@hexbear.net 24 points 4 weeks ago

Fs in the chat

F

[-] wombat@hexbear.net 20 points 4 weeks ago

the maoist uprising against the landlords was the largest and most comprehensive proletarian revolution in history, and led to almost totally-equal redistribution of land among the peasantry

[-] anaesidemus@hexbear.net 20 points 4 weeks ago

anakin-padme-2 In the final analysis, national struggle is a matter of class struggle. Among the whites in the United States, it is only the reactionary ruling circles that oppress the black people. They can in no way represent the workers, farmers, revolutionary intellectuals and other enlightened persons who comprise the overwhelming majority of the white people.

anakin-padme-3

anakin-padme-4

[-] ChaosMaterialist@hexbear.net 18 points 4 weeks ago
[-] CoolerOpposide@hexbear.net 18 points 4 weeks ago

1963 version of Xi saying he would be a democrat

[-] darkmode@hexbear.net 17 points 4 weeks ago

Mao didn’t live in a time where class politics were pretty much obliterated from the average burgerprole’s conscience so this take gets a 70/100

All whites are inherently racist and must be purged

this post was submitted on 29 Oct 2024
128 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13551 readers
698 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS