1396
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 418_im_a_teapot@lemmy.world 24 points 13 hours ago

You want hypocrisy? Wait until you see the 180° flip on mail-in voting after this election. They’ve been telling us for five years that mail-in ballots are all fraudulent. Now that Democrats are telling women they can use in-person voting to undermine their husbands, I guarantee they will push to make mail-in voting far easier and shut down more polling places.

3D chess my ass.

[-] ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net 15 points 13 hours ago

Jeez, Men getting upset at their wife being allowed to vote anonymously... What wimps.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] robocall@lemmy.world 25 points 16 hours ago

If Epstein died during the Biden administration, Biden would have been blamed, and if there were pictures of them together, and creepy video of Biden talking about Epstein's preference for young girls, it would have been the only thing Republicans would discuss for years. But when it's Trump - they are silent.

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world 18 points 14 hours ago

They have always been hypocrites, assholes and cheaters.

Imagine if 9/11 happened during Obama's term and he just sat there with a stupid look on his face reading books to children, the right would have lost its shit.

[-] Illuminostro@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

To play Devil's Advocate, Dubya is an idiot, and he was literally in shock.

"Dick lied to be. He said all I needed to do was read the script, and smile. I didn't sign up for THIS shit!"

[-] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 5 points 15 hours ago

And there is sworn, corroborated testimony of a woman who had to pleasured Biden when she was a teenager while wearing a white glove there probably would have been riots in front of the white house.

[-] chakan2@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

They ARE still talking about Biden. The whole hair sniffing thing that went around. One of them brought that up the other day...Dude...you know Biden isn't in the race anymore right?

[-] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 10 points 14 hours ago

I was at a brewery a few months back when Biden was giving an announcement, this was before he dropped out of the race. I was mildly enjoying myself until some guy came in with his wife and just went off on Biden, and specifically orbited around "hunter needs him to stay in office so he can stay out of jail". Dude was wearing an FOP shirt so he's obviously an expert on knowing when felons should or shouldn't be in jail...

[-] RoidingOldMan@lemmy.world 15 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

It's more projection. Trump needs to win so he can stay out of jail. Probably the only reason he's running at all.

[-] orbitz@lemmy.ca 4 points 11 hours ago

I bet another big reason is that he can hold rallies and get his narcissistic high. Has to be awesome for a narcissist to hold events where people are there just to hear him ramble.

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 3 points 11 hours ago

No no no, it only counts when "Others" do it, our own sins are "forgivable" for we are special, if we weren't we wouldn't be us.

[-] Suavevillain@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

They went almost for like 4 years about that laptop.

[-] Knock_Knock_Lemmy_In@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Well, the FBI did their best to cover it up, which is very suspicious.

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

Conservatives often want an in-group, that is protected by law, but is not bound by it; and an out-group, not protected by law, but bound by it. Get ready for this to get way worse in case of a Trump victory, alongside with crackpot dictators starting a dick measurement contest of who can ban the most harmless things in the shortest amount of time.

[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Typical Government of Putin shit. Did anyone listen to recordings provided by Wolfe?

[-] Minarble@aussie.zone 39 points 1 day ago
[-] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 132 points 1 day ago

"Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

[-] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

Who said this

Wilhoit’s law

Frank Wilhoit not to be confused with Francis M. Wilhoit

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
1396 points (98.5% liked)

People Twitter

5162 readers
2058 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a tweet or similar
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS