253
I'm so goddamn sick of common ground talks from Democrats
If you're in the minority and want to get anything done, you need to find common ground with at least some of the majority. It's just math.
There is no common ground though. And republicans when in the minority have not sought common ground, they've sought to divide, partner with foreign adversaries and cozy up to monsters. In the last 40 years, in a speed run since Newt Gingrich, have stopped trying to work together for the country and only seek absolute power.
"Meet me in the middle says the unjust man.
You take a step forward, he takes a step back.
Meet me in the middle says the unjust man."
Also worth mentioning they aren't the majority. They just hold more seats because of historical inequities in law and active disenfranchisement of voters.
Also gerrymandering
Non-USian here, wondering what this Biden impeachment thing is I'm hearing about for the first time. Is there anything more to it than "well they impeached our guy"?
You're right, it is revenge for applying justice to wrong doing. Objectively there is no evidence of Biden doing anything criminal but the conservatives want to push the idea that if their leader can be brought up on criminal charges then it applies to anyone - even a sitting president.
Clinton was impeached because we "almost impeached" Nixon. And to distract from his as well as Reagan and Bush's crimes. Now that we've actually held a Republican minorly to account in a largely meaningless way. Republicans have become fully unhinged. And after a setback of nearly 100 years, finally fully ready to openly embrace fascism again. Persecuting and prosecuting people simply for who they are.
Nope. It's all for revenge and for keeping their base riled up and misinformed.
It's revenge and nothing else
I think it's slightly more than just that. With this inquiry, as bullshit as it is, they can with the next elections tell their base "see? Theyr guy got impeached too!"
It's a bullshit strategy, but a strategy nonetheless and it'll work because their base isn't exactly known for being highly educated or well informed
That's pretty much it. The goppers have raging butthurt over their guy getting caught (several times).
That's about it, but to be clear it's an impeachment inquiry, which is basically opening an investigation. Could more evidence be uncovered by that investigation? Sure, that's the point. But will enough be found to prove high crimes or misdemeanors, have articles of impeachment written up, be brought to a vote, and actually impeach the president? Highly unlikely, and it only gets less likely with each step. Oh, and that says nothing about the Democrat-controlled Senate that needs a 2/3 vote to convict.
Good let them turn on each other and consume themselves like the rabid dogs they are
Fuck ‘em. Traitors, one and all.
Some Republicans were outraged that Jefferies used the term "civil war" to describe what their party is going through. I wonder if they were just as outraged when some Republicans, like Greene, said that red states should secede.
Christ, and these people have a real chance of installing the toxic orange again.
The cons are completely unserious about addressing any real issues. It's all about owning the libs, punching down on others, and completely fucking up the (real) economy.
The adult in the room.
this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2023
253 points (97.7% liked)
politics
19089 readers
1687 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS