210
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by berrytopylus@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

Nobody could have predicted this. I have my doubts even when they call it "spying equipment" or whatever considering Chinese claim it was a meteorological balloon, certainly no doubt they would try to paint those tools as such.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] oregoncom@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago

This sounds like a weird cope though. This is exactly what I expect the media to say if it actually was spy balloon that managed to acquire some top secret intel.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] WIIHAPPYFEW@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago

WHO

THE FUCK

WOULDA THUNK IT

[-] Tachanka@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Extremely secure government confident in its legitimacy

Xi Jinping was reached for comment: "These burgers think I need a balloon? Motherfucker I can go on google maps and see your damn swimming pool in HD!" xigma-male

[-] NoGodsNoMasters@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago

I like how the image captions still refer to the balloon as "possibly on an espionage mission" and "the suspected Chinese surveillance balloon" lmao

[-] BadTakesHaver@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

thats what THEY WANT YOU TO THINK

[-] RyanGosling@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It becomes more clear when you remember that this isn’t the first time the US spent millions of military dollars to fire at unknown objects in the sky

The difference is that Battle of LA is a lot more intense, maybe justified, and spooky which makes it more interesting.

[-] kristina@hexbear.net 16 points 1 year ago
[-] Lemmygradwontallowme@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

Next time, if such incident goes again, I will buy fucking 99 harmless balloons, humming to this beat, and lead them towards the Pentagon.

[-] Tachanka@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] SupFBI@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago

It's not a spy balloon. But what if it was? think-about-it

[-] usernamesaredifficul@hexbear.net 14 points 1 year ago
[-] PZK@hexbear.net 13 points 1 year ago

Who would have thought a balloon is not useful for spying. You have little to no control over its direction, it isn't discrete, and most silly of all, why use that when you have satellites?

I guess the US was outwitted by a balloon after spending billions of dollars on cutting edge spy planes and powerful satellite cameras.

[-] moujikman@hexbear.net 11 points 1 year ago

Of course they still don't see a difference between scientific sensors and spying equipment.

[-] booty@hexbear.net 9 points 1 year ago

woaow what a suuuuurprise! shocked-dino

[-] at_an_angle@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

I don't care what it was. Keep your cheap balloons out of my air space.

(⌐■_■)

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2023
210 points (100.0% liked)

news

23563 readers
574 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS