102

Map where Democrat states have been given to Canada

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

I briefly saw this meme on my dad's phone while he was browsing facebook. He's a right wing Trump voter.

So take from that what you will.

[-] PhrygianFudge@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago

Yep, this is originally a righty post. That's why I'm so confused that it's actually kind of based. The rough consensus here is that it's based, so we have bi-partisan support. Let's get this on the Congress floor!

[-] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 2 days ago

Oh man, I would love to see this happen. Republicans in Texas would be frothing at the mouth to see California gone, right up until they had to start paying for all the other republican states that can’t manage to support themselves.

[-] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 18 points 2 days ago

Red states are the real welfare queens

[-] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 65 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Feels like it'd solve a lot of problems.

[-] BingBong@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 days ago

JFC, find a way to take new Mexico and maybe Colorado as well.

[-] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 21 points 3 days ago

Alberta is the wrong colour.

[-] borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago

Yeah, trade Virginia for Alberta.

[-] cmbabul@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Could we airlift Atlanta out of Georgia instead?

[-] Cheems@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago

I prefer this one because my state's in it

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] jwiggler@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago

Jesusland makes me chuckle

[-] bitchkat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Wisconsin can fuck off and die. But this will give Canadia control of most of the great lakes.

[-] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

New ones will be provided.

[-] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

More like orangejesus land

[-] mvirts@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago

Let's be real, it's city vs. country no matter where you are.

[-] Comrade_Spood@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago

It really isn't, Maine is rural af. We're called the South of the North for a reason. However we are weirdly progressive for how rural we are

[-] mvirts@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It's definitely not a clear cut rule, but generally places with higher population density vote more blue

Data from 2020 here: https://engaging-data.com/election-population-density/

I'm interested in how this is changing, my understanding is that many rural areas were more liberal historically.

[-] Comrade_Spood@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago

Yeah it is generally higher population density means more progressive. Maine is just weird. Even historically. Historically very pro-abolition, also pretty pro-women's suffrage, also very pro-prohibition. However the state also didn't start voting democrat till around the 60s or 70s. Fairly early legalizers of marijuana and also fairly quick for gay marriage.

[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 5 points 2 days ago

Not even.

Maricopa County is effectively one giant suburb and the numbers were about 50-50 for each candidate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 42 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Canada's population is 40 million. This would add 80ish (edit:) million more people to that. So, it's not Canada annexing the blue states, it's the blues states seceding and then annexing Canada to achieve territorial contiguity.

[-] PhrygianFudge@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 3 days ago

No annexing. The blue states join with Canada to establish a union of states. We could call it "United States" or something, or idk, I'm not good with names.

[-] Zachariah@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

Since the remaining states are run by a convict, they could be the Con-federated States or something like that.

[-] AFallingAnvil@lemmy.ca 23 points 3 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

United Provinces, we don't need to keep baggage associated with United States

[-] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

I think there were more than 80 people in Oregon alone

[-] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

The math checks out.

[-] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

Lol, fixed it

[-] xploit@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago

Can we swap Albertans with Coloradans though?

[-] EonNShadow@pawb.social 6 points 2 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CptInsane0@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago

Not even remotely based. States are not internally homogenous. "Let's take all the Democrats and job with Canada" is a shitlib take.

[-] PhrygianFudge@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 3 days ago

I'm hearing a "cringe" here, though I've heard quite a few "based"s (no consesus as is tradition for leftist discourse) ... I think "based" is winning?

[-] Rezeroed@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago

I guess Colorado and New Mexico get hung out to dry.

[-] beebarfbadger@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago
[-] IceBlade@lemmynsfw.com 8 points 2 days ago

"Based" is just slang. It generally has a positive connotation. So the original poster is essentially asking if this is a good idea or not.

[-] PhrygianFudge@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

Signing up on that instance and then going on political communities' posts is such a power-move

[-] RmDebArc_5@sh.itjust.works 14 points 3 days ago

Question is, does Canada want you?

[-] Bougie_Birdie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 days ago

I hear California's always on fire, so it'll fit right in with our west coast

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Breve@pawb.social 8 points 2 days ago

As a Canadian who sees the far-right politics of the USA leaking across the border, I actually think this would be a good idea. The US can have Alberta though, I think they would be happier there.

[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago

As an Albertan, please no

[-] daggermoon@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago
[-] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago

Absolutely not. Saw Florida off and let it sink.

[-] Somethingcheezie@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

Better divide Oregon and Washington states in half. The east side of each state all voted red. Not sure how California voted.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Noooo I live in NH take me with you

[-] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 4 points 2 days ago

Add Southeast Pennsylvania.

[-] xxd@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 3 days ago

The swing states are gonna be kicking themselves that they missed this chance after they come back to their senses.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Dorkyd68@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Wait for me i wanna come too. I just gotta move out of my red state first, ca sounds nice, real nice

[-] Smorty@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 3 days ago

Seems pretty reasonable. I'd like that.

[-] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

This produces good feelings.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
102 points (89.2% liked)

Lefty Memes

4335 readers
1442 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS