24
submitted 2 days ago by Blaze@lemmy.cafe to c/movies@lemm.ee
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BenFranklinsDick@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Its RT score is under Gladiator now.

[-] Emperor@feddit.uk 9 points 2 days ago

Update: Since publication, the score is down to a 77%, just under Gladiator now, though still Ridley Scott’s highest scoring movie since The Last Duel.

Still solid for what is an unnecessary sequel that could easily have fallen on it's face (naming no names but Scott has form for that).

[-] UKFilmNerd@feddit.uk 6 points 1 day ago

It's when articles say it's "only" got 77% in reviews and act like that's a terrible thing. Surely 50% would be a truly average film.

[-] Assman@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

No thanks. 20 year old movies don't need sequels.

this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
24 points (90.0% liked)

movies

1761 readers
178 users here now

Warning: If the community is empty, make sure you have "English" selected in your languages in your account settings.

🔎 Find discussion threads

A community focused on discussions on movies. Besides usual movie news, the following threads are welcome

Related communities:

Show communities:

Discussion communities:

RULES

Spoilers are strictly forbidden in post titles.

Posts soliciting spoilers (endings, plot elements, twists, etc.) should contain [spoilers] in their title. Comments in these posts do not need to be hidden in spoiler MarkDown if they pertain to the title’s subject matter.

Otherwise, spoilers but must be contained in MarkDown.

2024 discussion threads

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS