63
submitted 1 month ago by credo@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] BassTurd@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Now supply a whole shit load of long range missiles before January.

[-] MyTurtleSwimsUpsideDown@fedia.io 6 points 1 month ago
[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Too little too late unfortunately

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

Putin doesn't want to escalate before he can get his cuckold so now's about as best of a time that Ukraine can kneecap Russia before Trump draws the line and just hands over eastern Ukraine.

[-] credo@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

I believe NYT makes you login, even on a gift link. Here is a TLDR:

President Biden has authorized Ukraine to use U.S.-supplied long-range Army Tactical Missile Systems (ATACMS) to strike Russian and North Korean forces in Russia, a significant shift in U.S. policy. This decision comes in response to Russia’s introduction of North Korean troops into the conflict and their anticipated assault on Ukrainian forces in the Kursk region.

The move reflects growing concerns over Ukraine’s ability to withstand simultaneous assaults while defending territory. The authorization aims to bolster Ukraine’s defense, target high-value military assets, and deter North Korean involvement. However, it has sparked debate among U.S. officials over escalation risks, as Russia might retaliate against the U.S. or its allies.

President-elect Donald Trump, who has vowed to reduce U.S. support for Ukraine, is set to take office in two months, adding urgency to the decision. The Ukrainian strategy may include using captured Russian territory in Kursk as leverage in potential future negotiations. Meanwhile, the risk of Russian countermeasures remains a central concern for Biden’s administration and its allies.

My take: I’ve been waiting on this since the US election. It’s sound strategy of we believe Putin won’t want to escalate with NATO before Trump takes office.

[-] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

The strategy isn't help Ukraine win, right? It's to rachet up the difficulty every mile Russia advances in order to drain them as much as possible..

[-] wandermind@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago

A worthy goal in itself, and doubly so when it also helps Ukraine.

[-] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago
[-] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If the West wanted to minimise Ukrainian deaths then they could do something like draw clear lines in the sand so that Russia publicly knows at what points their continued action leads to Western escalation (defensive escalation). Surely that's a clearer deterrent and would save Ukrainian lives. Instead we've got what looks like European bickering and prevarication and eventually somewhat reluctant support. So maybe that's genuinely what's going on. Or if it's an act I'm sure it's for well thought out psychological reasons. But as an act it seems to rather encourage Russia to keep pushing, because they hope Western support will falter. So if that's all deliberate it seems more about draining Russia than helping Ukraine. (With hundreds of thousands of Ukrainian lives sacrificed in the process)

this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
63 points (95.7% liked)

World News

39367 readers
827 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS