That's cute, but if you don't do shit with the feedback, then it doesn't really matter how big the playtest is, eh?

Sources say that playtests with external players are happening much more frequently than in past installments, and the amount of data and feedback collected is the most the franchise has seen in its history. From small feedback sessions to large-scale player tests, Battlefield is now taking the much-needed “player first” approach.

Alright, let's wait for more info other than "sources say", then.

I like new Battlefield launches because 2 weeks later people get bored and boot up Battlebit instead.

I have no doubt this game will flop. It will be on the sales bin for like 5 bucks in 90 days.

I would be very interested in a BF3 remaster (and the earlier games too) but anything else is justs no thanks I'm good.

Was there ever a point in history where a Battlefield game didn't have a poor launch? I still remember 1942 the day of launch, tanks were flying everywhere. The CGW headline for their review of the game being "Mein gott! Die British haben un panzerflagen!"

$10 says launch is still a shit show you can’t play test for hundreds of thousands of players without hundreds of thousands of players

God. I member BF4s PC launch. I bought a pc and it was my first game I was hyped for. I truly thought console was just better for a bit cause of how fucking bad that game was at launch lmao

On launch 2042 was complete crap but I had some fun with it two years ago. I particularly liked being able to swap out my weapon attachments on the fly.

Obviously they will stick with things that make money making it a call of duty look-alike, the same way they have done with 2042.

I've played 2042 just because Ps Plus gave it for free and I used mostly portals.

BfV was good with updates, but because of EA they never finished the game and we never saw Russia in a WWII game.