Ceos and politicians.

ai as in AI: aircraft auto-landing and pitch levelling. near-boundary ship navigation. train/ freight logistics. protein folding. gene mapping.

ai as in LLM/ PISS: hmmm... downlevel legalese to collegiate-, 6th-grade-, or even street-level prose. do funny abridged shorts. imo, training-wheels to some shakespearean writing is appreciated.

CEO's. Any executive role, for that matter

Scammers. They are so stupid. AI is much more convincing.

I think many things that solicitors do could be easily replaced with AI since it's just parsing the contents of documents and then writing a few templated summaries.

Currently very few jobs should be replaced with AI. But many jobs should be augmented with AI. Human-in-the-loop AI amplify the finate resource of smart humans.

None.

(UK) Government.

It could not be any worse than the most-obvious self-serving pocket-liners of this century.

None.

Politician

Illustrators. Actors. Animators. Writers. Editors. Directors. Let's make art impossible to sell so we can get back to proper starving, errr... I mean... making art as a form of expression rather than commerce.

none. it may help with under staffed areas for them to function a bit but it really is no good to do things on its own.

Reform tax law and get rid of 90% of the IRS. Computers could do all that shit if we simplified the system. Will never happen, though.

None. Sorry just my opinion.

Look at the unemployment numbers. Tell me it's a good idea to have less jobs.

Realistically, a lot of the stock photo industry. If a few people can generate pictures on demand, you won't really need anyone doing sets, lights, wardrobe, etc for a series of generic photos .

None. Maybe some middle management, but even then, until AI fixes the hallucinations for good, in useless

None, not because it can't but because if it does then people won't be able to make an income. This is already a problem.