38

its over we are now at the same level of the us fuck taht shit fuck that gov . only good fock suck XXXX

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] SteefLem@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago

So whats the fucking point of GDPR then.

[-] ShroOmeric@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago
[-] friek@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago
[-] Chrishering33@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Max Schrems is an assassin but this one might be a bit more difficult to challenge compared to the previous ones. Will be interesting to see his argumentation, though. NOYB is doing good work and will certainly work on this next

[-] friek@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

Huge fan of NOYB, if I were religious I would say they're doing the Lord's work.

[-] Kodemystic@lemmy.kodemystic.dev 9 points 2 years ago

Some folks got a big fat check it seems, they call it lobbying.

[-] HonestMistake_@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

that the United States ensures an adequate level of protection—comparable to that of the European Union

I guess this makes sense, with the new French spying measures, they're now basically the same

Can the US just please stop making the world worse?

[-] AnonTwo@kbin.social 5 points 2 years ago

This doesn't make sense to me given it sounds like there was a pending case with facebook about privacy concerns. Someone has to bring that up in protest....

[-] vlad76@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 2 years ago

And the world is once again worse off.

[-] Kissaki@feddit.de 3 points 2 years ago

It's apparently not much different than the last two tries. Expect a cancelation or revokation.

The US did not change that only US citizens have data/privacy rights. That can't confirm to EU rights.

[-] AnEilifintChorcra@sopuli.xyz 2 points 2 years ago

NOYB have a good write up about how they came to the agreement by using this simple trick, the EU and US have different definitions of the word "proportionate" but the US's definition is undisclosed...

https://noyb.eu/en/european-commission-gives-eu-us-data-transfers-third-round-cjeu

[-] Charliebeans@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 years ago

What does this really change for EU citizens?

[-] Dahjoos@lemmy.fmhy.ml 9 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

As a EU (plus UK) citizen, you have a bunch of pretty neat rights over your data due to GDPR, and unlike most other laws, violating GDPR can really hurt the perpetrator (since they get fined as % of revenue, not % of profit)

GDPR also allows the transfer of data to other countries, but only if the receiving country has privacy protection laws equivalent to GDPR, which excludes pretty much anywhere outside the EU/Eurozone

So, they basically get to ignore GDPR altogether, with no consequences, if this isn't shut down by the EU right fucking now

The results include, but are not limited to:

-Storing cookies in your computer without your explicit consent (user tracking)

-Targetted ads that you can't opt out of

-Foreign actors having access to your data

-No way to request the deletion of your data, alongside the erosion of most rights about them

-probably many more

[-] floofloof@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

It seems to mean that companies can get around all your privacy protections, such as GDPR, simply by hosting their servers in the USA. Then they can mine your data all they like and you have no recourse. I guess the right people were paid/threatened, because this undermines a lot of the EU's work on data protection over the past several years.

[-] Cataphract@lemmy.ko4abp.com 2 points 2 years ago

I guess the right people were paid/threatened

either that or this was the playbook from the beginning for more political theater. Probably got some nice votes and exposure to the people "fighting" it.

[-] LightDelaBlue@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

stealing our data. like in the US sadly . its like a bypass for google and facebook if i get it corectly.

[-] privacyn@feddit.it 1 points 2 years ago

Don’t be so negative, it is not a full loss as you all say.

The European Court of Justice already killed the previous 2 adequacy decisions in the Schrems cases, and it may happen in few years from now again.

Apart from that, though the US are clearly not adequate for data protection following GDPR standards, they have somehow to comply with GDPR. Businesses in the US are now applying 2-standards to EU citizens and the rest of the world, in order to comply with our data protection framework.

Until yesterday, all companies and public organisations using US services were not compliant with the law, because there was no legal basis available for data transfers to the US. Nevertheless we were all using their services. It’s best to have in place an adequacy decision which is not perfect (and probably not compliant) than nothing and living in a far west.

[-] LightDelaBlue@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

i kinda freak out tbh . mostly what my country do actualy (france) its..... not good at alls....

[-] privacyn@feddit.it 1 points 2 years ago

In France you have good practices too, qwant, ovh to name a couple

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
38 points (97.5% liked)

Privacy

37024 readers
255 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS